This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic.
Abstract:
New fields are occasionally added to civic addresses. A backward- compatible
mechanism for adding civic address elements to the Geopriv civic address format is described. A
formal mechanism for handling unsupported extensions when translating between XML and DHCP civic address forms
is defined for entities that need to perform this translation. Initial extensions for
some new elements are also defined. The Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) protocol mechanism (defined
in RFC 5222) that returns civic address element names used for validation of
location information is clarified and is normatively updated to require a qualifying
namespace identifier on each civic address element returned as part of the validation
process. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Authors:
James Winterbottom <james.winterbottom@commscope.com>
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Robins George <robinsgv@gmail.com>
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)
datatracker.ietf.org