CELLAR -- DRAFT AGENDA for 2023-06-27 Virtual Interim Meeting

Administrivia

INFO:

https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-interim-2023-cellar-06-cellar
https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/chair-notes/tree/master/interim-2023-06
**Note that we're now pointing to the Github repo for chair notes here**

MEETING INFO and WEB CONFERENCE:

info:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2023-cellar-06/session/cellar

https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=d6f664b3-63f5-4863-9079-8edf61e9b60b

note that chat is now Zulip:
https://zulip.ietf.org/login/#narrow/stream/cellar
but is accessible via meetecho interface.

Shared HedgeDoc for notetaking

Now using the Datatracker assigned notepad at:
https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-interim-2023-cellar-06-cellar

Note that if you log in to the IETF datatracker, you'll be able to
edit/clarify/correct these notes, add your name to attendee lists,
etc.
Please ask Michael or Spencer if you have questions.

2023 virtual interim meeting dates

Please note our 2023 dates listed at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cellar/meetings/

Agenda Items

Note Well:

https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/
Please be KIND to each other.

Roll call

Attendees

Spencer Dawkins
Martijn van Beurden
Steve Lhomme
Jérôme Martinez
ALI Shamin

Regrets

Michael Richardson

The Working Group extends congratulations to Michael for his son's
graduation!

Accept draft minutes from previous meeting

Draft minutes for the previous meeting are available here
Martijn and Steve have reviewed, no objections, so meeting minutes
are approved.

WG status update

Milestone review:

Can the authors post updated versions of our expired working group
drafts? Steve will submit updates
For Matroska, we need to resolve the remaining Discuss ballots, and
address comments we've received
For FLAC, we are awaiting our AD's evaluation write-up for this
draft

Matroska issues - Discussion of IESG Ballot positions and comments on the call.

John Scudder Discuss position - Steve thinks he has addressed all of
John's Discuss points and comments
Roman Danyliw Discuss position - Steve thinks he has addressed all
of Roman's Discuss points and comments
Other remaining AD comments received - Steve thinks he has addressed
all of these as well
Michael has sent a followup email asking the ADs to review Discuss
positions against -17
- Spencer will follow up with ADs, on Michael's June 4 email

Review of RFC8794 GitHub structure

At our previous meeting, Steve reported that he has worked through
the GitHub repo for our previously published RFC 8794, with the RFC
8794 with errata applied at
https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/ebml-specification/tree/rfc8794
with a release ZIP file at
https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/ebml-specification/releases/tag/rfc8794-errata-9
At our previous meeting, Spencer asked the working group
participants to look at this GitHub structure and make sure we think
it will work for us
Does anyone see any problems with this structure? Martijn thinks it
looks wonderful
The GitHub repo has lots of stale branches - the structure would be
even more wonderful if they were removed
We could fork the repo, so we have any older branches that we might
need, and then delete them from the main repo
Are we ready to do the same thing with RFC 9043? We think our
approach is good for other RFCs, but RFC 9043 has no errata at this
time

FLAC issues - Discussion on the call

No update required until we get the AD Evaluation comments back from
Murray
Private email from Murray - "expecting to finish this coming Friday
(but ping me to keep me honest)"
Murray requested an early ART ART review, and this is one month
overdue.
Spencer will follow up with Cullen Jennings, the ART ART reviewer

FFV1 v4 issues - Discussion on the call

No updates, check back in August

AOB?

None noted
Next meeting is ** 2023-08-22**