[{"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>What is that BCP #?</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T17:04:40.000Z"}, {"author": "Kaixuan Luo", "text": "<p>BCP 240</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T17:05:27.000Z"}, {"author": "Hannes Tschofenig", "text": "<p><a href=\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9700/\">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9700/</a></p>", "time": "2025-09-29T17:05:48.000Z"}, {"author": "mblackmo", "text": "<p>Good and important work. Clear explanations. Thank you.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T17:53:28.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>That sounds like an update?</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:00:59.000Z"}, {"author": "Hannes Tschofenig", "text": "<p>I think so.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:01:08.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>although I can see an option to just add to the BCP without necessarily updating 9700.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:01:34.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>In this case, it sounds like an update would be the most appropriate.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:01:52.000Z"}, {"author": "Pieter Kasselman", "text": "<p>We will forvere be discovering new issues, so perhaps some kind of mechanism for updating the existing BCP?</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:01:57.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>you can always add RFCs to the BCP, so that shouldn't be an issue.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:02:20.000Z"}, {"author": "Brian Campbell", "text": "<p>^ that is what I've been in q to ask/say</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:02:39.000Z"}, {"author": "Pieter Kasselman", "text": "<p>\"new feature\"</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:03:28.000Z"}, {"author": "Pieter Kasselman", "text": "<p>So the BCP stays at 9700, but it keeps pointingg to new RFCs?</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:04:43.000Z"}, {"author": "Brian Campbell", "text": "<p>i think so</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:04:54.000Z"}, {"author": "Brian Campbell", "text": "<p>it's like an AND</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:04:59.000Z"}, {"author": "Brian Campbell", "text": "<p>9700 and RFC-to-be</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:05:08.000Z"}, {"author": "Brian Campbell", "text": "<p>that's a fair way to look at it too, i think</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:06:19.000Z"}, {"author": "Pieter Kasselman", "text": "<p>So you can point to 9700, and it means all the RFCs that gets added over time?</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:06:24.000Z"}, {"author": "Brian Campbell", "text": "<p>\"that's\" being what Filip just said</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:06:42.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>you point to BCP240 and you get all the RFCs within it</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:06:45.000Z"}, {"author": "Pieter Kasselman", "text": "<p>Gotcha</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:07:27.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>Look at BCP 9 - it has a bunch of RFCs under it.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:08:42.000Z"}, {"author": "Deb Cooley", "text": "<p>If mitigations exist, those are worth publishing.</p>", "time": "2025-09-29T18:09:27.000Z"}]