datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.13.0, 2015-03-25
Report a bug

IESG Agenda: 2015-04-09

See also: Documents on Future IESG Telechat Agendas and IESG Discuss Positions.

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of Past Telechats

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

OUTSTANDING TASKS

     Last updated: March 12, 2015

  o Adrian Farrel to find a Designated Expert for the remaining Layer 
    Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) registries [IANA #800512].

  o Ben Campbell and Barry Leiba to prepare for the initial discussion 
    of the IANAPLAN appeal in Dallas.

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Items

draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg [txt] - IETF stream
OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Proposed Standard)
Token: Kathleen Moriarty (sec area)
IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling [txt] - IETF stream
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (Proposed Standard)
Token: Deborah Brungard (rtg area)
IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg [txt] - IETF stream
Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes (Best Current Practice)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
Consensus: Unknown
draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry [txt] - IETF stream
Registry Specification for Mandatory Access Control (MAC) Security Label Formats (Proposed Standard)
Token: Martin Stiemerling (tsv area)
IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data [txt] - IETF stream
Returning Values from Forms: multipart/form-data (Proposed Standard)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed
Consensus: Unknown
Last call expires: 2015-04-06
draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs [txt] - IETF stream
Packet loss resiliency for Router Solicitations (Proposed Standard)
Token: Brian Haberman (int area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building [txt] - IETF stream
Applicability Statement: The use of the RPL protocol suite in Home Automation and Building Control (Proposed Standard)
IPR:

Token: Alvaro Retana (rtg area)
IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir [txt] - IETF stream
MVPN: Using Bidirectional P-Tunnels (Proposed Standard)
Token: Alvaro Retana (rtg area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis [txt] - IETF stream
Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication (Proposed Standard)
Token: Benoit Claise (ops area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info [txt] - IETF stream
The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication-Info and Proxy-Authentication-Info Response Header Fields (Proposed Standard)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed
Consensus: Unknown
Last call expires: 2015-04-02

2.1.2 Returning Items

NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Items

draft-klensin-smtp-521code [txt] - IETF stream
SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes (Proposed Standard)
Token: Barry Leiba (app area)
IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed
Consensus: Unknown
Last call expires: 2015-04-02

2.2.2 Returning Items

NONE

2.3 Status Changes

2.3.1 New Items

NONE

2.3.2 Returning Items

NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Items

draft-ietf-lmap-framework [txt] - IETF stream
A framework for Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance (LMAP) (Informational)
Token: Benoit Claise (ops area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases [txt] - IETF stream
Endpoint Security Posture Assessment - Enterprise Use Cases (Informational)
Token: Kathleen Moriarty (sec area)
IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery [txt] - IETF stream
NAI-based Dynamic Peer Discovery for RADIUS/TLS and RADIUS/DTLS (Experimental)
Token: Kathleen Moriarty (ops area)
IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management [txt] - IETF stream
OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol (Experimental)
Token: Kathleen Moriarty (sec area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes
draft-ietf-netext-pmip-qos-wifi [txt] - IETF stream
Mapping PMIPv6 QoS Procedures with WLAN QoS Procedures (Informational)
Token: Brian Haberman (int area)
IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus: Yes

3.1.2 Returning Items

NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Items

NONE

3.2.2 Returning Items

NONE

3.3 Status Changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New Items

NONE

3.3.2 Returning Items

NONE

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses: 1) The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time; 4) The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or 5) The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New Items

conflict-review-farinacci-lisp-rig-00 [txt]
IETF conflict review for draft-farinacci-lisp-rig
draft-farinacci-lisp-rig-05 [txt]
LISP-DDT Referral Internet Groper (RIG) (ISE: Experimental)
Token: Brian Haberman

3.4.2 Returning Items

NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

Domain Boundaries (dbound)
Area: APP (Barry Leiba)

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

L3VPN Service Model (l3sm)
Area: OPS (Benoit Claise)

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (tcpm)
Area: TSV (Martin Stiemerling)

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 L3SM (IESG Secretary)

7. Working Group News