Background (chairs) - 5 min (1700 - 1705) (introduce the BoF and give a brief summary of AQM discussion in TSVAREA at last IETF draft charter will be posted to mailing list, and we will assume people are roughly familiar with it) Recommendations (Fred Baker) - 10 min (1705 - 1715) (talk about the state of the document and what it's trying to do in terms of updating 2309 and adding lessons learned) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation Example Algorithms For Consideration - 40 min (1715 - 1755) PIE (Rong Pan) - 15 min http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-tsvwg-pie *FQ_CODEL and/or variants (Andrew McGregor) - 15 min http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel compare/contrast goals/features (group discussion) - 10 min (need to mention packet scheduling versus pure single-queue AQM as distinguishing features here) BoF Questions (chairs) - remaining time (1755 - 1830) (put up draft charter on screen for reference) - should packet scheduling be a part of the charter? - are the goals of this WG clear, well-scoped, solvable, and useful? - should Fred's document be an initial WG item? - how many people might be planning to work directly on algorithms? (writing the specs, implementing, testing / evaluating) - should the group require evaluation criteria and requirements to be finished before adopting algorithm specifications? - should testing methodology be something the WG focuses on early? - should the group initially aim for a single AQM spec, or take on multiple algorithms in parallel? - should an AQM working group be formed? - should the working group NOT be formed? Adjourn BoF at or before 1830