[{"author": "Michael Richardson", "text": "
Hello!
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:01:19Z"}, {"author": "Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis", "text": "You have a new version of draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension :)
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:06:44Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "indeed
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:06:57Z"}, {"author": "Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis", "text": "Great, just in case you hadn't see it due to the meeting preparation
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:07:30Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "thanks for your intense work on this!
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:08:02Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "FWIW I agree with the general principle that we should only use RFC 2119 keywords to state new requirements \u2014 if we\u2019re just stating a consequence of an existing requirement that\u2019s great for clarity, but the ALL CAPS keyword is generally not needed.
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:26:40Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "Exactly what Dominique said!
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:27:22Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "PLEASE MUTE
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:29:50Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "Also newbie question \u2014 what\u2019s the term that keeps getting transcribed as \u201cMr. Half\u201d, \u201cmystery hop\u201d, \u201cMister Harf\u201d, etc?
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:31:23Z"}, {"author": "Ines Robles", "text": "MRHOF
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:31:38Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "nicknamed Mister Hoff
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:32:04Z"}, {"author": "Ines Robles", "text": "Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:32:18Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "TYVM. So indeed the transcription isn\u2019t awful!
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:32:26Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "(Well SOME of the attempts aren\u2019t awful! :smile: )
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:33:30Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "agree
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:33:37Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6719
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:33:55Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "I meen agree with pascal
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:34:42Z"}, {"author": "John Scudder", "text": "As an additional note to Sue\u2019s point, the shepherd writeup asks to know if the specification has been implemented, I think under \u201cquality\u201d. So as things stand, I think the answer would be \u201cno\u201d. Which can be ok, it\u2019s not a requirement, rather a point of information.
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:47:55Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "IMHO doing Experemental track is better
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:48:36Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "agreeing with susan
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:49:28Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "I support Michael's suggestion
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:52:59Z"}, {"author": "Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis", "text": "Thanks a lot! Goodbye!
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:54:36Z"}, {"author": "Abdussalam Baryun", "text": "ok thanks wg chair
", "time": "2023-11-08T12:54:39Z"}]