NETCONF B. Lengyel
Internet-Draft Ericsson
Intended status: Standards Track M. Bjorklund
Expires: April 23, 2010 Tail-f Systems
October 20, 2009
Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF
draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-11
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. This document may contain material
from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly
available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the
copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF
Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the
IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from
the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this
document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and
derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards
Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to
translate it into languages other than English.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 23, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Abstract
The NETCONF protocol defines the lock and unlock RPCs, used to lock
entire configuration datastores. In some situations, a way to lock
only parts of a configuration datastore is required. This document
defines a capability-based extension to the NETCONF protocol for
locking portions of a configuration datastore.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.1. Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Partial Locking Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1.1. Usage Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3. Capability Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4. New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4.1. <partial-lock> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4.2. <partial-unlock> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.5. Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.6. Interactions with Other Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.6.1. Candidate Configuration Capability . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.6.2. Confirmed Commit Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.6.3. Distinct Startup Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5. Appendix A - XML Schema for Partial Locking (normative) . . 15
6. Appendix B - YANG Module for Partial Locking
(non-normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7. Appendix C - Usage Example - Reserving nodes for future
editing (non-normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8. Appendix D - Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.1. 10-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.2. 09-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.3. 08-09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.4. 07-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.5. 06-07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.6. 05-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.7. 04-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.8. 03-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8.9. 02-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8.10. 01-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8.11. 00-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8.12. -00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
1. Introduction
The [NETCONF] protocol describes the lock and unlock operations that
operate on entire configuration datastores. Often, multiple
management sessions need to be able to modify the configuration of a
managed device in parallel. In these cases, locking only parts of a
configuration datastore is needed. This document defines a
capability based extension to the NETCONF protocol to support partial
locking of the NETCONF running datastore using a mechanism based on
the existing XPath filtering mechanisms.
1.1. Definition of Terms
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14, [RFC2119].
Additionally the following terms are defined:
o Instance Identifier: an XPath expression identifying a specific
node in the conceptual XML datastore. It contains an absolute
path expression in abbreviated syntax, where predicates are used
only to specify values for nodes defined as keys to distinguish
multiple instances.
o Scope of the lock: initially the set of nodes returned by the
XPath expressions in a successful partial-lock operation. The set
might be modified if some of the nodes are deleted by the session
owning the lock.
o Protected area: the set of nodes that are protected from
modification by the lock. This set consists of nodes in the scope
of the lock and nodes in subtrees under them.
2. Partial Locking Capability
2.1. Overview
The :partial-lock capability indicates that the device supports the
locking of its configuration with a more limited scope than a
complete configuration datastore. The scope to be locked is
specified by using restricted or full XPath expressions. Partial
locking only affects configuration data and only the running
datastore. The candidate or the start-up datastore are not affected.
The system MUST ensure that configuration resources covered by the
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
lock are not modified by other NETCONF or non-NETCONF management
operations such as SNMP and the CLI.
The duration of the partial lock begins when the partial lock is
granted and lasts until (1) either the corresponding <partial-unlock>
operation succeeds or (2) the NETCONF session terminates.
A NETCONF session MAY have multiple parts of the running datastore
locked using partial lock operations.
The <partial-lock> operation returns a lock-id to identify each
successfully acquired lock. The lock-id is unique at any given time
for a NETCONF server for all partial-locks granted to any NETCONF or
non-NETCONF sessions.
2.1.1. Usage Scenarios
In the following we describe a few scenarios for partial locking.
Besides the two described here, there are many other usage scenarios
possible.
2.1.1.1. Multiple managers handling the writable running datastore with
overlapping sections
Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF agent simultaneously.
The agent is handled via the writable running datastore. Each
manager has his or her own task, which might involve the modification
of overlapping sections of the datastore.
After collecting and analyzing input and preparing the NETCONF
operations off-line, the manager locks the areas that are important
for his task using one single <partial-lock> operation. The manager
executes a number of <edit-config> operations to modify the
configuration, then releases the partial-lock. The lock should be
held for the shortest possible time (e.g. seconds rather then
minutes). The manager should collect all human input before locking
anything. As each manager locks only a part of the data model,
usually multiple operators can execute the <edit-config> operations
simultaneously.
2.1.1.2. Multiple managers handling the writable running datastore,
distinct management areas
Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF agent simultaneously.
The agent is handled via the writable running datastore. The agent's
data model contains a number of well defined separate areas that can
be configured without impacting other areas. An example can be a
server with multiple applications running on it, or a number of a
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
network elements with a common NETCONF agent for management.
