[{"author": "Michael Richardson", "text": "

Hello!

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:01:19Z"}, {"author": "Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis", "text": "

You have a new version of draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension :)

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:06:44Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

indeed

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:06:57Z"}, {"author": "Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis", "text": "

Great, just in case you hadn't see it due to the meeting preparation

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:07:30Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

thanks for your intense work on this!

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:08:02Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

FWIW I agree with the general principle that we should only use RFC 2119 keywords to state new requirements \u2014 if we\u2019re just stating a consequence of an existing requirement that\u2019s great for clarity, but the ALL CAPS keyword is generally not needed.

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:26:40Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

Exactly what Dominique said!

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:27:22Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

PLEASE MUTE

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:29:50Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

Also newbie question \u2014 what\u2019s the term that keeps getting transcribed as \u201cMr. Half\u201d, \u201cmystery hop\u201d, \u201cMister Harf\u201d, etc?

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:31:23Z"}, {"author": "Ines Robles", "text": "

MRHOF

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:31:38Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

nicknamed Mister Hoff

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:32:04Z"}, {"author": "Ines Robles", "text": "

Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:32:18Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

TYVM. So indeed the transcription isn\u2019t awful!

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:32:26Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

(Well SOME of the attempts aren\u2019t awful! :smile: )

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:33:30Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "

agree

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:33:37Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6719

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:33:55Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "

I meen agree with pascal

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:34:42Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "

As an additional note to Sue\u2019s point, the shepherd writeup asks to know if the specification has been implemented, I think under \u201cquality\u201d. So as things stand, I think the answer would be \u201cno\u201d. Which can be ok, it\u2019s not a requirement, rather a point of information.

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:47:55Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "

IMHO doing Experemental track is better

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:48:36Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "

agreeing with susan

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:49:28Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "

I support Michael's suggestion

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:52:59Z"}, {"author": "Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis", "text": "

Thanks a lot! Goodbye!

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:54:36Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "

ok thanks wg chair

", "time": "2023-11-08T12:54:39Z"}]