| Internet-Draft | RDAP Status Set Extension | September 2026 |
| Gould, et al. | Expires 6 March 2027 | [Page] |
- Workgroup:
- Network Working Group
- Internet-Draft:
- draft-gould-regext-rdap-status-set-03
- Published:
- Intended Status:
- Standards Track
- Expires:
Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Extension for Status Set
Abstract
This document describes an Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) extension for including status sets assigned to RDAP object classes, such as the Domain Object Class and the Nameserver Object Class in [RFC9083]. There can be many overlapping reasons for each of the "status" member values, such as implementing a lock service, complying with a court order, or addressing domain abuse. A status set defines an object representing the reason for setting a "status" value, so clients and servers can effectively manage the overlapping reasons of individual "status" values using the status sets. This RDAP extension supports returning the assigned client and server status sets with additional data members, such as the mapped "status" values and when the status set was assigned.¶
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 6 March 2027.¶
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
1. Introduction
This document describes an Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) extension for including status sets assigned to RDAP object classes, such as the Domain Object Class and the Nameserver Object Class in [RFC9083]. There can be many overlapping reasons for each of the "status" member values, such as implementing a lock service, complying with a court order, or addressing domain abuse. A status set defines an object representing the reason for setting a "status" value, can effectively manage the overlapping reasons of individual "status" values using the status sets. This RDAP extension supports returning the assigned client and server status sets with additional data members, such as the "type", the mapped "status" values, whether the status set is inherited either from the parent object (domain) or to child objects (nameservers), and whether the status set is directly assigned.¶
This document is complementary to the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Status Set Extension [I-D.gould-regext-epp-status-set], but registry operators do not need to implement that extension in their EPP server in order to implement this RDAP extension.¶
2. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The example RDAP responses don't include all of the RDAP response members, but are only representative of the members that are relavant to this extension.¶
3. RDAP Conformance
Servers implementing this extension MUST include the string "statusSet" in the "rdapConformance" ([RFC9083]) array of all relevant RDAP responses. The registration of the "statusSet" extension identifier is described in Section 6.¶
4. "statusSet_data" Member
The status set information is conveyed via a new top-level object member named "statusSet_data" within the object class that the status sets are assigned to. A status set is an object that defines the reason for the "status" member values for an RDAP object class, such as the Domain Object Class and the Nameserver Object Class in [RFC9083]. The status set can also be used as a marker status set when there are no mapped "status" member values that can drive additional business logic and publishing use cases. An object can have many assigned status sets, and the status sets can include an overlapping set of "status" member values. The "status" member value will be assigned to the object if there is at least one set set assigned to the object with the mapped "status" member value. The "status" member value will be unassigned from the object when all status sets are unassigned with the mapped "status" member value. For example, both the "Registrar Lock" status set and the "Auth Token Lock" status set are mapped to the "client update prohibited" "status" member value, where if either of the status sets are assigned to the object, the "client update prohibited" "status" member value will be assigned. The "client update prohibited" "status" member value will be unassigned if both "Registrar Lock" status set and "Auth Token Lock" status sets are unassigned. The "statusSet_data" member includes a list of status set objects containing the following members:¶
- name -- the unique name for the status set that is up to server policy. Example names include "Registrar Lock", "Auth Token Lock", and "Registry Lock". There is a reserved value of "REDACTED" that is used for a server status set, where the name must be redacted based on server policy.¶
- type -- indicates whether the status set is a client status set with a value of "client" or the status set is a server status set with a value of "server". Only servers can set and unset a server status set.¶
- inherited -- OPTIONAL boolean with a default value of false that indicates inheritable downward to child objects (Nameservers) when applied to Domain Objects, and inherited upward from parent object (Domain) when applied to NameServer object.¶
