Ballot for charter-ietf-jose
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
It seems that the use of MD URL makes the text difficult to read (probably a datatracker rendering issue). The 4th paragraph starting with "A multi-decade research activity..." is a little long (suggest to skip the first sentence). Having two sentences starting with "Some" makes this paragraph rather vague. Finally, once ZKP abbreviation is introduced, then let's use it. s/This group is chartered to work on the following deliverables/This group is chartered to work on the following goals/ as later in the charter "One or more of these goals may be combined into a single document" (which would make sense). About the CBOR encoding, should CDDL be mentioned ? Should CBOR WG be listed in the interested parties ?
Could I ask that you use Markdown "reference-style" links (https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/#reference-style-links) to improve the readability of the charter when viewed as plaintext?