Internet-Draft | qlog | July 2024 |
Marx, et al. | Expires 9 January 2025 | [Page] |
- Workgroup:
- QUIC
- Internet-Draft:
- draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-09
- Published:
- Intended Status:
- Standards Track
- Expires:
qlog: Structured Logging for Network Protocols
Abstract
qlog provides extensible structured logging for network protocols, allowing for easy sharing of data that benefits common debug and analysis methods and tooling. This document describes key concepts of qlog: formats, files, traces, events, and extension points. This definition includes the high-level log file schemas, and generic event schemas. Requirements and guidelines for creating protocol-specific event schemas are also presented. All schemas are defined independent of serialization format, allowing logs to be represented in various ways such as JSON, CSV, or protobuf.¶
Note to Readers
-
Note to RFC editor: Please remove this section before publication.¶
Feedback and discussion are welcome at https://github.com/quicwg/qlog. Readers are advised to refer to the "editor's draft" at that URL for an up-to-date version of this document.¶
Concrete examples of integrations of this schema in various programming languages can be found at https://github.com/quiclog/qlog/.¶
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 9 January 2025.¶
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
1. Introduction
Endpoint logging is a useful strategy for capturing and understanding how applications using network protocols are behaving, particularly where protocols have an encrypted wire image that restricts observers' ability to see what is happening.¶
Many applications implement logging using a custom, non-standard logging format. This has an effect on the tools and methods that are used to analyze the logs, for example to perform root cause analysis of an interoperability failure between distinct implementations. A lack of a common format impedes the development of common tooling that can be used by all parties that have access to logs.¶
qlog is an extensible structured logging for network protocols that allows for easy sharing of data that benefits common debug and analysis methods and tooling. This document describes key concepts of qlog: formats, files, traces, events, and extension points. This definition includes the high-level log file schemas, and generic event schemas. Requirements and guidelines for creating protocol-specific event schemas are also presented. Accompanying documents define event schema for QUIC ([QLOG-QUIC]) and HTTP/3 ([QLOG-H3]).¶
The goal of qlog is to provide amenities and default characteristics that each logging file should contain (or should be able to contain), such that generic and reusable toolsets can be created that can deal with logs from a variety of different protocols and use cases.¶
As such, qlog provides versioning, metadata inclusion, log aggregation, event grouping and log file size reduction techniques.¶
All qlog schemas can be serialized in many ways (e.g., JSON, CBOR, protobuf, etc). This document describes only how to employ [JSON], its subset [I-JSON], and its streamable derivative [JSON-Text-Sequences].¶
1.1. Conventions and Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
Serialization examples in this document use JSON ([JSON]) unless otherwise indicated.¶
1.2. Use of CDDL
To define events and data structures, all qlog documents use the Concise Data
Definition Language [CDDL]. This document uses the basic syntax, the
specific text
, uint
, float32
, float64
, bool
, and any
types, as well
as the .default
, .size
, and .regexp
control operators, the ~
unwrapping
operator, and the $
and $$
extension points syntax from [CDDL].¶
Additionally, this document defines the following custom types for clarity:¶
All timestamps and time-related values (e.g., offsets) in qlog are
logged as float64
in the millisecond resolution.¶
Other qlog documents can define their own CDDL-compatible (struct) types (e.g., separately for each Packet type that a protocol supports).¶
The ordering of member fields in qlog CDDL type definitions is not significant. The ordering of member fields in the serialization formats defined in this document, JSON (Section 11.1) and JSON Text Sequences (Section 11.2), is not significant and qlog tools MUST NOT assume so. Other qlog serialization formats MAY define field order significance, if they do they MUST define requirements for qlog tools supporting those formats.¶
-
Note to RFC editor: Please remove the following text in this section before publication.¶
The main general CDDL syntax conventions in this document a reader should be aware of for easy reading comprehension are:¶
-
? obj
: this object is optional¶ -
TypeName1 / TypeName2
: a union of these two types (object can be either type 1 OR type 2)¶ -
obj: TypeName
: this object has this concrete type¶ -
obj: [* TypeName]
: this object is an array of this type with minimum size of 0 elements¶ -
obj: [+ TypeName]
: this object is an array of this type with minimum size of 1 element¶ -
TypeName = ...
: defines a new type¶ -
EnumName = "entry1" / "entry2" / entry3 / ...
: defines an enum¶ -
StructName = { ... }
: defines a new struct type¶ -
;
: single-line comment¶ -
* text => any
: special syntax to indicate 0 or more fields that have a string key that maps to any value. Used to indicate a generic JSON object.¶
All timestamps and time-related values (e.g., offsets) in qlog are
logged as float64
in the millisecond resolution.¶
Other qlog documents can define their own CDDL-compatible (struct) types (e.g., separately for each Packet type that a protocol supports).¶
2. Design Overview
The main tenets for the qlog design are:¶
- Streamable, event-based logging¶
- A flexible format that can reduce log producer overhead, at the cost of increased complexity for consumers (e.g. tools)¶
- Extensible and pragmatic¶
- Aggregation and transformation friendly (e.g., the top-level element for the non-streaming format is a container for individual traces, group_ids can be used to tag events to a particular context)¶
- Metadata is stored together with event data¶
This is achieved by a logical logging hierarchy of:¶
An abstract LogFile class is declared (Section 3), from which all concrete log file formats derive using log file schemas. This document defines the QLogFile (Section 4) and QLogFileSeq (Section 5) log file schemas.¶
A trace is conceptually fluid but the conventional use case is to group events related to a single data flow, such as a single logical QUIC connection, at a single vantage point (Section 6). Concrete trace definitions relate to the log file schemas they are contained in; see (Section 4.1, Section 4.2, and Section 5.1).¶
Events are logged at a time instant and convey specific details of the logging use case. For example, a network packet being sent or received. This document declares an abstract Event class (Section 7) containing common fields, which all concrete events derive from. Concrete events are defined by event schemas that declare a namespace, consisting of one or more categories, containing one or more related event types. For example, this document defines the generic event schema structured as:¶
3. Abstract LogFile Class
A Log file is intended to contain a collection of events that are in some way related. An abstract LogFile class containing fields common to all log files is defined in Figure 2. Each concrete log file schema derives from this using the CDDL unwrap operator (~) and can extend it by defining semantics and any custom fields.¶
The required "file_schema" field identifies the concrete log file schema. It MUST have a value that is an absolute URI; see Section 3.1 for rules and guidance.¶
The required "serialization_format" field indicates the serialization format using a media type [RFC2046]. It is case-insensitive.¶
In order to make it easier to parse and identify qlog files and their serialization format, the "file_schema" and "serialization_format" fields and their values SHOULD be in the first 256 characters/bytes of the resulting log file.¶
The optional "title" and "description" fields provide additional free-text information about the file.¶
The required "event_schemas" field contains event schema URIs that identify concrete event categories and their associated types recorded in a log. Requirements and guidelines are defined in Section 8.¶
3.1. Concrete Log File Schema URIs
Concrete log file schemas MUST identify themselves using a URI [RFC3986].¶
Log file schemas defined by RFCs MUST register a URI in the "qlog log file
schema URIs" registry and SHOULD use a URN of the form
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:<schema-identifier>
, where <schema-identifier>
is
a globally-unique text name using only characters in the URI unreserved range;
