Liaison from SG11, no response needed, BMWG can review:
\nhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/2103/
the asymmetrical draft was now approved and is in the rfc editor queue.
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:17:14.000Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "Independent of the option that will be picked, please consider adding an Ops Considerations seciton to discuss in particular the impact vs 8972, backward compatibility, etc.
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:38:13.000Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "Also, please consider send a note to TSVWG to have a review on the transport specific parts
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:38:39.000Z"}, {"author": "Justin Iurman", "text": "@meetecho speaker camera didn't actually include the onsite speaker, maybe zoom out a little bit?
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:40:41.000Z"}, {"author": "Lorenzo Miniero", "text": "@Justin Iurman ack! Please don't hesitate to nudge us if we fail to miss capturing a speaker on camera (we're controlling all rooms at the same time so we sometimes miss switches)
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:42:09.000Z"}, {"author": "Xiao Min", "text": "@Med OK, we'll do that.
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:49:39.000Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "Thanks Xiao
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:54:15.000Z"}, {"author": "Greg White", "text": "@Med, thanks for the input
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:54:21.000Z"}, {"author": "Thomas Graf", "text": "Please also consider to look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark which is defining the Alternate Marking IPFIX elements. Currently being discussed at OPSAWG.
", "time": "2026-03-19T01:56:43.000Z"}, {"author": "Dan Voyer", "text": "interesting observation from Greg - how to validate that
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:07:17.000Z"}, {"author": "Thomas Graf", "text": "@Dan and @Greg, this is why at the end of this session we will have 4 questions to get a better view on cross reviews.
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:09:45.000Z"}, {"author": "Qin Wu", "text": "@Dan for many poll raised in other WGs, I can also see similar tie or close tie results. Be careful not misinterpret the results.
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:17:00.000Z"}, {"author": "Dan Voyer", "text": "@Qin Wu, ack
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:21:54.000Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "I also don\"t understand the causality between the poll and the join discusion work. If there is an aspect that should concerns us is the low number of those who have read the doc.
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:23:38.000Z"}, {"author": "Dan Voyer", "text": "yeah - I thought Greg's observation was - group BMWG read more on BMWG and IPPM read IPPM stuff. Both groups have low attendance hence the results are not super obvious
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:29:04.000Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "For AI/LLM, an excerpt of relevant I-Ds and BMWG/IPPM are being tracked here: https://github.com/IETF-OPS-AD/AINETOPS?tab=readme-ov-file#llmai-benchmarking
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:29:21.000Z"}, {"author": "Giuseppe Fioccola", "text": "Thank you Med, we also added these drafts as BMWG related documents: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/bmwg/documents/
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:31:32.000Z"}, {"author": "Justin Iurman", "text": "do we (the IETF) still encourage new IPv4 Options standardization?
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:52:43.000Z"}, {"author": "Dan Voyer", "text": "@Justin, I believe if there are enough people willing to work on this along with good use cases, then I don't see why not
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:57:54.000Z"}, {"author": "Justin Iurman", "text": "@Dan sure, just find it odd in practice regarding IPv4 (vs IPv6) in general
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:59:35.000Z"}, {"author": "Justin Iurman", "text": "the corresponding IANA registry speaks for itself btw
", "time": "2026-03-19T02:59:58.000Z"}, {"author": "Giuseppe Fioccola", "text": "@Justin Iurman I had the same thought. I remember a statement from the IETF about IPv6 for future protocol work.
", "time": "2026-03-19T03:00:57.000Z"}, {"author": "Thomas Graf", "text": "Today at 12:45 - 13:45 in the IESG room Liaoning, the chairs, Med as AD and Qin will start initial discussions on IPPM and BMWG chartering. Please feel free to join us.
", "time": "2026-03-19T03:01:09.000Z"}, {"author": "Justin Iurman", "text": "@Giuseppe +1, exactly the same thought
", "time": "2026-03-19T03:01:20.000Z"}, {"author": "dr. Pinkert", "text": "which github repo / group?
", "time": "2026-03-19T03:04:39.000Z"}, {"author": "Thomas Graf", "text": "We will open a new repository at https://github.com/ietf-ippm for the chartering proposals
", "time": "2026-03-19T03:05:23.000Z"}]