Network Working Group                           A. Brusilovsky
Internet-Draft                                  I. Faynberg
Expires: May 2008                               S. Patel
                                                Z. Zeltsan
                                                Alcatel-Lucent
                                                November 2007

     Password-Authenticated Diffie-Hellman Exchange (PAK)
                   draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that
   any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she
   is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he
   or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
   Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as
   Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 7, 2008.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2007).

Abstract
   This document proposes to add mutual authentication, based on
   human-memorizable password, to the basic unauthenticated Diffie-Hellman
   key exchange. The proposed algorithm is called Password-authenticated
   Key exchange (PAK). PAK allows two parties to authenticate themselves
   while performing the Diffie-Hellman exchange.
   The protocol is secure against all passive and active attacks.
   In particular, it does not allow either type of attackers to obtain any
   information that would enable an off-line dictionary attack on the
   password. The use of Diffie-Hellman exchange ensures Forward Secrecy.

Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 1]


Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
   2.  Password Authendicated Key exchange
   3.  Diffie-Hellman parameters
   4.  IANA considerations
   5.  Security Considerations
   6.  Acknowledgments
   7.  References
   Authors' and Contributors' Addresses




1.  Introduction

    PAK has the following advantages:

    -  it provides a secure authenticated key exchange protocol.

    -  it is secure against offline dictionary attacks when passwords are used.

    -  it ensures Forward Secrecy.

    -  it is proved to be as secure as the Diffie-Hellman solution.

    The PAK protocol [BMP00, MP05, X.1035] has been proven to be as secure
    as the Diffie-Hellman [DH76] in the random oracle model [BR93]. That is,
    PAK retains its security when used with low-entropy passwords. Therefore,
    it can be seamlessly integrated into existing applications, requiring
    secure authentication based on such low-entropy shared secrets.


2.  Password Authenticated Key exchange
    We briefly describe PAK in this section. Details of the protocol are
    omitted for simplicity.

    Diffie-Hellman key agreement requires that both the sender and
    recipient of a message create their own secret random numbers and
    exchange the exponentiation of their respective numbers.

    PAK has two parties, Alice and Bob, sharing a secret password PW. The
    global Diffie-Hellman publicly known constants:

    a prime p and a generator g are carefully selected so that:

    Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 2]


    Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007

    1.  A safe prime p is large enough to make the computation of discrete
        logarithm infeasible and
    2.  Powers of g modulo p cover the entire range of p-1 integers from 1 to
        p-1. (References demonstrate working example of selections).

    Conventions in this I-D:
    - a mod b denotes the least non-negative remainder when a is divided by b;
    - Hi(u) denotes an agreed-on hash function (e.g., based on SHA-1, SHA-256,
      etc.) computed over a string u; The various H() act as independent random
      functions.
    - s|t denotes concatenation of the strings s and t;
    - ^ denotes exponentiation.
    - multiplication, division, and exponentiation is performed over (Zp)*;
      in other words:

      1) a*b always means a*b (mod p)

      2) a/b always means a * x (mod p), where x is the multiplicative inverse
         of b module p

      3) a^b means a^b (mod p).


      Initially, Alice selects a secret random exponent Ra and computes g^Ra;
      Bob selects a secret random exponent Rb and computes g^Rb.
      For efficiency purposes, short exponents could be used for Ra and Rb
      provided they have a certain minimum size.  Then:

      A --> B:  X = H1(A|B|PW)*g^Ra

              Bob
              verifies that X <> 0;
              divides X by H1(A|B|PW) to get g^Ra?, the recovered value of g^Ra.



