Common Control and Measurement Plane (ccamp)
WG | Name | Common Control and Measurement Plane | |
---|---|---|---|
Acronym | ccamp | ||
Area | Routing Area (rtg) | ||
State | Active | ||
Charter | charter-ietf-ccamp-08-01 Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) | ||
Document dependencies | |||
Additional resources |
Additional CCAMP Web Page Issue tracker Wiki Zulip Stream |
||
Personnel | Chairs | Daniele Ceccarelli, Fatai Zhang, Luis M. Contreras | |
Area Director | John Scudder | ||
Secretary | Haomian Zheng | ||
Mailing list | Address | ccamp@ietf.org | |
To subscribe | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp | ||
Archive | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/ | ||
Chat | Room address | https://zulip.ietf.org/#narrow/stream/ccamp |
Charter for Working Group
The CCAMP working group is responsible for standardizing a common
control plane and a separate common measurement plane for non-packet
technologies found in the Internet and in the networks of telecom
service providers (ISPs and SPs). Examples of the devices in such
networks include photonic cross-connects, OEO switches, ROADMs, TDM
switches, microwave links, and Ethernet switches.
In this context, measurement refers to the acquisition and
distribution of attributes relevant to the setting up of tunnels
and paths.
The working group develops extensions to core Traffic Engineering
protocols that are under the care of other working groups. The CCAMP
working group will coordinate with the TEAS working group to ensure
that extensions that can be generalized for use with more than one
technology are made appropriately, and with the working groups that
have responsibility for the specific protocols.
CCAMP WG work scope includes:
-
Definition of protocol-independent metrics and parameters
(measurement attributes) for describing links and paths that are
required for routing and signaling in technology-specific
networks. These will be developed in conjunction with requests
and requirements from other WGs to ensure overall usefulness. -
Maintenance and extension of the Link Management Protocol (LMP).
-
Functional specification of extensions for GMPLS-related routing
(OSPF, ISIS) and signaling (RSVP-TE) protocols required for path
establishment and maintenance in non-packet, technology-specific
networks. Protocol formats and procedures that embody these
extensions will be done jointly with the WGs supervising those
protocols and the TEAS working group has the responsibility to
determine whether such protocol extensions should be generalized
for Traffic Engineering in any network.
This may include protocol work to support data planes that have
already been approved by another Standards Development
Organization. Note that the specification or modification of data
planes is out of scope of this working group
-
Definition of management objects (e.g., as part of MIB modules
or YANG models) and control of OAM techniques relevant to the
protocols and extensions specified within the WG. The OAM work
will be synchronized with the LIME WG -
Describe non-packet-specific aspects of traffic engineering
including for multi-areas/multi-AS/multi-layer scenarios and
define protocol extensions in cooperation with the TEAS and
PCE working groups. -
Define how the properties of network resources gathered by a
measurement protocol (or by other means such as configuration)
can be distributed in existing routing protocols, such as OSPF,
IS-IS, and BGP-LS. CCAMP will work with the WGs that supervise
these
The CCAMP WG currently works on the following tasks:
-
Protocol extensions in support of WSON.
-
Protocol extensions in support of flexible grid lambda networks.
-
Maintenance of existing protocol extensions for non-packet
technology-specific networks (Ethernet, TDM, OTN) already
specified by CCAMP. -
Maintenance of LMP.
Milestones
Date | Milestone | Associated documents |
---|---|---|
Aug 2023 | Submit client signal YANG model to IESG for review | |
Mar 2023 | Submit DWDM interface LMP and YANG to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp
|
Feb 2023 | Submit OTN slicing YANG model to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing
|
Feb 2023 | Submit WSON IV info to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info
|
Dec 2022 | Submit YANG model of WSON Impairment Topology YANG model to IESG for review; |
draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang
|
Dec 2022 | Submit Info Model for WSON with impairments validation to IESG for review | |
Nov 2022 | Submit Microwave topology model to IESG for review |
rfc9656 (was draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-topo-yang)
|
Nov 2022 | Submit OTN tunnel model to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-tunnel-model
|
Oct 2022 | First version of client signal performance monitoring YANG model working group draft |
draft-zheng-ccamp-client-pm-yang
|
Sep 2022 | Submit DWDM Interface YANG model to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang
|
Aug 2022 | First version of client tunnel YANG model working group draft |
draft-zheng-ccamp-client-tunnel-yang
|
Aug 2022 | Submit L1CSM YANG model to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang
|
Jul 2022 | Submit YANG model of Layer 1 Types to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types
|
Jul 2022 | Submit YANG model of OTN topology & Flexi-grid topology to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang
|
Jul 2022 | Submit WSON tunnel YANG model to IESG for review | |
Jul 2022 | First version of YANG model of Ethernet Tunnel Working Group drafts |
draft-zheng-ccamp-client-tunnel-yang
|
Jun 2022 | Submit T-NBI model applicability to IESG for review |
draft-ietf-ccamp-transport-nbi-app-statement
|
May 2022 | Submit YANG modelling for flexi grid draft to IESG for review |
Done milestones
Date | Milestone | Associated documents |
---|---|---|
