datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

An Overview of the IETF Network Management Standards
draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-07

RFC
Document Stream: IETF
Last updated: 2012-03-20
Intended RFC status: Informational
Other versions: (expired, archived): plain text, pdf, html

IETF State: WG Document (opsawg)
Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup
Consensus:Unknown

IESG State: RFC 6632
IANA Action State: No IC 
On agenda of 2012-03-15 IESG telechat
Responsible AD: Ron Bonica
IESG Note: Christopher Liljenstolpe <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org> is the Document Shepherd.
Send notices to: opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds@tools.ietf.org

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds.

Abstract:
This document gives an overview of the IETF network management standards and summarizes existing and ongoing development of IETF Standards Track network management protocols and data models. The document refers to other overview documents, where they exist and classifies the standards for easy orientation. The purpose of this document is, on the one hand, to help system developers and users to select appropriate standard management protocols and data models to address relevant management needs. On the other hand, the document can be used as an overview and guideline by other Standard Development Organizations or bodies planning to use IETF management technologies and data models. This document does not cover Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) technologies on the data-path, e.g., OAM of tunnels, MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) OAM, and pseudowire as well as the corresponding management models. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Authors:
Mehmet Ersue <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)