      B --> A:  Y = H2(A|B|PW)*g^Rb
         S1 = H3(A|B|PW|g^Ra?|g^Rb|(g^Ra?)^Rb)

            Alice
              verifies that Y <> 0;
              divides Y by H2(A|B|PW) to get g^Rb?, the recovered value of g^Rb.
              authenticates Bob by checking if computed S1 equals received S1;
              Computed S1 = H3(A|B|PW|g^Ra|g^Rb?|(g^Rb?)^Ra).
              If authenticated then sets key K = H5(A|B|PW|g^Ra|g^Rb?|(g^Rb?)^Ra)




      Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 3]


      Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007

      A --> B:  S2 = H4(A|B|PW|g^Ra|g^Rb?|(g^Rb?)^Ra)

             Bob
               authenticates Alice by checking if computed S2 equals received S2;
               Computed S2 = H3(A|B|PW|g^Ra?|g^Rb|(g^Ra?)^Rb).
               If authenticated then sets K = H5(A|B|PW|g^Ra?|g^Rb|(g^Ra?)^Rb)


    If any of the above verifications fails, the protocol halts; otherwise,
    both parties have authenticated each other and established the key.



3.  Diffie-Hellman parameters:

    [OTASP] and [WLAN] pre-sets public parameters p and g to their "published"
    values. This is necessary to protect against an attacker sending bogus p
    and g values tricking the legitimate user to engage in improper
    Diffie-Hellman exponentiation and leaking some information about the
    password.


    According to [WLAN] g shall be set to 00001101, and p to the following 1024-bit
    prime number (Most Significant Bit first):

    0xFFFFFFFF     0xFFFFFFFF      0xC90FDAA2      0x2168C234      0xC4C6628B
    0x80DC1CD1     0x29024E08      0x8A67CC74      0x020BBEA6      0x3B139B22
    0x514A0879     0x8E3404DD      0xEF9519B3      0xCD3A431B      0x302B0A6D
    0xF25F1437     0x4FE1356D      0x6D51C245      0xE485B576      0x625E7EC6
    0xF44C42E9     0xA637ED6B      0x0BFF5CB6      0xF406B7ED      0xEE386BFB
    0x5A899FA5     0xAE9F2411      0x7C4B1FE6      0x49286651      0xECE65381
    0xFFFFFFFF     0xFFFFFFFF

    In addition, if short exponents [MP05] are used for Diffie-Hellman
    parameters x and y, then they should have a minimum size of 384 bits as also
    required in [WLAN]. The independent random functions H1 and H2
    should each output 1152 bits assuming prime p is 1024 bits long and session
    keys K are 128 bits long. H3, H4, and H5 each output 128 bits.
    More information on instantiating random functions using hash functions can be
    found in [BR93]. We use the FIPS 180 SHA-1 hashing function below to instantiate
    the random function as done in [WLAN], however, SHA-256 could also be used:

    H1(z): SHA-1(1|1|z) mod 2^128 | SHA-1(1|2|z) mod 2^128 |. . .| SHA-1(1|9|z)  mod 2^128

    H2(z): SHA-1(2|1|z) mod 2^128 | SHA-1(2|2|z) mod 2^128 |. . .| SHA-1(2|9|z) mod 2^128


Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 4]


Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007

    H3(z): SHA-1(3|len(z)|z|z) mod 2^128
    H4(z): SHA-1(4|len(z)|z|z) mod 2^128

    H5(z): SHA-1(5|len(z)|z|z) mod 2^128

    In order to create 1152 output bits for H1 and H2, nine calls to SHA-1 are made
    and 128 lsbs of each output are used. The input payload of each call to SHA-1
    consists of:


    a) 32 bits of function type which for H1 is set to 1 and for H2 is set to 2;
    b) a counter value which is incremented from 1 to 9 for each call of SHA-1;
    c) and, finally, the argument z to the function which in our application is
       (A|B|PW).

    The functions H3, H4, and H5 require only one call to the SHA-1 hashing function
    and its payload consists of:
    a) 32 bits of function type (e.g. 3 for H3);
    b) a 32 bit value for the length of the argument z;
    c) the actual argument repeated twice.

    Finally, the 128 least significant bits of the output are used.


4.  IANA considerations
    No IANA considerations at this time

5.  Security Considerations

    PAK involves the use of shared secret. Protection of the shared values and managing
    (limiting) their exposure over time is of outmost importance.

