[{"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "For examples, there's also the option of defining something like 2001:db8::, but I think that's excessive here, and WONTFIX is good.<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T14:18:49Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Thomas Fossati) dear CoRE crew, is there an example of a CoAP Option with a CBOR format?<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:45:05Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Marco Tiloca) Do you mean of a CoAP Option value with value format opaque?<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:47:06Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Thomas Fossati) yes, where the opaque sequence of bytes happens to be a CBOR-encoded something<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:48:07Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Marco Tiloca) <a href=\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tiloca-core-groupcomm-proxy-06#section-3\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tiloca-core-groupcomm-proxy-06#section-3</a><br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:49:30Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Thomas Fossati) awesome, thanks!<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:50:12Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Marco Tiloca) This is provisional, since the (mid/long-term) plan was to switch to a CRI (and already in the referred -observe-multicast-notifications), but it would do for now :-)<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:50:38Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Thomas Fossati) lucky me then that CRI is not finished then :-)<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:51:08Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Marco Tiloca) Well, that would still be a CBOR array, just a different one :-)<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:53:06Z"}, {"author": "zulipbot", "text": "(Thomas Fossati) true dat<br/>", "time": "2022-06-08T15:55:05Z"}]