see Section 2.3 of [RFC3986]. This document registers
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:contained
(Section 4) and
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:sequential
(Section 5).¶
Private or non-standard log file schemas MAY register a URI in the "qlog log
file schema URIs" registry but MUST NOT use a URN of the form
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:<schema-identifier>
. URIs that contain a domain name
SHOULD also contain a month-date in the form mmyyyy. For example,
"https://example.org/072024/globallyuniquelogfileschema". The definition of the
log file schema and assignment of the URI MUST have been authorized by the owner
of the domain name on or very close to that date. This avoids problems when
domain names change ownership. The URI does not need to be dereferencable,
allowing for confidential use or to cover the case where the log file schema
continues to be used after the organization that defined them ceases to exist.¶
The "qlog log file schema URIs" registry operates under the Expert Review
policy, per Section 4.5 of [RFC8126]. When reviewing requests, the expert
MUST check that the URI is appropriate to the concrete log file schema and
satisfies the requirements in this section. A request to register a private or
non-standard log file schema URI using a URN of the form
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:<schema-identifier>
MUST be rejected.¶
Registration requests should use the following template:¶
4. QlogFile schema
A qlog file using the QlogFile schema can contain several individual traces and logs from multiple vantage points that are in some way related. The top-level element in this schema defines only a small set of "header" fields and an array of component traces. This is defined in Figure 3 as:¶
The QlogFile schema URI is urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:contained
.¶
QlogFile extends LogFile using the CDDL unwrap operator (~), which copies the fields presented in Section 3. Additionally, the optional "traces" field contains an array of qlog traces (Section 4.2), each of which contain metadata and an array of qlog events (Section 7).¶
The default serialization format for QlogFile is JSON; see Section 11.1 for guidance on populating the "serialization_format" field and other considerations. Where a qlog file is serialized to a JSON format, one of the downsides is that it is inherently a non-streamable format. Put differently, it is not possible to simply append new qlog events to a log file without "closing" this file at the end by appending "]}]}". Without these closing tags, most JSON parsers will be unable to parse the file entirely. The alternative QlogFileSeq (Section 5) is better suited to streaming use cases.¶
JSON serialization example:¶
4.1. Traces
It can be advantageous to group several related qlog traces together in a single file. For example, it is possible to simultaneously perform logging on the client, on the server, and on a single point on their common network path. For analysis, it is useful to aggregate these three individual traces together into a single file, so it can be uniquely stored, transferred, and annotated.¶
The QlogFile "traces" field is an array that contains a list of individual qlog traces. When capturing a qlog at a vantage point, it is expected that the traces field contains a single entry. Files can be aggregated, for example as part of a post-processing operation, by copying the traces in component to files into the combined "traces" array of a new, aggregated qlog file.¶
4.2. Trace
The exact conceptual definition of a Trace can be fluid. For example, a trace could contain all events for a single connection, for a single endpoint, for a single measurement interval, for a single protocol, etc. In the normal use case however, a trace is a log of a single data flow collected at a single location or vantage point. For example, for QUIC, a single trace only contains events for a single logical QUIC connection for either the client or the server.¶
A Trace contains some metadata in addition to qlog events, defined in Figure 5 as:¶
The optional "title" and "description" fields provide additional free-text information about the trace.¶
The optional "common_fields" field is described in Section 7.7.¶
The optional "vantage_point" field is described in Section 6.¶
The semantics and context of the trace can mainly be deduced from the entries in the "common_fields" list and "vantage_point" field.¶
JSON serialization example:¶
4.3. TraceError
A TraceError indicates that an attempt to find/convert a file for inclusion in the aggregated qlog was made, but there was an error during the process. Rather than silently dropping the erroneous file, it can be explicitly included in the qlog file as an entry in the "traces" array, defined in Figure 7 as:¶
JSON serialization example:¶
Note that another way to combine events of different traces in a single qlog file is through the use of the "group_id" field, discussed in Section 7.5.¶
5. QlogFileSeq schema
A qlog file using the QlogFileSeq schema can be serialized to a streamable JSON format called JSON Text Sequences (JSON-SEQ) ([RFC7464]). The top-level element in this schema defines only a small set of "header" fields and an array of component traces. This is defined in Figure 3 as:¶
The QlogFileSeq schema URI is urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:sequential
.¶
QlogFile extends LogFile using the CDDL unwrap operator (~), which copies the fields presented in Section 3. Additionally, the required "trace" field contains a singular trace (Section 4.2). All qlog events in the file are related to this trace; see Section 5.1.¶
See Section 11.2 for guidance on populating the "serialization_format" field and other serialization considerations.¶
JSON-SEQ serialization example:¶
6. VantagePoint
A VantagePoint describes the vantage point from which a trace originates, defined in Figure 12 as:¶
JSON serialization examples:¶
The flow field is only required if the type is "network" (for example, the trace is generated from a packet capture). It is used to disambiguate events like "packet sent" and "packet received". This is indicated explicitly because for multiple reasons (e.g., privacy) data from which the flow direction can be otherwise inferred (e.g., IP addresses) might not be present in the logs.¶
Meaning of the different values for the flow field: * "client" indicates that this vantage point follows client data flow semantics (a "packet sent" event goes in the direction of the server). * "server" indicates that this vantage point follow server data flow semantics (a "packet sent" event goes in the direction of the client). * "unknown" indicates that the flow's direction is unknown.¶
Depending on the context, tools confronted with "unknown" values in the vantage_point can either try to heuristically infer the semantics from protocol-level domain knowledge (e.g., in QUIC, the client always sends the first packet) or give the user the option to switch between client and server perspectives manually.¶
7. Abstract Event Class
Events are logged at a time instant and convey specific details of the logging use case. An abstract Event class containing fields common to all events is defined in Figure 14.¶
Each qlog event MUST contain the mandatory fields: "time" (Section 7.1), "name" (Section 8), and "data" (Section 8.2).¶
Each qlog event is an instance of a concrete event type that derives from the
abstract Event class; see Section 8. They extend it by defining
the specific values and semantics of common fields, in particular the name
and
data
fields. Furthermore, they can optionally add custom fields.¶
Each qlog event MAY contain the optional fields: "time_format" (Section 7.1), "protocol_type" (Section 7.3), "trigger" (Section 7.4), and "group_id" (Section 7.5).¶
Multiple events can appear in a Trace or TraceSeq and they might contain fields with identical values. It is possible to optimize out this duplication using "common_fields" (Section 7.7).¶
Example qlog event:¶
7.1. Timestamps
An event's "time" field indicates the timestamp at which the event occurred. Its value is typically the Unix timestamp since the 1970 epoch (number of milliseconds since midnight UTC, January 1, 1970, ignoring leap seconds). However, qlog supports two more succinct timestamps formats to allow reducing file size. The employed format is indicated in the "time_format" field, which allows one of three values: "absolute", "delta" or "relative".¶
- Absolute: Include the full absolute timestamp with each event. This approach uses the largest amount of characters. This is also the default value of the "time_format" field.¶
- Delta: Delta-encode each time value on the previously logged value. The first event in a trace typically logs the full absolute timestamp. This approach uses the least amount of characters.¶
