[{"author": "Per Andersson", "text": "

Notes for the session https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-119-netconf

", "time": "2024-03-19T03:01:09Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "

Someone's on the way to help

", "time": "2024-03-19T03:01:50Z"}, {"author": "Per Andersson", "text": "

Thank you Rob!

", "time": "2024-03-19T03:07:07Z"}, {"author": "Alex Huang Feng", "text": "

Thank you Rob!

", "time": "2024-03-19T03:07:17Z"}, {"author": "Per Andersson", "text": "

Is it possible to pan the camera to the presenter

", "time": "2024-03-19T03:11:31Z"}, {"author": "Per Andersson", "text": "

Perfect, thanks!

", "time": "2024-03-19T03:11:49Z"}, {"author": "Wim Henderickx", "text": "

on dual-stack.I am not sure I understood, but I don't see this as associated with VRF. For me dual stack means the server is configured with at least 1 ipv4 and 1 ipv6 address. We should support this in my view.

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:04:05Z"}, {"author": "Mahesh Jethanandani", "text": "

@Wim, do you want to come to the mike to ask the question?

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:06:27Z"}, {"author": "Wim Henderickx", "text": "

Mahesh Jethanandani said:

\n
\n

@Wim, do you want to come to the mike to ask the question?

\n
\n

done

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:11:01Z"}, {"author": "Ahmed Elhassany", "text": "

The alternative approach for encoding RFC5277 done by libnetconf2 using containers https://github.com/CESNET/libnetconf2/blob/master/tests/data/modules/notifications.yin

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:23:24Z"}, {"author": "Alex Huang Feng", "text": "

I tried some time ago, defining the yang as a container, but since the content of the Notification is specified when you are defining the notification from the yang using the \"notification\" statement, this need to be as a structure because I am defining the \"type\" notification in YANG

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:31:27Z"}, {"author": "Mahesh Jethanandani", "text": "

To the question of non-NMDA compliant, I would agree with Rob in that I do not know we want to be prescriptive about it.

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:33:57Z"}, {"author": "Mahesh Jethanandani", "text": "

Isn't there a requirement to move the leaf from deprecated to obsolete before we say that module-state does not need to be implemented/supported?

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:39:02Z"}, {"author": "Jean Quilbeuf", "text": "

(deleted)

", "time": "2024-03-19T04:46:12Z"}]