CBOR WG Meeting - Interim 20-11
Wednesday, June 17, 2020, 17:00 - 18:00 CEST
Chairs: Francesca Palombini, Jim Schaad

Recordings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-jKAs3VdJk

Attendees:
x Francesca Palombini
x Jim Schaad
x Peter Yee, AKAYLA
x Carsten Bormann, TZI
x Laurence Lundblade

Agenda:

* CBOR Tag for Date status : chairs
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-cbor-date-tag-01
Started WGLC ending June 30

* CBOR specification status : Carsten
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-14
  https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/
  CB: Updated the changes appendix.
Now a narrative rather than a bullet list even if that was useful.
In the notable tags draft will add a CBOR sequences tag
Use same construction in that they are mentioned but not defined in the document.
FP: Has looked at things and feels comformatable sending it on for publication.
JS: Question on IP issues
CB: Already replied and don't expect any issues with Paul.
FP: Do not feel that a new WGLC is needed
JS: Agree with that.
FP: Will push the button after the meeting.

* New control operators for CDDL: Carsten
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-control-01
  CB: No slides - Move low hanging fruit from freezer document to here.
Also JSON format for CDDL which should be simple
Two operators for computations w/ strings and number
Two ABNF operations
Feature operator for interacting w/ validation machinery.  Partial implmentation in the CDDL tools
Other operations will happen in version 2 of CDDL tool.
Expect it to be out by end of the month
When people have had a chance to work with this would be a good time for adoption call.
FP: What is expected time line?
CB: Depends on how much time people have to play with it.  


* AoB
FP: Two more intermim meetings coming up.
THen IETF 108 meeting.
Please let us know if you have items to add to the agendas for these meetings.
Good time to start focusing on the CDDL updates
CB: Some other items to start working on in the freezer.  SHould be able to prepare a strawman for some issues on the next agenda
FP:  Also need to think about the interim meeting schedule.  
CB: Have a break for August, but that may also be when IESG comes back w/ CBOR-bis comments
Wait until IETF 108 to decide on this?
FP: Good to have interims because 108 particpation could be odd.  Don't know if regularity goes
CB: Depends on how the ASDF process goes.  Have a BOF approved.
Idea is to take the OneDM standard and move forward.  Has some CDDL and JSON schema proposal work included.
May be need for this working group to position itself relative to this work.
May also need to do some extra work to support this effort.
Expect people to go to the BOF
FP: Work level could only be moitoring and following w/o meetings.

Meeting adjorned