[{"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>+1 to the copy being automatic or manual</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T14:16:15Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>I also think that configuration in running should <em>always</em> override what it is in system, or otherwise the server should reject the configuration if the server doesn't allow the system configuration to be overridden with a different value.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T14:18:49Z"}, {"author": "Qin Wu", "text": "<p>Tend to agree with Jason to have a few brief examples in the bracket.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T14:41:27Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>For this second issue, I think that there is a third choice which is that we don't specify the behaviour here, but rely on existing RFC, and maybe change it in a future version of YANG.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T14:57:40Z"}, {"author": "Reshad Rahman", "text": "<p>I have to drop now. Thank you Quifang and WG.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:02:04Z"}, {"author": "Kent Watsen", "text": "<p>@Rob, can you clarify what \"this second issue\" points to?</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:02:48Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>@Kent, the issue that we are currently discussing.  I.e., whether running has to always be explicitly valid.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:04:49Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>I.e., I don't think that this draft should say \"running must always be valid\" since that it stated elsewhere anywhere</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:05:19Z"}, {"author": "Jason Sterne", "text": "<p>Rob - don't the quotes that Qiufang presented show that running is stated as being valid?</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:06:00Z"}, {"author": "Kent Watsen", "text": "<p>&lt;just trying to ensure chat-comments make sense after the call&gt;</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:06:01Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>@Jason, yes, but to your point, I think that many servers ignore this around the corner cases.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:06:35Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>But ideally you don't really want to copy those certificates into running.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:17:50Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>Ideally you want the references to the certificates and keys</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:18:24Z"}, {"author": "Per Andersson", "text": "<p>I have to drop. Thank you Quifang and WG!</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:35:46Z"}, {"author": "Lou Berger", "text": "<p>I'm having mic issues, but thank you all for contributing to the session</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:53:42Z"}, {"author": "Lou Berger", "text": "<p>Agreed, could be done in bis</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:54:46Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>For clarity, I think that this doc should perhaps update RFC 8342 to clarify the system origin handling, if necessary, and how system flows into intended for validation purposes.</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:56:02Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>Thanks all for the participation and discussion</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:57:05Z"}, {"author": "Lou Berger", "text": "<p>Thanks again all</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:57:06Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>Thanks Qiufang for being on the spot for 2 hours!</p>", "time": "2024-01-23T15:57:28Z"}]