CBOR WG Conference Call Wednesday, Feb 27 2019, 18:00 - 19:00 UTC Chairs: Barry Leiba, Francesca Palombini Minute takers: Francesca Participants: * Francesca Palombini * Carsten Bormann * Jim Schaad * Laurence Lundblade * Paul Hoffman * Michael Richardson * Jeff Sipek * Jeffrey Yasskin Agenda: * CDDL Status * CBOR Bis status * Tags documents - CDDL Status: Still in IESG review, Ekr DISCUSS FP: AP on Barry to remind Ekr this week - CBOR Bis: https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/issues PR17: will close 37, 45, 3 (do a check first, PR18 will contribute to close 3) Paul: Issues in reasonably good shape, PRs still big work to be done Jeffrey has not had time to check the PR but will do. message from Jim from Jan 16 which is still to do Laurence: should I look at PR17 in detail in relation to 37 or 45 before it's merged? Paul: do it after? It is easier to check with the rest of the changes Issue #25: feels that can be closed, there is not much we can do about it. Jeffrey: agree Paul: send a message to the list AP Jeffrey to check both PR17 and PR18, send to authors to be merged and everybody to check afterward. https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/commits/master canonicalization in one section Tag validity (PR18) Carsten: always a problem with that, figured it out why: see new issue in the array-tags document: https://github.com/cbor-wg/array-tags/issues/1 How do we handle that in tag validity? worth looking at this issue in more detail (Carsten, Jeffrey) Paul: not assuming we're going to make progress on this as it is complicated Jeffrey: agree we should figure it out, but would not want to block progress Carsten: rather keep the flexibility in a way that it does not become a problem later IANA Considerations for CBOR Bis 2 new registry by CBOR: simple values and tags Tags has been used Tried to have low thresholds IANA Considerations: only the low points are DE, but IANA still contacted DE Propose to mend the 1+1 and 1+2 registration policy 1+1: specification required (minor change, more detail about Expert review) 1+2: FCFS to ER MCR: what is the problem with now? Carsten: Problem is that someone could come and take 50 numbers and the expert could not stop it Paul: yes, expert review. Expert says no, they appeal, and goes to IETF. (for 1+1) MCR: agree, don't need to have more info. Francesca (hat off): likes having more text about what experts will decide on. Paul: don't agree with changing 2+1 to Expert Required. We can reconsider if get >50% of tags occupied. AP Carsten: propose to have PRs for next meeting about text on Expert guidelines/guidelines for tags requesters. Carsten: text about circuit breaker? Paul: no, that is the IESG job new document: port json-seq to CBOR MCR: seems interesting Laurence: suggest a very week link to it from CBOR Bis. AP Carsten to propose text in CBOR Bis Carsten: Discussion on rechartering? Next meeting + Prague. Also discussion in the ML.