- Relative: Specify a full "reference_time" timestamp (typically this is done up-front in "common_fields", see Section 7.7) and include only relatively-encoded values based on this reference_time with each event. The "reference_time" value is typically the first absolute timestamp. This approach uses a medium amount of characters.¶
The first option is good for stateless loggers, the second and third for stateful loggers. The third option is generally preferred, since it produces smaller files while being easier to reason about. An example for each option can be seen in Figure 17.¶
One of these options is typically chosen for the entire trace (put differently: each event has the same value for the "time_format" field). Each event MUST include a timestamp in the "time" field.¶
Events in each individual trace SHOULD be logged in strictly ascending timestamp order (though not necessarily absolute value, for the "delta" format). Tools MAY sort all events on the timestamp before processing them, though are not required to (as this could impose a significant processing overhead). This can be a problem especially for multi-threaded and/or streaming loggers, who could consider using a separate post-processor to order qlog events in time if a tool do not provide this feature.¶
Timestamps do not have to use the UNIX epoch timestamp as their reference. For example for privacy considerations, any initial reference timestamps (for example "endpoint uptime in ms" or "time since connection start in ms") can be chosen. Tools SHOULD NOT assume the ability to derive the absolute Unix timestamp from qlog traces, nor allow on them to relatively order events across two or more separate traces (in this case, clock drift should also be taken into account).¶
7.2. Path
A qlog event can be associated with a single "network path" (usually, but not always, identified by a 4-tuple of IP addresses and ports). In many cases, the path will be the same for all events in a given trace, and does not need to be logged explicitly with each event. In this case, the "path" field can be omitted (in which case the default value of "" is assumed) or reflected in "common_fields" instead (see Section 7.7).¶
However, in some situations, such as during QUIC's Connection Migration or when using Multipath features, it is useful to be able to split events across multiple (concurrent) paths.¶
Definition:¶
The "path" field is an identifier that is associated with a single network path. This document intentionally does not define further how to choose this identifier's value per-path or how to potentially log other parameters that can be associated with such a path. This is left for other documents. Implementers are free to encode path information directly into the PathID or to log associated info in a separate event. For example, QUIC has the "path_assigned" event to couple the PathID value to a specific path configuration, see [QLOG-QUIC].¶
7.3. ProtocolTypeList and ProtocolType
An event's "protocol_type" array field indicates to which protocols (or protocol "stacks") this event belongs. This allows a single qlog file to aggregate traces of different protocols (e.g., a web server offering both TCP+HTTP/2 and QUIC+HTTP/3 connections).¶
For example, QUIC and HTTP/3 events have the "QUIC" and "HTTP3" protocol_type entry values, see [QLOG-QUIC] and [QLOG-H3].¶
Typically however, all events in a single trace are of the same few protocols, and this array field is logged once in "common_fields", see Section 7.7.¶
7.4. Triggers
Sometimes, additional information is needed in the case where a single event can be caused by a variety of other events. In the normal case, the context of the surrounding log messages gives a hint as to which of these other events was the cause. However, in highly-parallel and optimized implementations, corresponding log messages might separated in time. Another option is to explicitly indicate these "triggers" in a high-level way per-event to get more fine-grained information without much additional overhead.¶
In qlog, the optional "trigger" field contains a string value describing the reason (if any) for this event instance occurring, see Section 8.2. While this "trigger" field could be a property of the qlog Event itself, it is instead a property of the "data" field instead. This choice was made because many event types do not include a trigger value, and having the field at the Event-level would cause overhead in some serializations. Additional information on the trigger can be added in the form of additional member fields of the "data" field value, yet this is highly implementation-specific, as are the trigger field's string values.¶
One purely illustrative example of some potential triggers for QUIC's "packet_dropped" event is shown in Figure 20:¶
7.5. Grouping
As discussed in Section 4.2, a single qlog file can contain several traces taken from different vantage points. However, a single trace from one endpoint can also contain events from a variety of sources. For example, a server implementation might choose to log events for all incoming connections in a single large (streamed) qlog file. As such, a method for splitting up events belonging to separate logical entities is required.¶
The simplest way to perform this splitting is by associating a "group id" to each event that indicates to which conceptual "group" each event belongs. A post-processing step can then extract events per group. However, this group identifier can be highly protocol and context-specific. In the example above, the QUIC "Original Destination Connection ID" could be used to uniquely identify a connection. As such, they might add a "ODCID" field to each event. However, a middlebox logging IP or TCP traffic might rather use four-tuples to identify connections, and add a "four_tuple" field.¶
As such, to provide consistency and ease of tooling in cross-protocol and cross-context setups, qlog instead defines the common "group_id" field, which contains a string value. Implementations are free to use their preferred string serialization for this field, so long as it contains a unique value per logical group. Some examples can be seen in Figure 22.¶
JSON serialization example for events grouped by four tuples and QUIC connection IDs:¶
Note that in some contexts (for example a Multipath transport protocol) it might make sense to add additional contextual per-event fields (for example "path_id"), rather than use the group_id field for that purpose.¶
Note also that, typically, a single trace only contains events belonging to a single logical group (for example, an individual QUIC connection). As such, instead of logging the "group_id" field with an identical value for each event instance, this field is typically logged once in "common_fields", see Section 7.7.¶
7.6. SystemInformation
The "system_info" field can be used to record system-specific details related to an event. This is useful, for instance, where an application splits work across CPUs, processes, or threads and events for a single trace occur on potentially different combinations thereof. Each field is optional to support deployment diversity.¶
SystemInformation = { ? processor_id: uint32 ? process_id: uint32 ? thread_id: uint32 }¶
7.7. CommonFields
As discussed in the previous sections, information for a typical qlog event varies in three main fields: "time", "name" and associated data. Additionally, there are also several more advanced fields that allow mixing events from different protocols and contexts inside of the same trace (for example "protocol_type" and "group_id"). In most "normal" use cases however, the values of these advanced fields are consistent for each event instance (for example, a single trace contains events for a single QUIC connection).¶
To reduce file size and making logging easier, qlog uses the "common_fields" list to indicate those fields and their values that are shared by all events in this component trace. This prevents these fields from being logged for each individual event. An example of this is shown in Figure 23.¶
An event's "common_fields" field is a generic dictionary of key-value pairs, where the key is always a string and the value can be of any type, but is typically also a string or number. As such, unknown entries in this dictionary MUST be disregarded by the user and tools (i.e., the presence of an unknown field is explicitly NOT an error).¶
The list of default qlog fields that are typically logged in common_fields (as opposed to as individual fields per event instance) are shown in the listing below:¶
Tools MUST be able to deal with these fields being defined either on each event individually or combined in common_fields. Note that if at least one event in a trace has a different value for a given field, this field MUST NOT be added to common_fields but instead defined on each event individually. Good example of such fields are "time" and "data", who are divergent by nature.¶