Each manager has his or her own task, which does not involve the
modification of overlapping sections of the datastore.
The manager locks his area with a <partial-lock> operation, uses a
number of <edit-config> commands to modify it, later releases the
lock. As each manager has his functional area assigned to him, and
he locks only that area, multiple managers can edit the configuration
simultaneously. Locks can be held for extended periods (e.g.
minutes, hours), as this will not hinder other managers.
This scenario assumes that the global lock operation from [NETCONF]
is not used.
2.2. Dependencies
The device MUST support restricted XPath expressions in the select
element, as described in Section 2.4.1. Optionally, if the :xpath
capability is also supported (as defined in [NETCONF] chapter 8.9.
XPath Capability), the device MUST also support using any XPath 1.0
expression in the select element.
2.3. Capability Identifier
urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:partial-lock:1.0
2.4. New Operations
2.4.1. <partial-lock>
The <partial-lock> operation allows the client to lock a portion of
the running datastore. The portion to lock is specified with XPath
expressions in the "select" elements in the <partial-lock> operation.
Each XPath expression MUST return a node set.
When a NETCONF session holds a lock on a node, no other session or
non-NETCONF mechanism of the system can change that node or any node
in the hierarchy of nodes beneath it.
Locking a node protects the node itself and the complete subtree
under the node from modification by others. The set of locked nodes
is called the scope of the lock, while all the locked nodes and the
nodes in the subtrees under them make up the protected area.
The XPath expressions are evaluated only once at lock time.
Thereafter, the scope of the lock is maintained as a set of nodes,
i.e. the returned nodeset, and not by the XPath expression. If the
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
configuration data is later altered in a way that would make the
original XPath expressions evaluate to a different set of nodes, this
does not affect the scope of the partial lock.
Let's say the agent's data model includes a list of interface nodes.
If the XPath expression in the partial lock operation covers all
interface nodes at locking, the scope of the lock will be maintained
as the list of interface nodes at the time when the lock was granted.
If someone later creates a new interface, this new interface will not
be included in the locked-nodes list created previously so the new
interface will not be locked.
A <partial-lock> operation MUST be handled atomically by the NETCONF
server. The server either locks all requested parts of the datastore
or none. If during the <partial-lock> operation one of the requested
parts cannot be locked, the server MUST unlock all parts that have
already been locked during that operation.
If a node in the scope of the lock is deleted by the session owning
the lock, it is removed from the scope of the lock, so any other
session or non-NETCONF mechanism can recreate it. If all nodes in
the scope of the lock are deleted, the lock will still be present.
However, its scope will become empty (since the lock will not cover
any nodes).
A NETCONF server that supports partial locking MUST be able to grant
multiple simultaneous partial locks to a single NETCONF session. If
the protected area of the individual locks overlap, nodes in the
common area MUST be protected until all of the overlapping locks are
released.
A partial lock operation MUST fail if:
o Any NETCONF session (including the current session) owns the
global lock on the running datastore.
o Any part of the area to be protected is already locked (or
protected by partial locking) by another management session,
including other NETCONF sessions using <partial-lock> or any other
non-NETCONF management method.
o The requesting user is not successfully authenticated.
o The NETCONF server implements access control, and the locking user
does not have sufficient access rights. The exact handling of
access rights is outside the scope of this document, but it is
assumed that there is an access control system that MAY deny or
allow the partial lock operation.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
The <partial-lock> operation is designed for simplicity, so when a
partial lock is executed you get what you asked for: a set of nodes
that are locked for writing. As a consequence users must observe the
following:
o Locking does not affect read operations.
o If part of the running datastore is locked, this has no effect on
any unlocked parts of the datastore. If this is a problem (e.g.,
changes depend on data values or nodes outside the protected part
of the datastore), these nodes SHOULD be included in the protected
area of the lock.
o Configuration data can be edited both inside and outside the
protected area of a lock. It is the responsibility of the NETCONF
client application to lock all relevant parts of the datastore
that are crucial for a specific management action.
Note: The <partial-lock> operation does not modify the global <lock>
operation defined in the base NETCONF Protocol [NETCONF]. If part of
the running datastore is already locked by <partial-lock>, then a
global lock for the running datastore MUST fail even if the global
lock is requested by the NETCONF session that owns the partial lock.
