# IETF/IEEE 802 Coordination Meeting, 2023-02-24 {#ietfieee-802-coordination-meeting-2023-02-24} ## 1. Welcome, roll call, agenda bashing {#1-welcome-roll-call-agenda-bashing} Present: * Alvaro Retana * Cindy Morgan * Dan Romascanu * Donald Eastlake * Dorothy Stanley * Éric Vyncke * Erik Kline * János Farkas * John Scudder * Michael Richardson * Paul Congdon * Russ Housley * Suresh Krishnan ## 2. Action items {#2-action-items} Done: * 2022-10-19: Dorothy Stanley to forward Rob Wilton's email looking for a designated expert to help update the MAU MIB with new 802.3 media types to the 802.3 chair and ask for a recommendation. In Progress: * 2022-06-21: Rob Wilton to send a liaison from the NETCONF WG to 802.1 about security coordination for draft-ietf-netconf-keystore. * 2023-02-24: Cindy Morgan to ask Rob Wilton for an update on this. New: * 2023-02-24: Dorothy Stanley and János Farkos to follow up with Pascal Thubert about a possible tutorial on RAW during the July 802.11 plenary meeting. ## 3. [IETF New Work Summary][1] {#3-ietf-new-work-summary} ### BPF/eBPF (BPF) - Internet Area {#bpfebpf-bpf---internet-area} Russ Housley noted that the BPF BOF is probably the BOF of most interest to 802. eBPF is a technology with origins in the Linux kernel that can run sandboxed programs in a privileged context such as the operating system kernel. If chartered, the BPF working group will be tasked with documenting the existing state of the eBPF ecosystem, and a clear process for extensions, including initial extension that are widely useful and showcase the process. ### Computing-Aware Networking (CAN) - Routing Area {#computing-aware-networking-can---routing-area} This is a placeholder BOF for a Working Group that is likely to be chartered before IETF 116. John Scudder said that he does not think it is relevant to 802. ### Domain Boundaries (DBOUND2) - Applications and Real-Time Area {#domain-boundaries-dbound2---applications-and-real-time-area} This BOF will discuss whether to re-open the DBOUND Working Group to work on a problem statement for DNS administrative boundaries. ### Key Transparency (KEYTRANS) - Security Area {#key-transparency-keytrans---security-area} This BOF will discuss ways to standardize a safe, publicly-auditable way to distribute cryptographically-sensitive data like public keys. ### Structured Email (SML) - Applications and Real-Time Area {#structured-email-sml---applications-and-real-time-area} The goal of structured email is to replace or extend text-based email messages with message parts that describe content in a machine-readable way. ### vCon (VCON) - Applications and Real-Time Area {#vcon-vcon---applications-and-real-time-area} The VCON BOF will discuss chartering a working group will define a standard container for conversation data and specify mechanisms to ensure the integrity and privacy of the data in the container. ## 4. [802 New Work Summary][2] {#4-802-new-work-summary} ### 802.1CS-2020/Cor 1- Link-local Registration Protocol - Corrigendum 1 Corrections to Management Modules and Protocol Encoding, PAR modification {#8021cs-2020cor-1--link-local-registration-protocol---corrigendum-1-corrections-to-management-modules-and-protocol-encoding-par-modification} This is a modification to an existing PAR to correct errors in the YANG module, SNMP MIB and TLV encoding. ### 802.1ASdm - Amendment: Hot Standby and Clock Drift Error Reduction, PAR modification and CSD {#8021asdm---amendment-hot-standby-and-clock-drift-error-reduction-par-modification-and-csd} This amendment specifies protocols, procedures, and managed objects for hot standby without use of the Best Master Clock Algorithm (BMCA), for time-aware systems, including: * A function that transforms the synchronized times of two generalized Precision Time Protocol (gPTP) domains into one synchronized time for use by applications; * A function that directs the synchronized time of one gPTP domain into a different gPTP domain; and- Mechanisms that determine whether a gPTP domain has sufficient quality to be used for hot standby. This amendment specifies a Type-Length-Value (TLV) that allows more accurate neighbor rate ratio calculation and more accurate tracking of clock frequency drift. This amendment also addresses errors and omissions in the description of existing ### 802.1Qdt - Amendment: Priority-based Flow Control Enhancements, PAR modification and CSD {#8021qdt---amendment-priority-based-flow-control-enhancements-par-modification-and-csd} This amendment specifies procedures and managed objects