IESG agenda: 2015-09-03

Documents on future agendas DISCUSS positions

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: August 20, 2015

  o Stephen Farrell to draft a description of an experiment ethics 
    panel.

  o Ben Campbell to find a designated expert for RFC 5104 (Codec Control 
    Messages) [IANA #839440]

  o Barry Leiba to find a designated expert for RFC-ietf-scim-core-
    schema-22 [IANA #839815]
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265
Proposed Standard
RTP Payload Format for H.265/HEVC Video
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
IPR
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-01
Vidyo, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-02
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-04
Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-07

IETF stream
draft-ietf-precis-nickname
Proposed Standard
Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Nicknames
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data
Proposed Standard
Additional Data Related to an Emergency Call
Token
Alissa Cooper (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib
Proposed Standard
MPLS-TP Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM) Identifiers Management Information Base (MIB)
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld
Proposed Standard
The .onion Special-Use Domain Name
Token
Joel Jaeggli (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-httpbis-cice
Proposed Standard
Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Client-Initiated Content-Encoding
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-global-table-mcast
Proposed Standard
Global Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN Procedures
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tls-padding
Proposed Standard
A TLS ClientHello padding extension
Token
Stephen Farrell (SEC area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-hansen-scram-sha256
Proposed Standard
SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS SASL Mechanisms
Token
Stephen Farrell (NONE area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility
Best Current Practice
Guidelines for Cryptographic Algorithm Agility and Selecting Mandatory-to-Implement Algorithms
Token
Stephen Farrell (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-bradner-iaoc-terms
Best Current Practice
Updating the Definition of Term for IAOC Members
Token
Jari Arkko (GEN area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-precis-mappings
Informational
Mapping characters for PRECIS classes
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

3.1.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations
Informational
IRR & Routing Policy Configuration Considerations
Token
Joel Jaeggli (OPS area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-wkumari-dhc-capport
Informational
Captive-Portal Identification in DHCP / RA
Token
Joel Jaeggli (NONE area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker
Informational
Tracking Reviews of Documents
Token
Jari Arkko (GEN area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-savage-eigrp
IETF conflict review for draft-savage-eigrp
ISE Informational
draft-savage-eigrp
Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
Token
Alvaro Retana
IPR
Cisco's Statement of IPR Related to draft-savage-eigrp-00
Cisco Systems' Statement about IPR related to draft-savage-eigrp-01

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

WG name
Geographic JSON (geojson)
Charter
charter-ietf-geojson-(00-01)
Area
ART (Alissa Cooper)

WG name
Interface to Network Security Functions (i2nsf)
Charter
charter-ietf-i2nsf-(00-02)
Area
SEC (Kathleen Moriarty)

WG name
Deterministic Networking (detnet)
Charter
charter-ietf-detnet-(00-00)
Area
RTG (Deborah Brungard)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 Approve Designated Expert for RFC 5104 (Codec Control Messages) [IANA #839440] (Ben Campbell)

6.2 Leaving former WG chairs on wgchairs@ietf.org (Cindy Morgan)

6.3 Approve designated experts for SCIM registries (Barry Leiba)

6.4 Ethics Action Item (Stephen Farrell)

7. Working Group news