[{"author": "Will Law", "text": "

Yes, Victor raised the issue

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:25:28Z"}, {"author": "Alan Frindell", "text": "

I would maybe ask any moq participants closer to the media side to chime in

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:25:37Z"}, {"author": "Will Law", "text": "

https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/issues/559

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:26:04Z"}, {"author": "David Schinazi", "text": "

Whoo! Bikesheds!

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:33:15Z"}, {"author": "Alex Chernyakhovsky", "text": "

Are we sponsored by Big Shed now?

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:33:41Z"}, {"author": "Will Law", "text": "

+1 for applicationProtocol or applicationDefinedProtocol

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:37:11Z"}, {"author": "David Schinazi", "text": "

Is there a single word that's not overloaded in networking? :P

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:38:01Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Bernier", "text": "

;-)

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:38:26Z"}, {"author": "Magnus Westerlund", "text": "

There are layers all the way down.

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:38:27Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Lennox", "text": "

And applications all the way up

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:38:40Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "

The applicable scope of ALPN is already messed up. But here, I think we do mean the same thing.

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:38:51Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Lennox", "text": "

From QUIC's point of view, WebTransport is an application-layer protocol...

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:39:03Z"}, {"author": "David Schinazi", "text": "

Running h3 over WebTransport would be fun. That's a MASQUE amount of turtles

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:39:12Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "

I'll say again, I have seen an HTTP over Websockets library.

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:39:41Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

Nobody can compete with MASQUE.

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:39:45Z"}, {"author": "Alex Chernyakhovsky", "text": "

David Schinazi said:

\n
\n

Running h3 over WebTransport would be fun. That's a MASQUE amount of turtles

\n
\n

but _why_

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:39:47Z"}, {"author": "Alex Chernyakhovsky", "text": "

Mike Bishop said:

\n
\n

I'll say again, I have seen an HTTP over Websockets library.

\n
\n

but _why_

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:40:03Z"}, {"author": "Magnus Westerlund", "text": "

Call it WUP, Webtrans using protocol

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:40:15Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "

Actual no opinion is don't vote.

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:42:02Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

Meetecho, if you have a free hand, perhaps you could pan over the room for use remoties?

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:53:31Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

Meetecho, you're a good friend :-)

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:54:18Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "

:D

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:54:51Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "

didn't lose me, lgtm

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:55:25Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "

regarding implementations of WT over H2, the thing that worries me is library interest

", "time": "2024-07-25T22:58:38Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

Exactly my thoughts.

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:02:57Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

I too am uncomfortable with DATA_RECVD.

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:03:12Z"}, {"author": "Nidhi Jaju", "text": "

+1 to using the same name

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:04:28Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "

Ah, I was misunderstanding from the slides: It's currently \"Data Recvd\" and is changing. The new proposal is \"All data committed\" for WebTransport generically.

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:05:16Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "

Over QUIC, that corresponds to the Data Recvd state; over H2 that corresponds to writing everything to the TCP socket.

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:06:59Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

Does anyone know how much overhead does h3 bring?

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:07:27Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "

Ah, and I previously commented on the Data Recvd PR. Not all QUIC stacks expose the Data Recvd state to the application.

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:09:38Z"}, {"author": "Francesca Palombini", "text": "

thanks all!

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:28:38Z"}, {"author": "Juliusz Chroboczek", "text": "

Thanks!

", "time": "2024-07-25T23:28:46Z"}]