-------------------------------------------------------------- CONEX WG meeting minutes IETF82 meeting -------------------------------------------------------------- Minute taker: Andrew McGregor 2. ConEx Concepts and Use Cases https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/ Alissa 20 min Last call right away, probably today. 3. Destination Option for Conex. Suresh - 10 min Rich: If X is not set, L, E, C must be zero. Is that written from the perspective of a sender, or from a middlebox? Middleboxes should probably not care about LEC if X is off, makes it more extensible. Mirja: Byte-wise accounting Matt: Bits on segments for byte-wise accounting has some issues with over-claiming congestion. Andrew: 'SHOULD' is the right level, because much hardware has strict alignment requirements and works more at a packet than a byte level. If you have to work in packets, that's better than not doing conex. Proposed to move this in lock-step with TCP mods 4. TCP modifications for Congestion Exposure https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-conex-tcp-modifications/ Mirja 10 min Need more guidance over modes of operation in the draft. Many for adoption as WG draft 5. "Initial Congestion Exposure (ConEx) Deployment Examples" http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00 10-15mins --------------------------------------------------------------