[{"author": "Joel Halpern", "text": "<p>Fortunately, there are some dots that meetecho does not care about.</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:01:20Z"}, {"author": "Rich Salz", "text": "<p>I agree with Barry that this document marks the end of the experiment.</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:13:32Z"}, {"author": "Rich Salz", "text": "<p>FYI, for this year's nomcom.  Out of 266 volunteers 258 had \"path 1\" qualification.</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:17:30Z"}, {"author": "Mirja K\u00fchlewind", "text": "<p>I'd be said if being-an-AD limits your ability to write/contribute/work on drafts.</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:19:27Z"}, {"author": "John Klensin", "text": "<p>Nodding strongly to \"don't just put another name\".  If we add anyone, it needs to be a real contributing author</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:20:20Z"}, {"author": "John Klensin", "text": "<p>@Mirja, agree, but this particular mechanism is special (and some other procedural ones may be) because of the appearance of the IESG generating and approving a procedure that selects the IESG.  Again, I thought it was important to have the discussion, not to reach any particular outcome.  If no one feels strongly about it and there are no volunteers who really want to dig in, I think the answer is clear.</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:24:44Z"}, {"author": "Robert Sparks", "text": "<p>wave</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:28:08Z"}, {"author": "Mirja K\u00fchlewind", "text": "<p>bye!</p>", "time": "2022-09-27T14:28:12Z"}]