---------------------------------------------
PKIX WG (pkix-wg)

http://ietf.org/html.charters/pkix-charter.html

WEDNESDAY, November 8, 2006 1300-1500 
===========================================
CHAIR: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>

AGENDA:

1. WG Status and Direction

  1.1 Document Status Review (10 min)
      Stefan Santesson (WG co-chair)
      
      
2. PKIX WG Specifications 

  2.1 3280bis (10 min)
      David Cooper (NIST)
        http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-05.txt

      A new draft 05 was recently posted as response to past WG last call.


  2.2 Simple Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP) (15 min)
      David Cooper (NIST)
        http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-27.txt

      This document is still in AD evaluation - New draft requested by the AD


  2.3 Certificate Management Messages over CMS (CMC) (10 min)
      Jim Schaad (Soaring Hawk Consulting)
        http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-2797-bis-04.txt
        http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-trans-05.txt
        http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-compl-03.txt

      These documents are under IESG review which has resulted in several
      change requests


  2.4 Algorithm IDs for Elliptic Curve Cryptography in PKIX (10 min)
      Daniel Brown (Certicom)
       http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-pkalgs-03.txt

     General status report. The Algorithm ID issue is deferred 2.4


  2.5 Design team report on ECC public key identifiers (20 min)
      Tim Polk (NIST)

      Proposed way forward on the subject public key field for ECC algorithms


3. Related Specifications & Liaison Presentations
      Time allowing, liaison presentations will be accommodated to ensure the
      PKIX WG is aware of related specifications currently progressing as
      individual drafts.

  3.1 Validation Certificates in CRLs (15 min)
      Stefan Santesson (Microsoft)

      A new individual draft is submitted. Should this be accepted as a WG
      document?