IESG agenda: 2015-05-28

Documents on future agendas DISCUSS positions

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: May 14, 2015

  o Kathleen Moriarty to find an expert for the OAuth Dynamic Client 
    Registration Metadata Registry, OAuth Token [IANA #823612].
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis
Internet Standard
Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
Proposed Standard
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage
Proposed Standard
Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC): Media Transport and Use of RTP
Token
Alissa Cooper (RAI area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Last call expires
2015-05-28

IETF stream
draft-ietf-siprec-protocol
Proposed Standard
Session Recording Protocol
Token
Alissa Cooper (RAI area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Unknown
IPR
Avaya Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-siprec-protocol-08

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation
Proposed Standard
Dynamic Allocation of Shared IPv4 Addresses
Token
Brian Haberman (INT area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
IPR
Orange's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth
Proposed Standard
The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Last call expires
2015-06-04

IETF stream
draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis
Proposed Standard
Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Usernames and Passwords
Token
Barry Leiba (APP area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Proposed Standard
STUN Usage for Consent Freshness
Token
Alissa Cooper (RAI area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe
Proposed Standard
Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters for TLS
Token
Stephen Farrell (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane
Proposed Standard
SMTP security via opportunistic DANE TLS
Token
Stephen Farrell (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix
Best Current Practice
IPv6 Prefix Length Recommendation for Forwarding
Token
Joel Jaeggli (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-video
Proposed Standard
WebRTC Video Processing and Codec Requirements
Token
Alissa Cooper (RAI area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Last call expires
2015-06-03

IETF stream
draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth
Proposed Standard
A set of SASL Mechanisms for OAuth
Token
Stephen Farrell (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology
Experimental
Multi-Topology Extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2)
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types
Informational
Requirements for pNFS Layout Types
Token
Martin Stiemerling (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes

IETF stream
draft-ietf-sfc-architecture
Informational
Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Last call expires
2015-05-25

IETF stream
draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management
Informational
Traffic Management Benchmarking
Token
Joel Jaeggli (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt
IETF conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt
ISE Experimental
draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt
Experimental Option for TCP Host Identification
Token
Martin Stiemerling

3.4.2 Returning items

Conflict review
conflict-review-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios
IETF conflict review for draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios
ISE Informational
draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios
Scenarios with Host Identification Complications
Token
Brian Haberman

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose)
Charter
charter-ietf-cose-(00-02)
Area
SEC (Kathleen Moriarty)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 NomCom job descriptions / desirable qualifications (Jari Arkko)

6.2 ART area creation (Jari Arkko)

6.3 [IANA #824370] Designated Expert for RFC-ietf-httpbis-http2-17 (Amanda Baber/IANA; Barry Leiba)

6.4 Approve IESG Statement on Internet-draft Authorship (Benoit Claise and Brian Haberman)

7. Working Group news