I noted this on the IVY list, but once again, the side meeting last night was a meeting of individuals to exchange information between themselves about the topics noted in the liaison. It was not a meeting between BBF and IVY. Any output or information of that meeting must be brought into each group respectively to have any standing.
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:50:01Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "Could y'all use the microphones please
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:54:09Z"}, {"author": "Xueyan Song", "text": "Agree with Dave. Actually the limitations of side-meeting to discuss BBF LS has been sent to IVY WG email-list and I have also shared it to BBF participants before this meeting. Thanks, Xueyan (BBF Liaison Officer)
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:54:24Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "@meetecho remote can hardly hear the floor mic
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:56:56Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "It is indeed a bit lower, but we can hear it relatively well
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:57:45Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "May be user error. Can just hear Kireeti
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:58:14Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "We'll go raise its gain a bit
", "time": "2024-03-19T23:58:57Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "Sorry, chairs, I have given up taking notes as I can't hear the speakers
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:01:39Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "Someone from the AV team just raised the levels
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:01:57Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "Is it better now?
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:02:01Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "Marginal
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:04:50Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "Perhaps I've gone deaf
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:04:57Z"}, {"author": "Juan Cardona", "text": "As Diego mentioned.. we are working on \"features' with respect of licenses (entitlements), and yes.. it would be independent from the WG main model..
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:05:22Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "Agree with Daniele. The key point is to carefully describe the provisions for more rich functionalities
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:05:28Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "Italo, capabilities can be separated from topology. However, the actual activation/use in a context of a network, topo is important. The top/inventory mapping I-D can be used then (with the link with SAPs)
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:09:40Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "To handle capabilities properly may need YANG language changes (e.g., part of the YANG Next) work, so that it is possible for configuration constraints to reference the capabilities during validation.
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:10:06Z"}, {"author": "Juan Cardona", "text": "features/capabilities could be independent defined from licenses, but we need them to define licenses because in the number of vpns in the router is limited by a license, then the model should be able to express this.
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:10:18Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "Regarding the discussion, it is worth noting the IVY WG charter and milestones:
\nJul 2024 Request publication of the below YANG data model.
\nOct 2023 Adopt an Internet-Draft describing a core network inventory YANG data model that can be used as a foundation by other YANG models to establish technology-specific inventory models.
Slides serve as a reminder to people that the autoconvert of uploaded PowerPoint slides is unreliable. Check your slides or supply your own PDF
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:11:59Z"}, {"author": "Qiufang Ma", "text": "+1 to Adrian's comments
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:12:24Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "Once that core work is done, then the WG may want to discuss the next steps and recharter to explicitly cover the extensions/augmentations that are being that it is interested in.
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:12:54Z"}, {"author": "Marisol", "text": "Even in ALMO, it is not considered license or entitlement as an asset, this could be changed, as i attribute type for asset is considered, where we should consider entitlement/license as augmented model from the ASSET YANG model. We will appreciate if we could get consensus on this point from the WG.
", "time": "2024-03-20T00:41:13Z"}, {"author": "Vishnu Beeram", "text": "Does \"velocity\" (from the imported geo-location module) make sense for network inventory location?
", "time": "2024-03-20T01:04:47Z"}, {"author": "Bo Wu", "text": "@Vishnu Beeram Thanks Pavan\uff0cwe will think about it.
", "time": "2024-03-20T01:19:36Z"}, {"author": "Marisol", "text": "I had the same question than Danielle, as I see similarities with Tony's draft and POWEFF as well
", "time": "2024-03-20T01:30:30Z"}, {"author": "Marisol", "text": "there is a side meeting tomorrow 9:00 am to discuss on power metrics, it will be great to have further discussion there
", "time": "2024-03-20T01:32:17Z"}]