2.4.1.1. Parameters, Result, Examples
Parameters:
select: One or more 'select' elements, each containing an XPath
expression. The XPath expression is evaluated in a context where
the context node is the root of the server's conceptual data
model, and the set of namespace declarations are those in scope
on the select element.
The nodes returned from the select expressions are reported in
the rpc-reply message.
Each select expression MUST return a node set, and at least one
of the node sets MUST be non-empty.
If the device supports the :xpath capability, any valid XPath 1.0
expression can be used. If the device does not support the
:xpath capability, the XPath expression MUST be limited to an
Instance Identifier expression. An Instance Identifier is an
absolute path expression in abbreviated syntax, where predicates
are used only to specify values for nodes defined as keys to
distinguish multiple instances.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Example: Lock virtual router 1 and interface eth1
<nc:rpc
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
message-id="135">
<partial-lock>
<select xmlns:rte="http://example.com/ns/route">
/rte:routing/rte:virtualRouter[rte:routerName='router1']
</select>
<select xmlns:if="http://example.com/ns/interface">
/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:id='eth1']
</select>
</partial-lock>
</nc:rpc>
<nc:rpc-reply
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
message-id="135">
<lock-id>127</lock-id>
<locked-node xmlns:rte="http://example.com/ns/route">
/rte:routing/rte:virtualRouter[rte:routerName='router1']
</locked-node>
<locked-node xmlns:if="http://example.com/ns/interface">
/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:id='eth1']
</locked-node>
</nc:rpc-reply>
Note: The XML Schema in [NETCONF] has a known bug which requires the
<data> XML element in a <rpc-reply>. This means that the above
examples will not validate using the XML Schema found in [NETCONF].
Positive Response:
If the device was able to satisfy the request, an <rpc-reply> is sent
with a <lock-id> element (lock identifier) in the <rpc-reply>
element. A list of locked nodes is also returned in Instance
Identifier format.
Negative Response:
If any select expression is an invalid XPath expression, the <error-
tag> is 'invalid-value'.
If any select expression returns something other than a node set, the
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
<error-tag> is 'invalid-value', and the <error-app-tag> is 'not-a-
node-set'.
If all the select expressions return an empty node set, the <error-
tag> is 'operation-failed', and the <error-app-tag> is 'no-matches'.
If the :xpath capability is not supported and the XPath expression is
not an Instance Identifier, the <error-tag> is 'invalid-value', the
<error-app-tag> is 'invalid-lock-specification'.
If access control denies the partial lock, the <error-tag> is
'access-denied'. Access control SHOULD be checked before checking
for conflicting locks to avoid giving out information about other
sessions to an unauthorized client.
If a lock is already held by another session on any node within the
subtrees to be locked, the <error-tag> element is 'lock-denied' and
the <error-info> element includes the <session-id> of the lock owner.
If the lock is held by a non-NETCONF session, a <session-id> of 0
(zero) SHOULD be included. The same error response is returned if
the requesting session already holds the (global) lock for the
running datastore.
If needed the returned session-id may be used to <kill-session> the
NETCONF session holding the lock.
2.4.1.2. Deadlock Avoidance
As with most locking systems, it is possible that two management
sessions trying to lock different parts of the configuration could
become dead-locked. To avoid this situation, clients SHOULD lock
everything they need in one operation. If locking fails, the client
MUST back-off, release any previously acquired locks, and SHOULD
retry the procedure after waiting some randomized time interval.
2.4.2. <partial-unlock>
The operation unlocks the parts of the running datastore that were
previously locked using <partial-lock> during the same session. The
operation unlocks the parts that are covered by the lock identified
by the lock-id parameter. In case of multiple potentially
overlapping locks, only the lock identified by the lock-id is
removed.
Parameters:
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
lock-id: Identity of the lock to be unlocked. This lock-id MUST
have been received as a response to a lock request by the manager
during the current session, and MUST NOT have been sent in a
previous unlock request.
Example: Unlock a previously created lock
<nc:rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
message-id="136">
<partial-unlock>
<lock-id>127</lock-id>
</partial-unlock>
</nc:rpc>
Positive Response:
If the device was able to satisfy the request, an <rpc-reply> is sent
that contains an <ok> element. A positive response MUST be sent even
if all of the locked parts of the datastore have already been
deleted.
Negative Response:
If the <lock-id> parameter does not identify a lock which is owned by
the session, an 'invalid-value' error is returned.