for automated Priority-based Flow Control (PFC) headroom calculation and Media Access Control Security (MACsec) protection of PFC frames, using point-to-point roundtrip measurement and enhancements to the Data Center Bridging Capability Exchange protocol (DCBX). This amendment places emphasis on the requirements for low latency and lossless transmission in large-scale and geographically dispersed data centers.This amendment also addresses errors of the existing IEEE Std 802.1Q functionality. ### 802.1Qdx - Amendment: YANG Data Models for the Credit-Based Shaper, PAR and CSD {#8021qdx---amendment-yang-data-models-for-the-credit-based-shaper-par-and-csd} This amendment specifies a Unified Modeling Language (UML)-based information model and YANG data models that allow configuration and status reporting for bridges and end stations (as specified by this standard) with the capabilities currently specified for the credit-based shaper algorithm (8.6.8.2) of this standard for the per-traffic class queues. It further defines the relationship between the information and data model and models for the other management capabilities specified in this standard. ### 802.1DU - Standard: Cut-Through Forwarding Bridges and Bridged Networks, PAR and CSD {#8021du---standard-cut-through-forwarding-bridges-and-bridged-networks-par-and-csd} This standard specifies Cut-Through Forwarding (CTF) bridges based on the IEEE 802.1Q bridge architecture, including protocols, procedures, and managed objects. CTF bridges interconnect individual local area networks (LANs) using different or identical media access control (MAC) methods with and without support for CTF. This standard also details the usage of CTF bridges. ## 5. Review current coordination items {#5-review-current-coordination-items} ### Item 5. Enabling use of Local Addresses for virtualization and IoT {#item-5-enabling-use-of-local-addresses-for-virtualization-and-iot} Paul Congdon said that a liaison on draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis is expected before IETF 116. If there is no further coordination on this topic, the group will consider closing this item at their next meeting. ### Item 25. Layer 2/Layer 3 Interaction for Time-Sensitive Traffic {#item-25-layer-2layer-3-interaction-for-time-sensitive-traffic} János Farkas reported that draft-ietf-detnet-scaling-requirements was adopted in December 2022. The DETNET WG is planning a virtual interim meeting on 2023-03-07. The TSN Task Group is wrapping up work on a couple of documents. IEEE 802.1qcz is finishing ballot comment resolution, and IEEE 802.1qcw will start recirculation ballot shortly. ## Item 27. Development of YANG models in the IEEE 802 {#item-27-development-of-yang-models-in-the-ieee-802} Cindy Morgan will check with Rob Wilton about sending a liaison back from the NETCONF WG to 802.1 on security coordination for draft-ietf-netconf-keystore. ## Item 33. Capability Discovery {#item-33-capability-discovery} Alvaro Retana reported that the L3DL work had been on hold in the LSVR WG until group could finish other work. He expects to see a recharter of the LSVR WG to include the L3DL work sometime after IETF 116. ## Item 34. Reliable and Available Wireless (RAW) {#item-34-reliable-and-available-wireless-raw} The group discussed whether this item should be closed due to lack of energy, but agreed to keep it open because the RAW archictecture draft is still a hot topic; reviewers for this document are still needed. Dorothy Stanley proposed scheduling a tutorial on RAW for 802.11 during their July plenary meeting. Dorothy Stanley and János Farkas will follow up with Pascal Thubert about a possible tutorial. ## Item 35. MAC Address Device Identification for Network and Application Services (MADINAS) {#item-35-mac-address-device-identification-for-network-and-application-services-madinas} Éric Vyncke reported that the MADINAS WG has been fairly quiet, but this item should remain open to coordinate MADINAS with P802.1, P802.11bh, and P802.11bi. ## Future meeting plans {#future-meeting-plans} Russ Housley said that there do not appear to be any hot topics requiring a face-to-face meeting at IETF 116. Dorothy Stanley agreed. Russ Housley said that he does think that trying to schedule a tutorial on RAW at the 802 meeting in July is a good idea. Éric Vyncke suggested that it might be helpful to present a brief introduction on SNAC to 802 in July as well. ## Adjourn {#adjourn} [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/bofs/ [2]: https://ieee802.org/PARs.shtml