8. Concrete Event Types and Event Schema
Concrete event types belong to event categories, both contained in event schema.¶
A single event schema can either define a new namespace, or extend an existing namespace with new categories. New namespaces MUST be registered using a non-empty namespace identifier text identifier using only characters in the unreserved range; see Section 2.3 of [RFC3986]. Namespace are mutable and MAY be extended with categories.¶
Event categories MUST belong to a single event namespace. They MUST have a registered non-empty globally-unique text identifier using only characters in the URI unreserved range; see Section 2.3 of [RFC3986]. They MUST have a single URI [RFC3986] that MUST be absolute. The URI MUST include the namespace identifier. The URI MUST include the category identifer using a fragment identifier (characters after a "#" in the URI). Event categories are immutable and MUST NOT be extended with events. Registration guidance and requirement for category URIs are provided in Section 8.1.¶
Concrete event types MUST belong to a single event category and MUST have a
non-empty name of type text
.¶
The value of a qlog event name
field MUST be the concatenation of category
identifier, colon (':'), and event type identifier. By virtue of the identifier
requirements described above, event names are globally-unique. Thus, log files
can contain events from multiple schemas without the risk of name collisions.¶
Implementations that might record concrete event types belonging to a category
in an event schema SHOULD list all category identifiers in use. This is achieved
by including the appropriate URIs in the event_schemas
field of the abstract
LogFile class (Section 3). The event_schemas
is a hint to tools
about the possible event categories (and event types contained therein) that a
qlog file might contain. The file MAY contain event types that do not belong to
a listed category identifier. Inversely, not all event types associated with a
category listed in event_schemas
are guaranteed to be logged in a qlog file.
Tools MUST NOT treat either of these as an error; see Section 13.¶
In the following hypothetical example, a qlog file contains events belonging to
two categories in the generic event schema defined in this document
(Section 9), to three categories in an event schema named rick
specified in a hypothetical RFC, and to three more categories from a private
event schema named pickle. The standardized category URIs use a URN format, the
private categories use a URI with domain name.¶
8.1. Event Schema and Event Category URIs
Event schema defined by RFCs MUST register all categories in the "qlog event
category URIs" registry and SHOULD use a URN of the form
urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:<namespace identifier>#<category identifier>
,
where <category identifier>
is globally unique. For example, this document
defines the generic event schema (Section 9) that uses the gen
namespace containing the loglevel
and sim
categories. Other examples of
event schema define the quic
[QLOG-QUIC] and http
[QLOG-H3] namespaces.¶
Private or non-standard event categories MAY be registered in the "qlog event
category URIs" registry but MUST NOT use a URN of the form
urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:<namespace identifier>#<category identifier>
. URIs
that contain a domain name SHOULD also contain a month-date in the form mmyyyy.
For example,
"https://example.org/072024/customeventschema#globallyuniquecategory". The
definition of the category and assignment of the URI MUST have been authorized
by the owner of the domain name on or very close to that date. This avoids
problems when domain names change ownership. The URI does not need to be
dereferencable, allowing for confidential use or to cover the case where the log
file schema continues to be used after the organization that defined them ceases
to exist.¶
The "qlog event category URIs" registry operates under the Expert Review policy,
per Section 4.5 of [RFC8126]. When reviewing requests, the expert MUST check
that the URI is appropriate to the event schema and satisfies the requirements
in Section 8 and this section. A request to register a private
or non-standard category URI using a URN of the form
urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:<namespace identifier>#<category identifier
MUST be
rejected.¶
Registration requests should use the following template:¶
8.2. Extending the Data Field
An event's "data" field is a generic key-value map (e.g., JSON object). It defines the per-event metadata that is to be logged. Its specific subfields and their semantics are defined per concrete event type. For example, data field definitions for QUIC and HTTP/3 can be found in [QLOG-QUIC] and [QLOG-H3].¶
In order to keep qlog fully extensible, two separate CDDL extension points ("sockets" or "plugs") are used to fully define data fields.¶
Firstly, to allow existing data field definitions to be extended (for example by
adding an additional field needed for a new protocol feature), a CDDL "group
socket" is used. This takes the form of a subfield with a name of
* $$CATEGORY-NAME-extension
. This field acts as a placeholder that can later be
replaced with newly defined fields by assigning them to the socket with the
//=
operator. Multiple extensions can be assigned to the same group socket. An
example is shown in Figure 26.¶
Secondly, to allow documents to define fully new event data field definitions
(as opposed to extend existing ones), a CDDL "type socket" is used. For this
purpose, the type of the "data" field in the qlog Event type (see Figure 14)
is the extensible $ProtocolEventData
type. This field acts as an open enum of
possible types that are allowed for the data field. As such, any new event data
field is defined as its own CDDL type and later merged with the existing
$ProtocolEventData
enum using the /=
extension operator. Any generic
key-value map type can be assigned to $ProtocolEventData
(the only common
"data" subfield defined in this document is the optional trigger
field, see
Section 7.4). An example of this setup is shown in
Figure 27.¶
Documents defining new qlog events MUST properly extend $ProtocolEventData
when defining data fields to enable automated validation of aggregated qlog
schemas. Furthermore, they SHOULD properly add a * $$CATEGORY-NAME-extension
extension field to newly defined event data to allow the new events to be
properly extended by other documents.¶
A combined but purely illustrative example of the use of both extension points for a conceptual QUIC "packet_sent" event is shown in Figure 28:¶
8.3. Event Importance Levels
Depending on how events are designed, it may be that several events allow the
logging of similar or overlapping data. For example the separate QUIC
connection_started
event overlaps with the more generic
connection_state_updated
. In these cases, it is not always clear which event
should be logged or used, and which event should take precedence if e.g., both are
present and provide conflicting information.¶
To aid in this decision making, qlog defines three event importance levels, in decreasing order of importance and expected usage:¶
Concrete event types SHOULD define an importance level.¶
Core-level events SHOULD be present in all qlog files for a given protocol. These are typically tied to basic packet and frame parsing and creation, as well as listing basic internal metrics. Tool implementers SHOULD expect and add support for these events, though SHOULD NOT expect all Core events to be present in each qlog trace.¶
Base-level events add additional debugging options and MAY be present in qlog files. Most of these can be implicitly inferred from data in Core events (if those contain all their properties), but for many it is better to log the events explicitly as well, making it clearer how the implementation behaves. These events are for example tied to passing data around in buffers, to how internal state machines change, and used to help show when decisions are actually made based on received data. Tool implementers SHOULD at least add support for showing the contents of these events, if they do not handle them explicitly.¶
Extra-level events are considered mostly useful for low-level debugging of the implementation, rather than the protocol. They allow more fine-grained tracking of internal behavior. As such, they MAY be present in qlog files and tool implementers MAY add support for these, but they are not required to.¶
Note that in some cases, implementers might not want to log for example data
content details in Core-level events due to performance or privacy considerations.
