| Internet-Draft | JSON for RPP | November 2026 |
| Wullink & Kowalik | Expires 6 May 2027 | [Page] |
- Workgroup:
- RESTful Provisioning Protocol
- Internet-Draft:
- draft-ietf-rpp-json-01
- Published:
- Intended Status:
- Standards Track
- Expires:
JSON for RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)
Abstract
This document defines the rules for representing the RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP) data objects using the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format. It specifies how RPP primitive types, common data types, Component Objects, Data Objects, and associations are mapped to JSON and JSON Schema, and provides normative JSON Schema definitions and examples for the RPP Data Objects, the representation of update requests, and an extension framework.¶
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 6 May 2027.¶
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
1. Introduction
The RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP) defines a set of data objects for managing registry resources, such as domain names, contacts, hosts, organisations, and users. The data model is defined in [I-D.ietf-rpp-data-objects] independently of any particular representation format. This document defines the JSON [RFC8259] representation of those data objects.¶
JSON has emerged as the de facto standard data format for modern RESTful APIs. Its widespread adoption across tools, libraries, and developer communities makes it well suited as the primary representation format for RPP. This document provides the normative rules and JSON Schema definitions required for implementations to produce and consume RPP messages in JSON.¶
The separation between the abstract data model and its concrete JSON representation ensures that the protocol's semantic foundation remains stable while enabling the adoption of JSON across diverse deployment environments.¶
1.1. Motivation
The RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP) introduces a new provisioning mechanism that aligns more closely with modern cloud infrastructure, enhancing the scalability of server deployments. While RESTful protocols do not mandate a specific media type for resource description, the widespread adoption of JSON in web services has established it as the de facto standard for modern APIs. The increasing availability of tools, software libraries, and a skilled workforce has led several registries to adopt JSON for data exchange within their API ecosystems. Registries supporting JSON can offer a unified API ecosystem that extends beyond domain name and IP address provisioning, maintaining a consistent technology stack, data formats, and developer experience.¶
JSON's syntax, known for its straightforwardness and minimal verbosity, significantly eases the tasks of writing, reading, and maintaining code. This simplicity is especially advantageous for the rapid comprehension and integration of provisioning APIs.¶
The lightweight nature of JSON can result in faster processing and data transfers, a critical aspect in high-volume transaction environments such as domain registration. Enhanced API response times can lead to more efficient domain lookups, registrations, and updates. JSON parsing is typically fast and well-supported by standard libraries, contributing to improved system performance amid frequent interactions between RPP clients and servers.¶
However, the absence of a standardised JSON format for domain provisioning has led to the emergence of TLD-specific implementations that lack interoperability, increasing the development effort required for integration. Similarly, at the registrar level, the absence of standards has resulted in numerous incompatible API implementations provided to clients and resellers. Standardising a JSON format for domain provisioning within the RPP framework could mitigate these challenges, reducing fragmentation and simplifying integration efforts across the domain registration industry.¶
2. Terminology
In this document, the following terminology is used.¶
Terms of the RPP data model, such as Data Object, Component Object, Process Object, Common Data Type, data element, cardinality, mutability, Identifier, Unique Identifier, Input Data Element, Parameter, Visibility, Direct Access, Input, Output, Reference, Owner Data Object, and This Object, are used as defined in [I-D.ietf-rpp-data-objects].¶
RPP Data Objects - The abstract data model definitions of the objects provisioned and exchanged with RPP, as specified in [I-D.ietf-rpp-data-objects].¶
RESTful Provisioning Protocol - A RESTful protocol for provisioning heterogeneous database objects.¶
JSON Schema - A vocabulary that allows annotation and validation of JSON documents, as described in [I-D.ietf-jsonschema-json-schema].¶
EPP Compatibility Profile - A set of additional constraints defined in [I-D.ietf-rpp-data-objects] that a server MUST adhere to when supporting both RPP and EPP concurrently.¶
3. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].¶
JSON is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, JSON specifications and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the character case presented. The examples in this document assume that request and response messages are properly formatted JSON documents. Indentation and white space in examples are provided only to illustrate element relationships and for improving readability, and are not REQUIRED features of the protocol.¶