    Only previously agreed upon values for parameters p and g should be used in the
    PAK protocol. This is necessary to protect against an attacker sending bogus p and
    g values and thus, tricking the other communicating party in an improper
    Diffie-Hellman exponentiation. The use of the parameters p and g that do not meet
    the requirements described in this Recommendation may result in a compromise of
    the password PW (shared secret). A proper 1024-bit value for p and an appropriate
    value for g are published in the TIA Standard TIA-683-D.

    In addition, if short exponents are used for Diffie-Hellman parameters Ra and Rb
    then they should have a minimum size of 384 bits (assuming 128 bit session keys
    are used) as also required in TIA Standard TIA-683-D.

    The independent random functions H1 and H2 should have output 1152 bits each, assuming
    prime p is 1024 bits long and session keys K are 128 bits long. The random functions H3,
    H4, and H5 should have output 128 bits.


Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 5]


Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007

6.  Acknowledgments
    The authors are grateful for the thoughtful comments received from Shehryar Qutub
    and Yaron Sheffer.

7.  References and bibliography

    [BMP00]     V. Boyko, P. MacKenzie, S. Patel, Provably secure password
                authentication and key exchange using Diffie-Hellman,
                Proc. of Eurocrypt 2000.

    [BR93]      M. Bellare and P. Rogaway, Random Oracles are Practical:
                A Paradigm for Designing Efficient Protocols, Proc. Of the
                fifth annual conference on computer and communications
                security, 1993.

    [DH76]      W. Diffie and M.E. Hellman, New directions in cryptography,
                IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 22 (1976), 644-654.

    [MP05]      P. MacKenzie, S. Patel, Hard Bits of the Discrete Log with
                Applications to Password Authentication, CT-RSA 2005.

    [RFC2631]   IETF RFC 2631, E. Rescorla, Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                Method, Standards track,1999

    [SHA1]      National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
                "Announcing the Secure Hash Standard", FIPS 180-1, U.S.
                Department of Commerce, April 1995.

    [OTASP]     Over-the-Air Service Provisioning of Mobile Stations in Spread
                Spectrum Systems, 3GPP2 C.S0016-C v. 1.0 5, 3GPP2, 10/2004.

    [WLAN]      Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) Interworking, 3GPP2 X.S0028-0,
                v.1.0, 3GPP2, 4/2005

    [X.805]     ITU-T Recommendation X.805 (2003), Security Architecture for
                Systems Providing End to end Communications.

    [X.1035]    ITU-T Recommendation X.1035, Password-authenticated key exchange
                (PAK) protocol

    [FIPS180]   NIST Federal Information Processing Standards,
                Publication FIPS 180-1

    [IEEE1363]  IEEE P1363.2, April 24, 2002, The PAK suite: Protocols for
                Password-Authentication Key Exchange, P. MacKenzie

Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 6]


Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007

Authors' and Contributors' Addresses

    Alec Brusilovsky
    Alcatel-Lucent
    Tel: +1 630 979 5490
    Email: abrusilovsky@alcatel-lucent.com

    Igor Faynberg
    Alcatel-Lucent
    Tel: +1 908 582 2626
    Email: faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com

    Sarvar Patel
    Alcatel-Lucent
    Tel: +1 973 386 6558
    Email: sarvar@alcatel-lucent.com


    Zachary Zeltsan
    Alcatel-Lucent
    Tel: +1 908 582 2359
    Email: zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com

Intellectual Property Statement

    The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
    Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
    pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
    this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
    might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
    made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
    on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
    found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

    Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
    assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
    attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
    such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
    specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
    http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

    The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
    copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
    rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
    this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
    ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 7]


Internet Draft           draft-brusilovsky-pak-06.txt            November 2007


Copyright Statement

    Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

    This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
    contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
    retain all their rights.

    This document and the information contained herein are provided
    on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
    REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE
    IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL
    WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
    WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE
    ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
    FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
































Brusilovsky                                                       [Page 8]