Ballot for charter-ietf-sacm
Yes
No Objection
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
I am agreeing with Alvaro.
I do agree with Alvaro's question. It looks like they have a good amount of work well underway.
Agree with Alvaro. Setting a deadline for a re-charter and then having the only change to the charter be a change to the date seems pointless. Also, if the only thing changing is the date, does the charter really need to go for external review?
I hold no particular position concerning the use of an expiration date, but I share Alissa's question about whether a recharter that just changes a date really needs external review.
I am not opposed to the work for which the sacm WG is chartered. I think it is important and look forward to the output. However, this specific update to the Charter only refreshes the expiration date for the WG — which is being used as a tool to manage its progress. I don't see the threat of expiration as an effective tool and would not want the practice to spread to other WGs. As a result I am ABSTAINing.