Done | Submit applicability of gmpls to OTN beyond 100G to IETF for review |
rfc9376 (was draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability)
|
Done | First version of OTN network slicing working group draft |
draft-zheng-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing
|
Done | First version of YANG model of Ethernet Topology Working Group drafts |
draft-ietf-ccamp-eth-client-te-topo-yang
|
Done | Recharter or close Working Group | |
Done | Submit technology specific version of signaling and routing bandwidth availability draft to IESG for review | |
Done | Submit flexi grid label, signaling and routing extensions to IESG for review | |
Done | First version of YANG modelling for flexi grid Working Group draft | |
Done | First draft of technology specific version of signaling and routing bandwidth availability working group draft. | |
Done | Submit flexi grid framework to IESG for review | |
Done | Submit OTN signal types update and sub registry drafts to IESG for review | |
Done | Submit WSON routing related drafts for IESG review | |
Done | Submit WSON signaling related draft for IESG review | |
Done | Submit first set of OAM configuration solutions for IESG review | |
Done | Submit last OAM configuration solutions for IESG review | |
Done | First version flexigrid requirements/framework Working Group draft | |
Done | Submit G.709 enhancements framework for IESG review | |
Done | Submit G.709 enhancements solutions for IESG review | |
Done | Submit OAM configuration framework for IESG review | |
Done | Submit LMP Negotiation for IESG review | |
Done | Submit RSVP-TE extensions for MPLS-TP for IESG review | |
Done | Submit Control Plane Framework for MPLS-TP for IESG review | |
Done | First version of Working Group draft defining RSVP-TE extensions for MPLS-TP | |
Done | First version of G.709 enhancements solutions Working Group drafts | |
Done | Submit WSON impairment framework draft for IESG review | |
Done | Submit WSON framework draft for IESG review | |
Done | Submit Lambda labels draft for IESG review | |
Done | First version of OAM configuration solutions Working Group draft | |
Done | First version of Working Group draft providing Control Plane Framework for MPLS-TP | |
Done | First version of G.709 enhancements framework Working Group drafts | |
Done | First version of LMP Negotiation Working Group draft | |
Done | Submit TE MIB module IESG review | |
Done | Submit VCAT/LCAS with GMPLS for IESG review | |
Done | Submit hierarchy bis for IESG review | |
Done | Submit Ethernet related drafts for IESG review | |
Done | First version of WSON routing related Working Group drafts | |
Done | Submit Protocol solutions for MLN/MRN I-D for IESG review | |
Done | First version WG I-Ds for GMPLS source-controlled and explicitly-routed Ethernet networks | |
Done | Submit Informational I-D for Analysis of inter-domain issues for disjoint and protected paths for IESG review | |
Done | Submit Evaluation of existing protocols for MLN/MRN for IESG review | |
Done | Submit MPLS-GMPLS interworking requirements and solutions I-D for IESG review | |
Done | Submit Requirements for Multi-Layer and Multi-Region Networks I-D for IESG review | |
Done | Submit MPLS to GMPLS migration strategies I-D for IESG review | |
Done | Submit GMPLS routing and signaling interoperability advice I-D for IESG review | |
Done | Submit I-D for Automatic discovery of MPLS-TE mesh membership for IESG review | |
Done | First version WG I-D GMPLS OAM Requirements | |
Done | Submit LSP Stitching I-D for IESG review | |
Done | Submit GMPLS/ASON lexicography I-D for IESG review | |
Done | First version WG I-D MPLS-GMPLS interworking requirements and solutions | |
Done | First version of WG I-D for OSPF-TE/GMPLS MIB module | |
Done | First version WG I-D for Protocol solutions for MLN/MRN | |
Done | Submit I-D for Advertising TE Node Capabilities in ISIS and OSPF for IESG review | |
Done | Submit GMPLS signaling in support of Call Management I-D for IESG review | |
Done | First version WG Informational I-D for Analysis of inter-domain issues for disjoint and protected paths | |
Done | Submit RSVP-TE extensions for inter-domain signaling I-D for IESG review | |
Done | Submit Per-domain path computation signaling I-D for IESG review | |
Done | First version WG I-D Requirements for Multi-Layer and Multi-Region Networks | |
Done | First version of WG I-D for ASON Routing solutions | |
Done | First version WG I-D for Evaluation of existing protocols for MLN/MRN | |
Done | Cross-WG review of I-D for Advertising TE Node Capabilities in ISIS and OSPF | |
Done | First version WG I-D MPLS to GMPLS migration strategies | |
Done | Submit ASON Routing evaluation I-D for IESG review | |
Done | First version WG I-D for Automatic discovery of MPLS-TE mesh membership | |
Done | First version WG I-D for Advertising TE Node Capabilities in ISIS and OSPF | |
Done | Submit revised charter and milestones to IESG for IESG consideration of more detailed deliverables and determination of usefulness of continuation of WG | |
Done | Produce CCAMP WG document for generic tunnel tracing protocol | |
Done | Produce CCAMP WG document for multi-area/AS signaling and routing | |
Done | Submit ASON routing requirements doc to IESG | |
Done | Submit GMPLS MIBs to IESG | |
Done | Submit protection & restoration documents to IESG | |
Done | Submit ASON signaling requirements doc to IESG | |
Done | Submit LMP MIB to IESG | |
Done | Submit WG document defining common measurement plane protocol | |
Done | Submit WG document defining path setup portions of common control plane protocol | |
Done | Build appropriate design teams | |
Done | Post strawman WG goals and charter | |
Done | Identify and document a limited set of candidate solutions for signalling and for measurement. Among candidate control solutions to be considered are the existing GMPLS drafts. |