Working Group Draft Update : 
  * Concern : We have many working group document which are not making progress and lots of new work being produced as rev_0 drafts.  
  * Thanks for AD Gunter for moving queue fast and many draft's being reviewed. 
  * draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb
      - Susan Hares: Submitted review during oct , authors already exchanged correction. Will post in mailer again. Did finish Genev and controller drafts review as well.  
      - Stephane : We need to finish review of IPVPN interconnect. 
      - Jeff : We have gone through an agreement of content 
      - Matthew : We want to close loop on open discussion about BESS / IDR review . 
      - Jeff : Loop has been closed, will check once again. 
      - Jorge : loop has been closed and ready to move. 

  * draft geneve mathew is chasing editors to make change. 
  * 7432 bis : 
     - not much discussion in mail 
     - 10 people think its ready for WGLC during poll in room. 

  * Need to close existing drafts before making more Adoption of document. 

  Susan : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-23 - still needs to use RFC7606 language.  The text is going in the right direction, but needs to use RFC7606 language

draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless-01      

  * Ready for last call 
  * Ali - There is sister draft and its natural extension . Its long overdue to go over last call. 

draft-ietf-bess-weighted-hrw-01            
  * Some modification may be needed to add more detail about HRW. 

draft-ietf-bess-secure-evpn-01           
   Stephane : As chair, which WG making data plane part 
   Ali - no data port modification 
   Stephane : you adding new UDP port 
   Ali : Yes 
   Stephane : This work can not be done in BESS 
   Ali : it was done in NVO3
   Matthew : there will be discussion to merge NVO + BESS 

   Susan : will send side note to include tunnel encap description in draft. 

draft-sajassi-bess-rfc8317bis-02  

* Ready for adoption call. 
* Jeffery : please send email also in list. please check Wiki as well. 

draft-lrss-bess-evpn-group-policy-01     
  Ali - 7348 bis to be expedited. 
  Matthew : There is no much work in NVO, so may be we present it in routing WG so there is enough visibility.  
  Jeff : republish the draft in routing group and there was agreement about it . 
  Mathew : Not sure if need to be republished, but we need to be present it. 
  Aijun Wang : supporting the work since we need to update VxLAN header 
  Gunter : what we learnt from Trustee that 7348 is not IETF owned document. it was individual submission. publish new draft and just add IANA section. 
  Matthew: it was informational draft (RFC 7348) and changed towards end.  
 * Jeff Hass: This is opportunity to take it to full standard. 
 * Jeff : will it create problem with reference. it will be misref for standard. 
 * Gunter : It has not been discussed. right now idea is to bring informational document. for standard it has to be reviewed and modified. 

draft-rabnag-bess-evpn-anycast-aliasing-02

Janos Farkas : Multi chassis is part of standard , deployment do use proprietary deployment.  
Ali : The implementation we know all the vendor, all implementation are proprietary. 
Jeff : operational consideration section needs to be added. 
Patrice : convergence is really fast. It will be good to mention that . 

draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-08   
* Next draft will be merged with next draft and ready for adoption call.  
* Yao Liu : any consideration for L3VPN and SRv6
* Patrice : After merging we will see the next step


draft-liu-bess-srv6-service-sid-nffrr-flag-02 

Ketan : We have agreement to merge and co-operate in EVPN document. 
Jorge : argument is not in current version of draft. 
Ketan : it was part of offline discussion. After merge it will be clear. 


draft-levyabegnoli-bess-evpn-savi-03         

draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv-02    
Sasha : comment has been sent to WG please take look 
Aijun : Some question about MH PE and related binding. Will Discuss it offline 

draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-first-hop-security-03
 * Ready for adoption 
 David Lamparter : Do we need this work ? we need to reference DHCP6 as well. why not to use DHCP active lease query RFC.  
 Krishna : MAy be not valid for MH point and we can sync up offline and close on this. 


draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-umr-mobility-02         
* Ready for adoption 

draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-06    
Jorge : RFC9252 timeframe would have been good time to write . Now its hard to implement it in brownfield scenario .
Ketan : ability to understand capability is well known. MPLS , SRv6 talking together will require lots of planning. we will not get any benifit.   

draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00     
Ali - Solution is well documented but problem statement not documented. 
Krishna - Route type 12 and 13 have been already used.