Ballot for charter-ietf-quic
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-08 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
"The QUIC protocol need not be defined to enable each of these abilities, or enable them in the same way as they are enabled by TCP when used with TLS 1.3, but the working group must consider the impact of the protocol on network management practices, in line with RFC 7258." The way this is phrased makes it sound like RFC 7258 is about protocol impact on network management, which isn't the case. I would suggest dropping "in line with RFC 7258." Alternatively, you could say something like: "The QUIC protocol need not be defined to enable each of these abilities, or enable them in the same way as they are enabled by TCP when used with TLS 1.3, but the working group must consider the impact of the protocol on network management practices, reflecting the tensions described in RFC 7258."