2.5. Modifications to Existing Operations
A successful partial lock will cause a subsequent operation to fail
if that operation attempts to modify nodes in the protected area of
the lock and is executed in a NETCONF session other than the session
that has been granted the lock. The <error-tag> 'in-use' and the
<error-app-tag> 'locked' is returned. All operations that modify the
running datastore are affected, including: <edit-config>, <copy-
config>, <delete-config>, <commit> and <discard-changes>. If partial
lock prevents <edit-config> modifying some data, but the operation
includes the continue-on-error option, modification of other parts of
the datastore, which are not protected by partial locking, might
still succeed.
If the datastore contains nodes locked by partial lock, this will
cause the (global) <lock> operation to fail. The <error-tag> element
'lock-denied' and an <error-info> element including the <session-id>
of the lock owner will be returned. If the lock is held by a non-
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
NETCONF session, a <session-id> of 0 (zero) is returned.
All of these operations are affected only if they are targeting the
running datastore.
2.6. Interactions with Other Capabilities
2.6.1. Candidate Configuration Capability
The candidate datastore can not be locked using the <partial-lock>
operation.
2.6.2. Confirmed Commit Capability
If:
o a partial lock is requested for the running datastore, and
o the NETCONF server implements the :confirmed-commit capability,
and
o there was a recent confirmed <commit> operation where the
confirming <commit> operation has not been received
then the lock MUST be denied, because if the confirmation does not
arrive, the running datastore MUST be rolled back to its state before
the commit. The NETCONF server might therefore need to modify the
configuration.
In this case the <error-tag> 'in-use' and the <error-app-tag>
'outstanding-confirmed-commit' is returned.
2.6.3. Distinct Startup Capability
The startup datastore can not be locked using the <partial-lock>
operation.
3. Security Considerations
The same considerations are relevant as for the base NETCONF Protocol
[NETCONF]. <partial-lock> and <partial-unlock> RPCs MUST only be
allowed for an authenticated user. <partial-lock> and <partial-
unlock> RPCs SHOULD only be allowed for an authorized user. However
as NETCONF access control is not standardized and not a mandatory
part of a NETCONF implementation, it is strongly recommended, but
OPTIONAL. (although nearly all implementations include some kind of
access control)
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
A lock (either a partial lock or a global lock) might prevent other
users from configuring the system. The following mechanisms are in
place to prevent the misuse of this possibility:
A user, that is not successfully authenticated, MUST NOT be
granted a partial lock.
Only an authorized user SHOULD be able to request a partial lock.
The partial lock is automatically released when a session is
terminated regardless of how the session ends.
The <kill-session> operation makes it possible to terminate other
users's sessions.
The NETCONF server MAY log partial lock requests in an audit
trail.
A lock that is hung for some reason (e.g., a broken TCP connection
that the server has not yet recognised) can be released using another
NETCONF session by explicitly killing the session owning that lock
using the <kill-session> operation.
Partial locking is not an authorization mechanism; it SHOULD NOT be
used to provide security or access control. Partial locking SHOULD
only be used as a mechanism for providing consistency when multiple
managers are trying to configure the node. It is vital that users
easily understand the exact scope of a lock. This is why the scope
is determined when granting a lock and is not modified thereafter.
4. IANA Considerations
This document registers one capability identifier URN from the
"Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Capability URNs" registry,
and one URI for the NETCONF XML namespace in the "IETF XML registry"
[RFC3688]. Note that the capability URN is compliant to [NETCONF]
section 10.3.
+---------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| Index | Capability Identifier |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| :partial-lock | urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:partial-lock:1 |
| | .0 |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------------+
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
5. Appendix A - XML Schema for Partial Locking (normative)
The following XML Schema defines the <partial-lock> and <partial-
unlock> operations:
-- RFC Ed.: Insert license information for code as appropriate
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Schema defining the partial-lock and unlock operations.
organization "IETF NETCONF Working Group"
contact
Netconf Working Group
Mailing list: netconf@ietf.org
Web: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/netconf-charter.html
Balazs Lengyel
balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com"
revision 2009-10-19
description Initial version, published as RFC yyyy.
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number and remove this note.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"/>
<xs:simpleType name="lock-id-type">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
A number identifying a specific
partial-lock granted to a session.
