[{"start_time": "2025-09-30T12:42:33.201Z", "end_time": "2025-09-30T12:44:07.470Z", "text": "We should limit search to being a carve-out to assure that preferences do not affect it", "yes": 11, "no": 16, "no_opinion": 8, "present_when_poll_closed": 43}, {"start_time": "2025-09-30T12:44:17.451Z", "end_time": "2025-09-30T12:46:55.159Z", "text": "We should define more fine-grained search (and other) controls", "yes": 22, "no": 7, "no_opinion": 6, "present_when_poll_closed": 42}, {"start_time": "2025-09-30T14:29:09.977Z", "end_time": "2025-09-30T14:30:33.137Z", "text": "Can you live with shipping a vocabulary that includes a top-level preference?", "yes": 18, "no": 11, "no_opinion": 3, "present_when_poll_closed": 39}, {"start_time": "2025-09-30T14:30:41.816Z", "end_time": "2025-09-30T14:32:04.959Z", "text": "Can you live with shipping a vocabulary that excludes a top-level preference?", "yes": 16, "no": 7, "no_opinion": 6, "present_when_poll_closed": 38}]