Topic: "why JMAP" Issue: JMAP Mail: keywords seems concluded action item: register four $XXX keywords for system flags (Chris volunteered to help with IANA considerations) discussion, but no objections from attendees Issue: JMAP Mail: Submission changed to use a more JMAP-ish MessageSubmission object ongoing discussion seems close to consensus action item: Chris Newman will propose syntax to align better with concern expressed about name "messageid" no other objections from attendees about general direction Issue: JMAP Mail: Message object & partial body fetch no proposal yet suggestion to expose IMAP MIME part numbers in attachment list discussion that HTTP range is probably not be sufficient needs more discussion Issue: JMAP Core: extension mechanisms needs some work but no significant controversy expressed in room Issue: JMAP Core: authentication action item: need to split to separate document action item: Torsten & Neil will discuss possibility of profiling OAuth point: possible interaction with token binding WG Issue: JMAP Core: push mechanism discussion of Martin's objections to EventSource discussion of encryption of push data Issue: JMAP Core: "transport" HTTP as a tunnel vs. HTTP resources for every object long discussion Github Tickets * changed vs. created in getFooUpdates (issues/78) * disallow destroying mailboxes with messages (issues/69) some preference expressed to allow delete of mailbox with messages * mailboxids property - Chris