All JSON Schema definitions in this document use JSON Schema draft 2020-12 [I-D.ietf-jsonschema-json-schema], and where not provided with a $schema keyword, the following default applies:¶
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"¶
4. JSON Representation Rules
This section defines the normative rules for representing the RPP data model in JSON. The data model defines all primitive types, common data types, component objects, resource objects, and associations independently of any concrete representation format. The rules in this section specify how those abstract definitions map to JSON and JSON Schema version 2020-12.¶
4.1. Primitive Type Mappings
RPP primitive types MUST be represented in JSON as follows:¶
| RPP Primitive Type | JSON Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| String |
string
|
Unicode character sequence |
| Integer |
number
|
Whole number, positive or negative |
| Boolean |
boolean
|
true or false
|
| Decimal |
string
|
Base-10 fractional value with exact representation within a defined precision. Number is encoded into string same as "number" in [RFC8259] without exponent part "ext". |
| Date |
string
|
Full-date as per [RFC3339], e.g. "2025-10-27"
|
| Timestamp |
string
|
Date-time in UTC as per [RFC3339], e.g. "2025-10-27T09:42:51Z"
|
| URL |
string
|
Uniform Resource Locator as per [RFC1738] |
| Binary |
string
|
Base64-encoded binary data |
4.2. Undefined Values
A data element can have no defined value, for example when the value is NULL in the server's database or has never been set. The JSON null value must not be used to represent an undefined value, a JSON Schema type such as "type": "string" does not allow null.¶
An undefined value of a primitive type data element must not be rendered, the property must be omitted from the JSON object. An array data element with cardinality 0+ that has no values may be rendered as an empty array ([]) or may be omitted from the JSON object. Consumers must treat both representations as equivalent.¶
Example: a domain name for which the primitive type data element expiryDate is undefined and not rendered, the array data element nameservers has no values, with nameservers rendered as an empty array:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"spClientId": "ClientX"
},
"nameservers": []
}
¶
The same domain name with the nameservers array omitted is equivalent:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"spClientId": "ClientX"
}
}
¶
4.3. Cardinality Rules
The cardinality of each data element in the RPP data model MUST be represented as follows in JSON:¶
A data element with cardinality 1 (exactly one) MUST be represented as a JSON property and MUST be present in the containing JSON object. The element MUST be listed under required in the corresponding JSON Schema.¶
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["name"]
}
¶
A data element with cardinality 0-1 (zero or one) MUST be represented as an optional JSON property. The element MUST NOT be listed under required in the corresponding JSON Schema. When absent, the element MUST be omitted from the JSON object (not represented as null).¶
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" }
}
}
¶
A data element with cardinality 0+ (zero or more) MUST be represented as an optional JSON array. When no values are present, the property MUST be omitted or represented as an empty array.¶
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/domainStatus.read" }
}
}
}
¶
A data element with cardinality 1+ (one or more) MUST be represented as a required JSON array with "minItems": 1 and the element MUST be listed under required in the corresponding JSON Schema.¶
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"records": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsRecord.read" },
"minItems": 1
}
},
"required": ["records"]
}
¶
4.4. Mutability Rules
Data elements in the RPP data model carry a mutability attribute: create-only, read-write, or read-only. Which of them an object representation contains follows from the Input and Output of the operation:¶
- Response content contains data elements of every mutability. A data element is left out only when it is not present on the object, when its Visibility is
onDemandand the client did not request it, or when authorisation or server policy withholds it.¶ - Request content for an object being created contains its
create-onlyandread-writedata elements. For a Component Object or an Aggregation object creation can take place in create or update operation on the containing object, when a value is set or added.¶ - Request content for an existing object being modified, i.e. when both the Reference and the Object of the Input are This Object, contains its
read-writedata elements.¶
Input Data Elements and Parameters are not data elements of the object, have no mutability, and are not subject to the following rules.¶
Data elements with mutability read-only MUST be annotated with "readOnly": true in the JSON Schema and MUST NOT be part of any request view.¶
{
"repositoryId": {
"type": "string",
"readOnly": true
}
}
¶
Data elements with mutability create-only MUST be annotated with "writeOnly": true in request schemas and MUST NOT be part of the update view.¶