In this case, they SHOULD use (a subset of) relevant Base-level events instead to
ensure usability of the qlog output. As an example, implementations that do not
log QUIC packet_received
events and thus also not which (if any) ACK frames the
packet contains, SHOULD log packets_acked
events instead.¶
Finally, for event types whose data (partially) overlap with other event types' definitions, where necessary the event definition document should include explicit guidance on which to use in specific situations.¶
8.4. Tooling Expectations
qlog is an extensible format and it is expected that new event schema will emerge that define new categories, event types, event fields (e.g., a field indicating an event's privacy properties), as well as values for the "trigger" property within the "data" field, or other member fields of the "data" field, as they see fit.¶
It SHOULD NOT be expected that general-purpose tools will recognize or visualize all forms of qlog extension. Tools SHOULD allow for the presence of unknown event fields and make an effort to visualize even unknown data if possible, otherwise they MUST ignore it.¶
8.5. Further Design Guidance
There are several ways of defining concrete event types. In practice, two main
types of approach have been observed: a) those that map directly to concepts
seen in the protocols (e.g., packet_sent
) and b) those that act as aggregating
events that combine data from several possible protocol behaviors or code paths
into one (e.g., parameters_set
). The latter are typically used as a means to
reduce the amount of unique event definitions, as reflecting each possible
protocol event as a separate qlog entity would cause an explosion of event
types.¶
Additionally, logging duplicate data is typically prevented as much as possible.
For example, packet header values that remain consistent across many packets are
split into separate events (for example spin_bit_updated
or
connection_id_updated
for QUIC).¶
Finally, when logging additional state change events, those state changes can
often be directly inferred from data on the wire (for example flow control limit
changes). As such, if the implementation is bug-free and spec-compliant, logging
additional events is typically avoided. Exceptions have been made for common
events that benefit from being easily identifiable or individually logged (for
example packets_acked
).¶
9. The Generic Event Schema
The generic event schema defines categories and event types that are common across protocols, applications, and use cases. The schema namespace identifier is "gen".¶
9.1. Log Level Events
In typical logging setups, users utilize a discrete number of well-defined
logging categories, levels or severities to log freeform (string) data. The log
level event category replicates this approach to allow implementations to fully
replace their existing text-based logging by qlog. This is done by providing
events to log generic strings for the typical well-known logging levels (error,
warning, info, debug, verbose). The category identifier is "loglevel". The
category URI is is urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:gen#loglevel
.¶
The event types are further defined below, their identifier is the heading name.¶
9.1.1. error
Used to log details of an internal error that might not get reflected on the wire. It has Core importance level; see Section 8.3.¶
9.1.2. warning
Used to log details of an internal warning that might not get reflected on the wire. It has Base importance level; see Section 8.3.¶
9.1.3. info
Used mainly for implementations that want to use qlog as their one and only logging format but still want to support unstructured string messages. The event has Extra importance level; see Section 8.3.¶
9.1.4. debug
Used mainly for implementations that want to use qlog as their one and only logging format but still want to support unstructured string messages. The event has Extra importance level; see Section 8.3.¶
9.1.5. verbose
Used mainly for implementations that want to use qlog as their one and only logging format but still want to support unstructured string messages. The event has Extra importance level; see Section 8.3.¶
9.2. Simulation Events
When evaluating a protocol implementation, one typically sets up a series of
interoperability or benchmarking tests, in which the test situations can change
over time. For example, the network bandwidth or latency can vary during the
test, or the network can be fully disable for a short time. In these setups, it
is useful to know when exactly these conditions are triggered, to allow for
proper correlation with other events. This category defines event types to allow
logging of such simulation metadata and its identifier is "sim". The category
URI is urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:gen#sim
.¶
The event types are further defined below, their identifier is the heading name.¶
9.2.1. scenario
Used to specify which specific scenario is being tested at this particular
instance. This supports, for example, aggregation of several simulations into
one trace (e.g., split by group_id
). It has Extra importance level; see
Section 8.3.¶
9.2.2. marker
Used to indicate when specific emulation conditions are triggered at set times (e.g., at 3 seconds in 2% packet loss is introduced, at 10s a NAT rebind is triggered). It has Extra importance level; see Section 8.3.¶
10. Raw packet and frame information
While qlog is a high-level logging format, it also allows the inclusion of most raw wire image information, such as byte lengths and byte values. This is useful when for example investigating or tuning packetization behavior or determining encoding/framing overheads. However, these fields are not always necessary, can take up considerable space, and can have a considerable privacy and security impact (see Section 14). Where applicable, these fields are grouped in a separate, optional, field named "raw" of type RawInfo. The exact definition of entities, headers, trailers and payloads depend on the protocol used.¶
The RawInfo:data field can be truncated for privacy or security purposes, see Section 11.4. In this case, the length and payload_length fields should still indicate the non-truncated lengths when used for debugging purposes.¶
This document does not specify explicit header_length or trailer_length fields. In protocols without trailers, header_length can be calculated by subtracting the payload_length from the length. In protocols with trailers (e.g., QUIC's AEAD tag), event definition documents SHOULD define how to support header_length calculation.¶
11. Serializing qlog
qlog schema definitions in this document are intentionally agnostic to serialization formats. The choice of format is an implementation decision.¶
Other documents related to qlog (for example event definitions for specific protocols), SHOULD be similarly agnostic to the employed serialization format and SHOULD clearly indicate this. If not, they MUST include an explanation on which serialization formats are supported and on how to employ them correctly.¶
Serialization formats make certain tradeoffs between usability, flexibility, interoperability, and efficiency. Implementations should take these into consideration when choosing a format. Some examples of possible formats are JSON, CBOR, CSV, protocol buffers, flatbuffers, etc. which each have their own characteristics. For instance, a textual format like JSON can be more flexible than a binary format but more verbose, typically making it less efficient than a binary format. A plaintext readable (yet relatively large) format like JSON is potentially more usable for users operating on the logs directly, while a more optimized yet restricted format can better suit the constraints of a large scale operation. A custom or restricted format could be more efficient for analysis with custom tooling but might not be interoperable with general-purpose qlog tools.¶
