CBOR WG Meeting - Interim 19
Wednesday, November 6, 2019, 16:00 - 17:00 UTC
Chairs: Francesca Palombini, Jim Schaad

Presents:
    Francesca,
    Carsten,
    Laurence

* CDDL survey
  Carsten to review and send comments to chairs
  Chairs get it out hopefully before Singapore - what wgs? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8610/referencedby/ + ietf ml + Other SDOs (Henk)?
  Discuss during f2f
  Ping after Singapore

* Agenda for IETF106 (chairs)

Proposal:
  * Introduction [5'] : Chairs
  * CBOR specification status [25'] : Carsten
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis
  * CDDL cont. - Ways forward [15'] : Carsten / Chairs
  * Flextime [10']
  * Wrap-up [5'] : Chairs

* CBOR specification (Carsten)

  #63 long time, need to decide if we want to do nothing and what the implications are in the text. Jeffrey more on one side of the spectrum.
    LL: nothing says any implementation has to do any particular set or subset. True with every particular RFC. We can have shoulds about generic encoder but not must.
    CB: must is in 4th paragraph of section 5.6 https://cbor-wg.github.io/CBORbis/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis.html#map-keys
    LL: not ok
    Discuss in Singapore

  #130 - Carsten to continue the discussion with Peter

  #86 - Carsten thinks this can be closed, up to wg to say if not satisfied.

  Put the results of Laurence not well formed in CBOR repo - test-cases - AP Francesca

  AP chairs: decide and announce date for WGLC

* AOB
  Any activity CBOR related at the Hackathon? Not that we know of. Hannes RATS, TEEP may have. SUIT, WISHI, COSE.
  Might be useful to find people at the Hackathon to have a chat.