datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.6.2.p5, 2014-08-04
Report a bug

IESG Agenda: 2014-08-21

See also: Documents on Future IESG Telechat Agendas and IESG Discuss Positions.

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of Past Telechats

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: August 21, 2014

  o Martin Stiemerling to find a designated expert for the 
    Straightforward-NAPTR (S-NAPTR) Parameters registry.

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Items

draft-ietf-core-observe [txt] - IETF stream
Observing Resources in CoAP (Proposed Standard)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-paws-protocol [txt] - IETF stream
Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases (Proposed Standard)
Note: This document had a second Last Call. There are unlikely to be more Last Call comments, so feel free to review before Last Call completes.
IPR:

Token: Pete Resnick (app area)
IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
Consensus: Yes

2.1.2 Returning Items

NONE

2.1.3 For Action

draft-ietf-l3vpn-pmsi-registry [txt] - IETF stream
IANA registry for PMSI Tunnel Type code points (Proposed Standard)
Token: Adrian Farrel (rtg area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch [txt] - IETF stream
JSON Merge Patch (Proposed Standard)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus: Yes

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Items

NONE

2.2.2 Returning Items

NONE

2.3 Status Changes

2.3.1 New Items

NONE

2.3.2 Returning Items

NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Items

draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only [txt] - IETF stream
Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network (Informational)
Token: Joel Jaeggli (ops area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis [txt] - IETF stream
AS112 Nameserver Operations (Informational)
Token: Joel Jaeggli (ops area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname [txt] - IETF stream
AS112 Redirection using DNAME (Informational)
Token: Joel Jaeggli (ops area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-core-groupcomm [txt] - IETF stream
Group Communication for CoAP (Informational)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Unknown

3.1.2 Returning Items

NONE

3.1.3 For Action

draft-ietf-tcpm-fastopen [txt] - IETF stream
TCP Fast Open (Experimental)
Token: Martin Stiemerling (tsv area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Unknown
draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements [txt] - IETF stream
Security Requirements of Time Protocols in Packet Switched Networks (Informational)
Token: Brian Haberman (int area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems [txt] - IETF stream
Problems with STUN long-term Authentication for TURN (Informational)
Token: Spencer Dawkins (tsv area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Unknown

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Items

draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis [txt] - IETF stream
Analysis of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Security According to KARP Design Guide (Informational)
Note: Processing as AD Sponsored as KARP working group has closed down.
Token: Adrian Farrel (rtg area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes

3.2.2 Returning Items

NONE

3.3 Status Changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New Items

NONE

3.3.2 Returning Items

NONE

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses: 1) The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time; 4) The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or 5) The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New Items

conflict-review-cailleux-secure-headers-00 [txt]
IETF conflict review for draft-cailleux-secure-headers
draft-cailleux-secure-headers-06 [txt]
Securing Header Fields with S/MIME (ISE: Experimental)
Token: Barry Leiba

3.4.2 Returning Items

NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

Planning for the IANA/NTIA Transition (ianaplan)
Area: GEN (Jari Arkko)

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

Calendaring Extensions (calext)
Area: APP (Barry Leiba)

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

7. Working Group News