It is allocated by the system, and SHOULD
be used in the unlock operation.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedInt"/>
</xs:simpleType>
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
<xs:complexType name="partialLockType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
A NETCONF operation that locks parts of
the running datastore.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="nc:rpcOperationType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="select" type="xs:string"
maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
XPath expression that specifies the scope
of the lock. An Instance Identifier
expression must be used unless the :xpath
capability is supported in which case any
XPath 1.0 expression is allowed.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="partialUnLockType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
A NETCONF operation that releases a previously acquired
partial-lock.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="nc:rpcOperationType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="lock-id" type="lock-id-type">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Identifies the lock to be released. MUST
be the value received in the response to
the partial-lock operation.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<!-- <partial-lock> operation -->
<xs:element name="partial-lock" type="partialLockType"
substitutionGroup="nc:rpcOperation"/>
<!-- <partial-unlock> operation -->
<xs:element name="partial-unlock" type="partialUnLockType"
substitutionGroup="nc:rpcOperation"/>
<!-- reply to <partial-lock> -->
<xs:complexType name="contentPartInPartialLockReplyType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
The content of the reply to a successful
partial-lock request MUST conform to this complex type.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="lock-id" type="lock-id-type">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Identifies the lock to be released. Must be the value
received in the response to a partial-lock operation.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="locked-node" type="xs:string"
maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
List of locked nodes in the running datastore.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
<CODE ENDS>
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
6. Appendix B - YANG Module for Partial Locking (non-normative)
The following YANG module defines the <partial-lock> and <partial-
unlock> operations. The YANG language is defined in
[I-D.ietf-netmod-yang].
-- RFC Ed.: Insert license information for code as appropriate
<CODE BEGINS>
module ietf-netconf-partial-lock {
namespace urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0;
prefix pl;
organization "IETF Network Configuration (netconf) Working Group";
contact
"Netconf Working Group
Mailing list: netconf@ietf.org
Web: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/netconf-charter.html
Balazs Lengyel
Ericsson
balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com";
description
"This YANG module defines the <partial-lock> and
<partial-unlock> operations.";
revision 2009-10-19 {
description
"Initial version, published as RFC yyyy.";
// RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note.
}
typedef lock-id-type {
type uint32;
description
"A number identifying a specific partial-lock granted to a session.
It is allocated by the system, and SHOULD be used in the
partial-unlock operation.";
}
rpc partial-lock {
description
"A NETCONF operation that locks parts of the running datastore.";
input {
leaf-list select {
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
type string;
min-elements 1;
description
"XPath expression that specifies the scope of the lock.
An Instance Identifier expression MUST be used unless the
:xpath capability is supported, in which case any XPath 1.0
expression is allowed.";
}
}
output {
leaf lock-id {
type lock-id-type;
description
"Identifies the lock, if granted. The lock-id SHOULD be
used in the partial-unlock rpc.";
}
leaf-list locked-node {
type instance-identifier;
min-elements 1;
description
"List of locked nodes in the running datastore";
}
}
}
rpc partial-unlock {
description
"A NETCONF operation that releases a previously acquired
partial-lock.";
input {
leaf lock-id {
type lock-id-type;
description
"Identifies the lock to be released. MUST be the value
received in the response to a partial-lock operation.";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
7. Appendix C - Usage Example - Reserving nodes for future editing
(non-normative)
Partial lock cannot be used to lock non-existent nodes, which would
effectively attempt to reserve them for future use. To guarantee
that a node cannot be created by some other session, the parent node
should be locked, the top level node of the new subtree created, and
then locked with another <partial-lock> operation. After this, the
lock on the parent node should be removed.
In this chapter an example illustrating the above is given.
We want to create <user> Joe under <users>, and start editing it.
Editing might take a number of minutes. We want to immediately lock
Joe so no one will touch it before we are finished with the editing.
We also want to minimize locking other parts of the running datastore
as multiple managers might be adding users near simultaneously.
First we check what users are already defined.
Step 1 - Read existing users
<rpc message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<get-config>
<source>
<running/>
</source>
<filter type="subtree">
<top xmlns="http://example.com/users">
<users/>
</top>
</filter>
</get-config>
</rpc>
The NETCONF server sends the following reply.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Step 2 - Receiving existing data
<rpc-reply message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<data>
<top xmlns="http://example.com/users">
<users>
<user>
<name>fred</name>
<phone>8327</phone>
</user>
</users>
</top>
</data>
</rpc-reply>
We want to add the new user "Joe" and immediately lock him using
partial locking. The way to do this, is to first lock all <user>
nodes by locking the <users> node.
Note that if we would lock all the <user> nodes using the select
expression '/usr:top/usr:users/usr:user' ; this would not lock the
new user "Joe", which we will create after locking. So we rather
have to lock the <users> node.
