https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2021-lpwan-07/materials/agenda-interim-2021-lpwan-07-lpwan-01-06
Laurent Date / Time
<hr />List to copy from (people not here):
Alexander presents the intro, agenda bashing, AD bashing, IPR notes etc Minutes of last meeting approved Taking the pulse of the WG about having a WG meeting at IETF-111: usual suspects will not wake up after midnight for an LPWAN meeting
Carsten: please do record the meeting Pascal: done (we are not recording all meetings by default)
rename to architecture/framework ? since it explains how to distribute keys. Explain the SCHC protocol can be deployed. What are the end-points.
ToC: - discuss schc technology and implies that a profle is needed for technology - what are the end points, different layers - data model
Eric V: how the rule are sharing rules Pascal: we will document that, data model says how it is install. But some text is missing now, work in progress. Can be improved.
Need more aggreement and discussion on the mailing list to converge,
2 types of end point : device and P2P
Security consideration; focuses on rules distribution
Eric: point attacks against encrypted traffic using dynamic dictionnary based compression (like ZIP) that are not effective to SCHC because of the static rules. This was raised during the IESG evaluation of CoAP/SCHC I-D.
Laurent will bring pointers
Pascal: Is there point that are missing ? - do we add an applicability statement ?
Alex: it makes sense
Carsten: compress Goose? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Substation_Events Pascal: lot of strings that can be compressed easily Carsten: over LPWAN Pascal: its generic it can be applied in other kind of networks.
Vincent: it is a L2 protocol, it is not a problem of size, more about routing Vincent: Happy to work on it.
Pascal: can we plan an intermin meeting on goose ? Vincent: yes, but not next meeting
Alex: there is a lot of protocol that can apply and 5G is also in our charter.
Pascal: applicability will grow, and may be a new document in the future
Pascal: Adoption ? Eric: the group has to decide, this document is useful with the YANG DM. Pascal: it gives the context, both are needed.
Alex: call for adoption. Nobody against, to be confirmed the mailing list. Eric: will give the status since there is a conflict of interest.
Lurent presents on the YANG doctors review. We're not experts many thanks to Carl Moberg. New version on the repo, reformatted with PYANG. NOw WG doc. review actions: different groups, use YANG feature to make parts mandatoy and others not. Laurent wishes feedback. Do we need that? Pascal: the protocol is very generic, support the idea to make everything feature