Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring
charter-ietf-sacm-03
Yes
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Stephen Farrell)
No Objection
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
Abstain
- Ready for external review (00-04)
- Approve (00-13)
- Ready for external review (01-00)
- Approve (02-00)
- Ready for external review (02-00)
- Approve (02-02)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-03 for -01-00)
Unknown
I am agreeing with Alvaro.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-03 for -01-00)
Unknown
I do agree with Alvaro's question. It looks like they have a good amount of work well underway.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-03 for -01-00)
Unknown
Agree with Alvaro. Setting a deadline for a re-charter and then having the only change to the charter be a change to the date seems pointless. Also, if the only thing changing is the date, does the charter really need to go for external review?
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-03 for -01-00)
Unknown
I hold no particular position concerning the use of an expiration date, but I share Alissa's question about whether a recharter that just changes a date really needs external review.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
(was Block)
Abstain
Abstain
(2016-08-03 for -01-00)
Unknown
I am not opposed to the work for which the sacm WG is chartered. I think it is important and look forward to the output. However, this specific update to the Charter only refreshes the expiration date for the WG — which is being used as a tool to manage its progress. I don't see the threat of expiration as an effective tool and would not want the practice to spread to other WGs. As a result I am ABSTAINing.