Considering these tradeoffs, JSON-based serialization formats provide features that make them a good starting point for qlog flexibility and interoperability. For these reasons, JSON is a recommended default and expanded considerations are given to how to map qlog to JSON (Section 11.1, and its streaming counterpart JSON Text Sequences (Section 11.2. Section 11.3 presents interoperability considerations for both formats, and Section 11.5 presents potential optimizations.¶
Serialization formats require appropriate deserializers/parsers. The "serialization_format" field (Section 3) is used to indicate the chosen serialization format.¶
11.1. qlog to JSON mapping
As described in Section 4, JSON is the default qlog serialization. When mapping qlog to normal JSON, QlogFile (Figure 3) is used. The Media Type is "application/qlog+json" per [RFC6839]. The file extension/suffix SHOULD be ".qlog".¶
In accordance with Section 8.1 of [RFC8259], JSON files are required to use UTF-8 both for the file itself and the string values it contains. In addition, all qlog field names MUST be lowercase when serialized to JSON.¶
In order to serialize CDDL-based qlog event and data structure definitions to JSON, the official CDDL-to-JSON mapping defined in Appendix E of [CDDL] SHOULD be employed.¶
11.2. qlog to JSON Text Sequences mapping
One of the downsides of using normal JSON is that it is inherently a non-streamable format. A qlog serializer could work around this by opening a file, writing the required opening data, streaming qlog events by appending them, and then finalizing the log by appending appropriate closing tags e.g., "]}]}". However, failure to append closing tags, could lead to problems because most JSON parsers will fail if a document is malformed. Some streaming JSON parsers are able to handle missing closing tags, however they are not widely deployed in popular environments (e.g., Web browsers)¶
To overcome the issues related to JSON streaming, a qlog mapping to a streamable JSON format called JSON Text Sequences (JSON-SEQ) ([RFC7464]) is provided.¶
JSON Text Sequences are very similar to JSON, except that objects are serialized as individual records, each prefixed by an ASCII Record Separator (<RS>, 0x1E), and each ending with an ASCII Line Feed character (\n, 0x0A). Note that each record can also contain any amount of newlines in its body, as long as it ends with a newline character before the next <RS> character.¶
In order to leverage the streaming capability, each qlog event is serialized and interpreted as an individual JSON Text Sequence record, that is appended as a new object to the back of an event stream or log file. Put differently, unlike default JSON, it does not require a document to be wrapped as a full object with "{ ... }" or "[... ]".¶
This alternative record streaming approach cannot be accommodated by QlogFile (Figure 3). Instead, QlogFileSeq is defined in Figure 9, which notably includes only a single trace (TraceSeq) and omits an explicit "events" array. An example is provided in Figure 10. The "group_id" field can still be used on a per-event basis to include events from conceptually different sources in a single JSON-SEQ qlog file.¶
When mapping qlog to JSON-SEQ, the Media Type is "application/qlog+json-seq" per [RFC8091]. The file extension/suffix SHOULD be ".sqlog" (for "streaming" qlog).¶
While not specifically required by the JSON-SEQ specification, all qlog field names MUST be lowercase when serialized to JSON-SEQ.¶
In order to serialize all other CDDL-based qlog event and data structure definitions to JSON-SEQ, the official CDDL-to-JSON mapping defined in Appendix E of [CDDL] SHOULD be employed.¶
11.2.1. Supporting JSON Text Sequences in tooling
Note that JSON Text Sequences are not supported in most default programming environments (unlike normal JSON). However, several custom JSON-SEQ parsing libraries exist in most programming languages that can be used and the format is easy enough to parse with existing implementations (i.e., by splitting the file into its component records and feeding them to a normal JSON parser individually, as each record by itself is a valid JSON object).¶
11.3. JSON Interoperability
Some JSON implementations have issues with the full JSON format, especially those integrated within a JavaScript environment (e.g., Web browsers, NodeJS). I-JSON (Internet-JSON) is a subset of JSON for such environments; see [I-JSON]. One of the key limitations of JavaScript, and thus I-JSON, is that it cannot represent full 64-bit integers in standard operating mode (i.e., without using BigInt extensions), instead being limited to the range -(253)+1 to (253)-1.¶
To accommodate such constraints in CDDL, Appendix E of [CDDL] recommends defining new CDDL types for int64 and uint64 that limit their values to the restricted 64-bit integer range. However, some of the protocols that qlog is intended to support (e.g., QUIC, HTTP/3), can use the full range of uint64 values.¶
As such, to support situations where I-JSON is in use, seralizers MAY encode uint64 values using JSON strings. qlog parsers, therefore, SHOULD support parsing of uint64 values from JSON strings or JSON numbers unless there is out-of-band information indicating that neither the serializer nor parser are constrained by I-JSON.¶
11.4. Truncated values
For some use cases (e.g., limiting file size, privacy), it can be
necessary not to log a full raw blob (using the hexstring
type) but
instead a truncated value. For example, one might only store the first 100 bytes of an
HTTP response body to be able to discern which file it actually
contained. In these cases, the original byte-size length cannot be
obtained from the serialized value directly.¶
As such, all qlog schema definitions SHOULD include a separate,
length-indicating field for all fields of type hexstring
they specify,
see for example Section 10. This not only ensures the original length
can always be retrieved, but also allows the omission of any raw value
bytes of the field completely (e.g., out of privacy or security
considerations).¶
To reduce overhead however and in the case the full raw value is logged, the extra length-indicating field can be left out. As such, tools MUST be able to deal with this situation and derive the length of the field from the raw value if no separate length-indicating field is present. The main possible permutations are shown by example in Figure 39.¶
11.5. Optimization of serialized data
Both the JSON and JSON-SEQ formatting options described above are serviceable in general small to medium scale (debugging) setups. However, these approaches tend to be relatively verbose, leading to larger file sizes. Additionally, generalized JSON(-SEQ) (de)serialization performance is typically (slightly) lower than that of more optimized and predictable formats. Both aspects present challenges to large scale setups, though they may still be practical to deploy; see [ANRW-2020]. JSON and JSON-SEQ compress very well using commonly-available algorithms such as GZIP or Brotli.¶
During the development of qlog, a multitude of alternative formatting and optimization options were assessed and the results are summarized on the qlog github repository.¶
Formal definition of additional qlog formats or encodings that use the optimization techniques described here, or any other optimization technique is left to future activity that can apply the following guidelines.¶
In order to help tools correctly parse and process serialized qlog, it is RECOMMENDED that new formats also define suitable file extensions and media types. This provides a clear signal and avoids the need to provide out-of-band information or to rely on heuristic fallbacks; see Section 13.¶
12. Methods of access and generation
Different implementations will have different ways of generating and storing qlogs. However, there is still value in defining a few default ways in which to steer this generation and access of the results.¶
12.1. Set file output destination via an environment variable
To provide users control over where and how qlog files are created, two environment variables are defined. The first, QLOGFILE, indicates a full path to where an individual qlog file should be stored. This path MUST include the full file extension. The second, QLOGDIR, sets a general directory path in which qlog files should be placed. This path MUST include the directory separator character at the end.¶
In general, QLOGDIR should be preferred over QLOGFILE if an endpoint is prone to generate multiple qlog files. This can for example be the case for a QUIC server implementation that logs each QUIC connection in a separate qlog file. An alternative that uses QLOGFILE would be a QUIC server that logs all connections in a single file and uses the "group_id" field (Section 7.5) to allow post-hoc separation of events.¶
Implementations SHOULD provide support for QLOGDIR and MAY provide support for QLOGFILE.¶
When using QLOGDIR, it is up to the implementation to choose an appropriate naming scheme for the qlog files themselves. The chosen scheme will typically depend on the context or protocols used. For example, for QUIC, it is recommended to use the Original Destination Connection ID (ODCID), followed by the vantage point type of the logging endpoint. Examples of all options for QUIC are shown in Figure 40.¶
13. Tooling requirements
Tools ingestion qlog MUST indicate which qlog version(s), qlog format(s), compression methods and potentially other input file formats (for example .pcap) they support. Tools SHOULD at least support .qlog files in the default JSON format (Section 11.1). Additionally, they SHOULD indicate exactly which values for and properties of the name (category and type) and data fields they look for to execute their logic. Tools SHOULD perform a (high-level) check if an input qlog file adheres to the expected qlog schema. If a tool determines a qlog file does not contain enough supported information to correctly execute the tool's logic, it SHOULD generate a clear error message to this effect.¶
Tools MUST NOT produce breaking errors for any field names and/or values in the qlog format that they do not recognize. Tools SHOULD indicate even unknown event occurrences within their context (e.g., marking unknown events on a timeline for manual interpretation by the user).¶
Tool authors should be aware that, depending on the logging implementation, some events will not always be present in all traces. For example, using a circular logging buffer of a fixed size, it could be that the earliest events (e.g., connection setup events) are later overwritten by "newer" events. Alternatively, some events can be intentionally omitted out of privacy or file size considerations. Tool authors are encouraged to make their tools robust enough to still provide adequate output for incomplete logs.¶
14. Security and privacy considerations
Protocols such as TLS [RFC8446] and QUIC [RFC9000] offer secure protection for the wire image [RFC8546]. Logging can reveal aspects of the wire image that would ordinarily be protected, creating tension between observability, security and privacy, especially if data can be correlated across data sources.¶
qlog permits logging of a broad and detailed range of data. Operators and implementers are responsible for deciding what data is logged to address their requirements and constraints. As per [RFC6973], operators must be aware that data could be compromised, risking the privacy of all participants. Where entities expect protocol features to ensure data privacy, logging might unknowingly be subject to broader privacy risks, undermining their ability to assess or respond effectively.¶
14.1. Data at risk
qlog operators and implementers need to consider security and privacy risks when handling qlog data, including logging, storage, usage, and more. The considerations presented in this section may pose varying risks depending on the the data itself or its handling.¶
The following is a non-exhaustive list of example data types that could contain sensitive information that might allow identification or correlation of individual connections, endpoints, users or sessions across qlog or other data sources (e.g., captures of encrypted packets):¶
- IP addresses and transport protocol port numbers.¶
- Session, Connection, or User identifiers e.g., QUIC Connection IDs Section 9.5 of [RFC9000]).¶
- System-level information e.g., CPU, process, or thread identifiers.¶
- Stored State e.g., QUIC address validation and retry tokens, TLS session tickets, and HTTP cookies.¶
- TLS decryption keys, passwords, and HTTP-level API access or authorization tokens.¶
- High-resolution event timestamps or inter-event timings, event counts, packet sizes, and frame sizes.¶
- Full or partial raw packet and frame payloads that are encrypted.¶
- Full or partial raw packet and frame payloads that are plaintext e.g., HTTP Field values, HTTP response data, or TLS SNI field values.¶
14.2. Operational implications and recommendations
Operational considerations should focus on authorizing capture and access to logs. Logging of Internet protocols using qlog can be equivalent to the ability to store or read plaintext communications. Without a more detailed analysis, all of the security considerations of plaintext access apply.¶
It is recommended that qlog capture is subject to access control and auditing. These controls should support granular levels of information capture based on role and permissions (e.g., capture of more-sensitive data requires higher privileges).¶
It is recommended that access to stored qlogs is subject to access control and auditing.¶
End users might not understand the implications of qlog to security or privacy, and their environments might limit access control techniques. Implementations should make enabling qlog conspicuous (e.g., requiring clear and explicit actions to start a capture) and resistant to social engineering, automation, or drive-by attacks; for example, isolation or sandboxing of capture from other activities in the same process or component.¶
It is recommended that data retention policies are defined for the storage of qlog files.¶
It is recommended that qlog files are encrypted in transit and at rest.¶
14.3. Data minimization or anonymization
Applying data minimization or anonymization techniques to qlog might help address some security and privacy risks. However, removing or anonymizing data without sufficient care might not enhance privacy or security and could diminish the utility of qlog data.¶
Operators and implementers should balance the value of logged data with the potential risks of voluntary or involuntary disclosure to trusted or untrusted entities. Importantly, both the breadth and depth of the data needed to make it useful, as well as the definition of entities depend greatly on the intended use cases. For example, a research project might be tightly scoped, time bound, and require participants to explicitly opt in to having their data collected with the intention for this to be shared in a publication. Conversely, a server administrator might desire to collect telemetry, from users whom they have no relationship with, for continuing operational needs.¶
The most extreme form of minimization or anonymization is deleting a field, equivalent to not logging it. qlog implementations should offer fine-grained control for this on a per-use-case or per-connection basis.¶
Data can undergo anonymization, pseudonymization, permutation, truncation, re-encryption, or aggregation; see Appendix B of [DNS-PRIVACY] for techniques, especially regarding IP addresses. However, operators should be cautious because many anonymization methods have been shown to be insufficient to safeguard user privacy or identity, particularly with large or easily correlated data sets.¶
Operators should consider end user rights and preferences. Active user participation (as indicated by [RFC6973]) on a per-qlog basis is challenging but aligning qlog capture, storage, and removal with existing user preference and privacy controls is crucial. Operators should consider agressive approaches to deletion or aggregation.¶
The most sensitive data in qlog is typically contained in RawInfo type fields (see Section 10). Therefore, qlog users should exercise caution and limit the inclusion of such fields for all but the most stringent use cases.¶
15. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to register a new entry in the "IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameter Identifiers" registry ([RFC3553])":¶
IANA is requested to create the "qlog log file schema URIs" registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/qlog for the purpose of registering log file schema. It has the following format:¶
Log File Schema URI | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:contained | Concrete log file schema that can contain several traces from multiple vantage points. | Section 4 |
urn:ietf:params:qlog:file:sequential | Concrete log file schema containing a single trace, optimized for seqential read and write access. | Section 5 |
IANA is requested to create the "qlog event category URIs" registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/qlog for the purpose of registering event categories. It has the following format:¶
Event Category URI | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|
urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:gen#loglevel | Well-known logging levels for free-form text. | Section 9.1 |
urn:ietf:params:qlog:events:gen#sim | Events for simulation testing. | Section 9.2 |
16. References
16.1. Normative References
- [CDDL]
- Birkholz, H., Vigano, C., and C. Bormann, "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", RFC 8610, DOI 10.17487/RFC8610, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610>.
- [DNS-PRIVACY]
- Dickinson, S., Overeinder, B., van Rijswijk-Deij, R., and A. Mankin, "Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators", BCP 232, RFC 8932, DOI 10.17487/RFC8932, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8932>.
- [I-JSON]
- Bray, T., Ed., "The I-JSON Message Format", RFC 7493, DOI 10.17487/RFC7493, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7493>.
- [JSON]
- Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", STD 90, RFC 8259, DOI 10.17487/RFC8259, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8259>.
- [JSON-Text-Sequences]
- Williams, N., "JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Text Sequences", RFC 7464, DOI 10.17487/RFC7464, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7464>.
- [RFC2046]
- Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046, DOI 10.17487/RFC2046, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2046>.
- [RFC2119]
- Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
- [RFC3553]
- Mealling, M., Masinter, L., Hardie, T., and G. Klyne, "An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters", BCP 73, RFC 3553, DOI 10.17487/RFC3553, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3553>.
- [RFC3986]
- Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986>.
- [RFC6839]
- Hansen, T. and A. Melnikov, "Additional Media Type Structured Syntax Suffixes", RFC 6839, DOI 10.17487/RFC6839, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6839>.
- [RFC6973]
- Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J., Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, "Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols", RFC 6973, DOI 10.17487/RFC6973, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6973>.
- [RFC7464]
- Williams, N., "JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Text Sequences", RFC 7464, DOI 10.17487/RFC7464, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7464>.
- [RFC8091]
- Wilde, E., "A Media Type Structured Syntax Suffix for JSON Text Sequences", RFC 8091, DOI 10.17487/RFC8091, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8091>.
- [RFC8126]
- Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126>.
- [RFC8174]
- Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
- [RFC8259]
- Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", STD 90, RFC 8259, DOI 10.17487/RFC8259, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8259>.
- [RFC9000]
- Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000>.
16.2. Informative References
- [ANRW-2020]
- Marx, R., Piraux, M., Quax, P., and W. Lamotte, "Debugging QUIC and HTTP/3 with qlog and qvis", , <https://qlog.edm.uhasselt.be/anrw/>.
- [QLOG-H3]
- Marx, R., Niccolini, L., Seemann, M., and L. Pardue, "HTTP/3 qlog event definitions", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-quic-qlog-h3-events-07, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-qlog-h3-events-07>.
- [QLOG-QUIC]
- Marx, R., Niccolini, L., Seemann, M., and L. Pardue, "QUIC event definitions for qlog", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events-07, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events-07>.
- [RFC8446]
- Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446>.
- [RFC8546]
- Trammell, B. and M. Kuehlewind, "The Wire Image of a Network Protocol", RFC 8546, DOI 10.17487/RFC8546, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8546>.
Acknowledgements
Much of the initial work by Robin Marx was done at the Hasselt and KU Leuven Universities.¶
Thanks to Jana Iyengar, Brian Trammell, Dmitri Tikhonov, Stephen Petrides, Jari Arkko, Marcus Ihlar, Victor Vasiliev, Mirja Kuehlewind, Jeremy Laine, Kazu Yamamoto, Christian Huitema, Hugo Landau and Jonathan Lennox for their feedback and suggestions.¶
Change Log
This section is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.¶
Since draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-04:
- Updated RawInfo definition and guidance (#243)¶
Since draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-03:
- Added security and privacy considerations discussion (#252)¶
Since draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-02:
- No changes - new draft to prevent expiration¶
Since draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-01:
- Change the data definition language from TypeScript to CDDL (#143)¶
Since draft-marx-qlog-main-schema-01:
-
Decoupled qlog from the JSON format and described a mapping instead (#89)¶
- Data types are now specified in this document and proper definitions for fields were added in this format¶
- 64-bit numbers can now be either strings or numbers, with a preference for numbers (#10)¶
- binary blobs are now logged as lowercase hex strings (#39, #36)¶
- added guidance to add length-specifiers for binary blobs (#102)¶
- Removed "time_units" from Configuration. All times are now in ms instead (#95)¶
- Removed the "event_fields" setup for a more straightforward JSON format (#101,#89)¶
- Added a streaming option using the NDJSON format (#109,#2,#106)¶
- Described optional optimization options for implementers (#30)¶
- Added QLOGDIR and QLOGFILE environment variables, clarified the .well-known URL usage (#26,#33,#51)¶
- Overall tightened up the text and added more examples¶