20181023 IETF homenet wg interim meeting ======================================== Logistics: ========== Webex details: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mca447be3b15845189801f00cf05f1d21 Jabber room: xmpp:homenet@jabber.ietf.org?join (will only be used if requested) etherpad: https://etherpad.tools.ietf.org/p/notes-20181023-homenet [ Chairs - did not forget to hit "record" button:-) ] Attendees: ========== Chairs: - Barbara Stark - Stephen Farrell Present: - Michael Richardson - Ted Lemon - John Woodworth Minute taker: - chairs + help, in etherpad Agenda: ======= 1. Agenda bash 2. Identify/progress issues with draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming-02+ 3. Next meeting: Bangkok 4. AOB Minutes: ======== 1. Agenda bash N/A. 2. homenet-simple-naming https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFe1LP6BDOrYuYZo0u0jPKIOnORv43PMp66GAgORHnE/edit?ts=5bce9e22 was sync'd to https://github.com/ietf-homenet-wg/simple-naming before call for today's call google doc is it, diff vs. current ID: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-homenet-wg/simple-naming/master/draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming.txt Chatting about new(ish) sections, that WG participants may want to look at before IETF103 - section 11, HDeRP which is the new bit, and provides a way for an ISP to delegate a global name to a homenet (if not done otherwise) - (end of) section 4: MCR: maybe we want to ask IANA to add a ULA documentation prefix like fd00:2001:db8::/48 (see end of section 4) - section 7.2: homenet reverse mapping update protocol - section 6.3: DNS Push - section 2.1: CDN issue/difficulty (with >1 ISP) may need more text & more text in section 6 (just before 6.1) about provisioning domains - +lots of new text (go read it all:-) - formatting issue in mid section 6 - Ted will push out new I-D before extended cutoff today Ted also planning to write a document extending HNCP (also today) that'll be referenced from simple-naming 3. Next call: None scheduled; next meeting: Bangkok - Barbara: Post IETF103, do we want more of these calls? They're useful even if sparsely attended. - Ted: has been useful, may want to try a few more before year end - MCR: also happy to continue, may be implementing some of this in Jan, not sure - John: also interested in future calls, won't be @ IETF103 4. AOB Barbara: HOWTO get more folks engaged and providing feedback? Planning to allow unstructured time @IETF103 for folks to discuss simple-naming (will send mail to list before meeting).