- assigned -- OPTIONAL boolean with a default value of true that indicates whether the status set is directly assigned to the object. The value can be false for an inherited status set.¶
- created -- OPTIONAL date and time that the status set was assigned to the object.¶
- status -- An OPTIONAL array of "status" values in [RFC9083] that are mapped to the status set.¶
- attributes - An OPTIONAL array of status set attribute objects, each with a "name" and "value" member.¶
{
"objectClassName": "domain",
"handle": "XXX",
"ldhName": "example.com",
"status": [
"client update prohibited",
"client delete prohibited",
"client transfer prohibited"
],
"rdapConformance": ["rdap_level_0", "statusSet"],
"statusSet_data": [
{
"name": "Auth Token Lock",
"type": "client",
"inherited": true,
"assigned": true,
"created": "2026-05-03T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": [
"client update prohibited",
"client delete prohibited",
"client transfer prohibited"
]
}
]
}
{
"objectClassName": "domain",
"handle": "XXX",
"ldhName" : "example.com",
"status" : [
"client update prohibited",
"client delete prohibited",
"client transfer prohibited",
"server update prohibited",
"server delete prohibited",
"server transfer prohibited"
],
"rdapConformance": ["rdap_level_0", "statusSet"],
"statusSet_data": [
{
"name": "Auth Token Lock",
"type": "client",
"inherited": true,
"assigned": true,
"created": "2026-05-03T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": [
"client update prohibited",
"client delete prohibited",
"client transfer prohibited"
]
},
{
"name": "Registrar Lock",
"type": "client",
"inherited": false,
"assigned": true,
"created": "2026-05-03T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": [
"client update prohibited",
"client delete prohibited",
"client transfer prohibited"
]
},
{
"name": "Registry Lock",
"type": "server",
"inherited": false,
"assigned": true,
"created": "2026-05-03T09:10:00.0Z",
"status": [
"server update prohibited",
"server delete prohibited",
"server transfer prohibited"
]
},
{
"name": "For Sale",
"type": "client",
"inherited": false,
"assigned": true,
"created": "2026-05-01T10:10:00.0Z",
"attributes": [
{"name": "Currency", "value": "USD"},
{"name": "Price", "value": "100.00"}
]
}
]
}
{
"objectClassName": "nameserver",
"handle": "XXXX",
"ldhName" : "ns1.xn--fo-5ja.example",
"status" : [ "active" ],
"rdapConformance": ["rdap_level_0", "statusSet"],
"statusSet_data": [
{
"name": "Auth Token Lock",
"type": "client",
"inherited": true,
"assigned": false,
"created": "2026-05-03T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": [
"client update prohibited",
"client delete prohibited",
"client transfer prohibited"
]
}
]
}
5. Extension Version Identifier
Note to RFC Editor: Please replace "statusSet-0.2" with "statusSet-1.0" before publication.¶
This extension uses the Point Versioning defined in [I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-versioning] with a Point Extension Version Identifier of "statusSet-0.2". Clients and servers implementing this extension MUST also support and implement [I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-versioning]. When there are interface changes to the extension, the Point Extension Version Identifier will be incremented, which may not match the draft version number. The initial Standards Track version of this extension will use the Point Extension Version Identifier "statusSet-1.0".¶
6. IANA Considerations
6.1. RDAP Extensions Registry
IANA is requested to register the following value in the RDAP Extensions Registry:¶
7. Security Considerations
Status set data may include legal and policy implications. Servers MUST ensure that disclosure of this information complies with applicable data protection laws and policies.¶
8. References
8.1. Normative References
- [I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-versioning]
- Gould, J., Keathley, D., and M. Loffredo, "Versioning in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning-07, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning-07>.
- [RFC2119]
- Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
- [RFC8174]
- Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
- [RFC9083]
- Hollenbeck, S. and A. Newton, "JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", STD 95, RFC 9083, DOI 10.17487/RFC9083, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083>.
8.2. Informative References
- [I-D.gould-regext-epp-status-set]
- Gould, J., Garg, 8. 7. 7. 7. 6. 7. 3. 7. 6. 8., and M. S. M. Khader, "Status Set Extension Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-gould-regext-epp-status-set-03, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gould-regext-epp-status-set-03>.
Appendix A. Change History
A.1. Change from 00 to 01
- Added informative reference to draft-gould-regext-epp-status-set.¶
A.2. Change from 01 to 02
- Revised the language of the Extension Version Identifier section to match other Point Versioning RDAP extensions.¶