Step 3 - Lock users
<nc:rpc
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
message-id="102">
<partial-lock>
<select xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
/usr:top/usr:users
</select>
</partial-lock>
</nc:rpc>
The NETCONF server grants the partial lock. The scope of the lock
includes only the <users> node. The lock protects the <users> node
and all <user> nodes below it from modification (by other sessions).
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Step 4 - Receive lock
<nc:rpc-reply
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
message-id="102">
<lock-id>1</lock-id>
<locked-node xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
/usr:top/usr:users
</locked-node>
</nc:rpc-reply>
Next we create user Joe. Joe is protected by the lock received above,
as it is under the sub-tree rooted at the <users> node.
Step 5 - Create user Joe
<rpc message-id="103"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<edit-config>
<target>
<running/>
</target>
<config>
<top xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
<users>
<user>
<name>Joe</name>
</user>
</users>
</top>
</config>
</edit-config>
</rpc>
We receive a positive reply to the <edit-config> (not shown). Next
we request a lock, that locks only <user> Joe, and release the lock
on the <users> node. This will allow other managers to create
additional new users.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Step 6 - Lock user Joe
<nc:rpc
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
message-id="104">
<partial-lock>
<select xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
/usr:top/usr:users/user[usr:name="Joe"]"
</select>
</partial-lock>
</nc:rpc>
The NETCONF server grants the partial lock. The scope of this second
lock includes only the <user> node with name Joe. The lock protects
all data below this particular <user> node.
Step 7 - Receive lock
<nc:rpc-reply
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
message-id="104">
<lock-id>2</lock-id>
<locked-node xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
/usr:top/usr:users/user[usr:name="Joe"]"
</locked-node>
</nc:rpc-reply>
The scope of the second lock is the <user> node Joe. It protects this
<user> node and any data below it (e.g. phone number). At this point
of time these nodes are protected both by the first and second lock.
Next we unlock the other <user>s and the <users> node, to allow other
managers to work on them. We still keep the second lock, so the
<user> node Joe and the sub-tree below is still protected.
Step 8 - Release lock on <users>
<nc:rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
message-id="105">
<partial-unlock>
<lock-id>1</lock-id>
</partial-unlock>
</nc:rpc>
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
8. Appendix D - Change Log
8.1. 10-11
Minor clarifications
8.2. 09-10
Clarifications
Only the running datastore can be locked
8.3. 08-09
Clarifications
8.4. 07-08
Clarifications
8.5. 06-07
Changed XSD and YANG to allow additional proprietary datastores to be
locked.
8.6. 05-06
Added usage example
Clarified error messages
Clarified interaction with edit-config continue-on-error
Improved YANG: indentation, canonical order, contact info
Added usage example in appendix C
Synchronized YANG and XSD
8.7. 04-05
Language and editorial updates
all app-tags are with dashes without spaces
Added usage scenarios
Changed encoding
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Clarified definitions, separated scope of lock and protected area
8.8. 03-04
Minor clarifications
Added list of locked-nodes to the output of partial-lock.
Added <target> wrapper around datastore names.
Allowed atomic/one operation locking of datastore parts in multiple
datastores.
Improved English (hopefully)
Removed the <data> element from rpc-reply following the text of
rfc4741.
8.9. 02-03
Minor clarifications
Same descriptions in XSD and YANG.
8.10. 01-02
Made XSD normative
Clarified that no specific access control is assumed.
Clarified that non-existing nodes are NOT covered by the lock, even
if they where existing and covered by the lock when it was originally
granted.
Some rewording
Added app-tags for two of the error cases.
Made YANG an informative reference
Enhanced security considerations.
8.11. 00-01
Added YANG module.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
8.12. -00
Created from draft-lengyel-ngo-partial-lock-01.txt
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
9. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Andy Bierman, Sharon Chisholm, Phil Shafer , David
Harrington, Mehmet Ersue, Wes Hardaker, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Washam
Fan and many other members of the NETCONF WG for providing important
input to this document.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[NETCONF] Enns, R., "NETCONF Configuration Protocol", RFC 4741,
December 2006.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
January 2004.
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-netmod-yang]
Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A data modeling language for
NETCONF", draft-ietf-netmod-yang-07 (work in progress),
July 2009.
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF October 2009
Authors' Addresses
Balazs Lengyel
Ericsson
Email: balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com
Martin Bjorklund
Tail-f Systems
Email: mbj@tail-f.com
Lengyel & Bjorklund Expires April 23, 2010 [Page 29]