MIMI Interim 2023-09-28

Note-taker: matthew@matrix.org
Agenda bashing: none

ekr:

rlbarnes:

ekr:

rlb:

rohan:

ekr:

rlb: Yup. next slide!

alissa:

rlb:

rohan:

tim:

rlb:

ekr:

rlb:

konrad:

matthew: For the transitional benefits, I think there is an opportunity
to make the lego blocks interchangable, to help facilitate upkeep of the
protocol. Which helps stops the risk of gatekeepers implementing their
own API for DMA compliance, or some interim solution that doesn't have
the traction of something like MIMI. But if MIMI can support those
transitional use cases, it has a much higher chance of being adopted.

alissa: do you propose any changes to the decoupling that was described?

matthew: I think the proposed decoupling is good. but the "MLS-shaped
hole" terminology might lead to only MLS being able to fit the slot,
instead of protocols that may be more transition-friendly.

ekr:

Over to Konrad & Travis...

Travis:

Scenario 1 Alice adds Bob

rohan:

konrad:

...and now MLS layer gets distributed.

rlbarnes:

konrad:

rlbarnes:

ekr:

konrad:

ekr:

konrad:

ekr:

konrad:

rlbarnes:

ekr:

rlbarnes:

konrad:

Scenario 2: Alice wants to leave.

Slide 33-35: signalling flow

travis

slide 36-39: MLS flow

rlbarnes:

konrad:

basel:

travis:

basel:

konrad:

rlbarnes:

konrad:

ekr:

konrad:

ekr:

konrad:

rlbarnes:

matthew:

ekr:

rlbarnes:

alissa:

tim:

konrad:

travis:

ekr:

rlbarnes:

alissa:

rlbarnes:

alissa:

matthew:

rlbarnes:

ekr:

matthew:

konrad:

alissa:

rlbarnes:

ekr:

matthew:

rohan:

alissa:

rlbarnes:

alissa:

tim:

alissa:

rohan: