Concluded WG Next Steps in Signaling (nsis)
Note: The data for concluded WGs is occasionally incorrect.
|WG||Name||Next Steps in Signaling|
|Area||Transport Area (tsv)|
|Personnel||Chairs||Jukka Manner, Martin Stiemerling|
|Liaison Contact||John A. Loughney|
Final Charter for Working Group
The Next Steps in Signaling Working Group is responsible for
standardizing an IP signaling protocol with QoS signaling as the first
use case. This working group will concentrate on a two-layer
signaling paradigm. The intention is to re-use, where appropriate,
the protocol mechanisms of RSVP, while at the same time simplifying it
and applying a more general signaling model.
The existing work on the requirements, the framework and analysis of
existing protocols will be completed and used as input for the
NSIS will develop a transport layer signaling protocol for the
transport of upper layer signaling. In order to support a toolbox or
building block approach, the two-layer model will be used to separate
the transport of the signaling from the application signaling. This
allows for a more general signaling protocol to be developed to
support signaling for different services or resources, such as NAT &
firewall traversal and QoS resources. The initial NSIS application
will be an optimized RSVP QoS signaling protocol. The second
application will be a middle box traversal protocol. An informational
document detailing how Differentiated Services can be signaled
with the QoS Signaling protocol will be made.
Security is a very important concern for NSIS. The working group will
study and analyze the threats and security requirements for
signaling. Compatibility with authentication and authorization
mechanisms such as those of Diameter, COPS for RSVP (RFC 2749) and
RSVP Session Authorization (RFC 3250), will be addressed.
It is a non-goal of the working group to develop new resource
allocation protocols. Traffic engineering is out of scope of this
WG. Additionally, third party signaling is out of scope of this WG.
New mobility and AAA protocols are out of scope of the WG.
However, the work produced in this Working Group should work with
existing IETF mobility and AAA protocols, including (but not limited
Mobile IP, Seanoby Context Transfer, etc. An applicability statement
will be written to discuss the applicability of NSIS protocols in
NSIS also welcomes participation and expression of requirements
requirements from non-IETF standards organization members, for
instance 3GPP, 3GPP2 and ITU-T.
|Done||Submit 'NSIS Operation Over IP Tunnels' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'SCTP transport for GIST' to the IESG for publication as an Experimental RFC|
|Done||Submit 'NSIS Extensibility Model' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'GIST State Machine' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'Applicability Statement of NSIS Protocols in Mobile Environments' to the IESG as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'Y.1541 QoS Model' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'NSIS Middle Box Signaling Application Protocol' to IESG for publication as Experimental RFC|
|Done||Submit 'NSIS QoS Application Protocol' to IESG for publication as Experimental RFC|
|Done||Submit 'NSIS QoS Specification Template' to IESG for publication as an Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'NSIS Transport Protocol' to IESG for publication as Experimental RFC|
|Done||Submit 'NSIS Threats' to IESG as Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'RSVP Security Properties' to IESG as Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'Analysis of Existing Signaling Protocols' to IESG as Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'Next Steps in Signaling: Framework' to IESG for publication as Informational RFC|
|Done||Submit 'Signaling Requirements' to IESG for publication as an Informational RFC.|