Data elements with mutability read-write have no additional annotation.¶
A server MUST reject a request whose content contains a data element that is not allowed in that request, such as a read-only data element or a create-only data element of an existing object. With the enrichment required by Undeclared Properties, such a request fails JSON Schema validation.¶
4.5. Association Rules
The RPP data model defines several association types between objects, the following rules specify their JSON representations. An Aggregation represents a relationship between two independent objects, where one object references another. A Composition represents a parent-child relationship where the child object is embedded within the parent object and cannot exist independently.¶
4.5.1. Labelled Associations
Some associations between objects carry a string label that provides additional context for the relationship. The label is not an identifier of the target object, but rather a descriptor of the association itself. Labelled associations can occur in both aggregations and compositions. When representing labelled associations in JSON, the property label MUST be included alongside the reference to the target object. A property with the name object MUST be used to contain the reference to the target object, which can be either a limited representation containing at minimum the Unique Identifier of the target object for aggregations or an embedded object for compositions.¶
4.5.2. Aggregation
An Aggregation[Type] represents a relationship between two independent objects. The referenced object is identified by its Unique Identifier. When the cardinality allows more than one target, it MUST be represented as a JSON array. Each element of the array is a limited representation of the referenced object, as specified below.¶
Aggregation[Type] with cardinality 0+ or 1+ MUST be represented as a JSON array of embedded objects. Each object in the array MUST include the data elements of the referenced object type that are relevant to the context (at minimum the Unique Identifier). Other data elements of the referenced object type MAY be included as needed to provide additional context for the client, but are not required. The JSON Schema MUST allow for the presence of these additional fields.¶
Example: domain nameservers (Aggregation[Host Data Object]) in a read response, returning a limited object representation containing only the Unique Identifier hostName:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "name.example",
"nameservers": [
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns1.name.example" },
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns2.name.example" }
]
}
¶
4.5.3. Composition
A Type represents a parent-child relationship where the child's lifecycle is bound to the parent and the child cannot exist independently of the parent. In JSON, the child object MUST be fully embedded within the parent object.¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "name.example",
"nameservers": [
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.name.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "NS1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX"
},
"status": [ { "@type": "hostStatus", "label": "ok" } ],
"dns": {
"@type": "dnsData",
"records": [
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "@",
"type": "ns",
"rdata": { "nsdname": "ns1.name.example." }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.name.example.",
"type": "a",
"rdata": { "address": "192.0.2.1" }
}
]
}
}
]
}
¶
4.5.4. Labelled Aggregation
A LabelledAggregation[Type] is a relationship between two independent objects where each association carries a string label. Multiple associations with the same label are allowed.¶
LabelledAggregation[Type] with cardinality 0+ MUST be represented as a JSON array of objects. Each object in the array MUST contain a label property (string) alongside the identifier of the referenced object. The object MUST include at least the Unique Identifier of the referenced object type. Other data elements of the referenced object type MAY be included as needed to provide additional context for the client, but are not required. The JSON Schema MUST allow for the presence of these additional fields.¶
Example: domain contacts (LabelledAggregation[Contact Object]):¶
"contacts": [
{
"label": "admin",
"object": {
"@type": "contact",
"id": "ABC-8013"
}
},
{
"label": "tech",
"object": {
"@type": "contact",
"id": "ABC-8014"
}
}
]
¶
4.5.5. Dictionary Aggregation
A DictionaryAggregation[Type] is a relationship between two independent objects where each association carries a unique string label that serves as a dictionary key.¶
DictionaryAggregation[Type] MUST be represented as a JSON object where each key is the unique label and the corresponding value is the referenced object, the object MUST include at least the Unique Identifier of the referenced object type. Other data elements of the referenced object type MAY be included as needed to provide additional context for the client, but are not required. The JSON Schema MUST allow for the presence of these additional fields.¶
Example: domain contacts keyed by unique role (DictionaryAggregation[Contact Object]):¶
"contacts": {
"admin": {
"@type": "contact",
"id": "ABC-8013"
},
"tech": {
"@type": "contact",
"id": "ABC-8014"
}
}
¶
4.5.6. Labelled Composition
A LabelledComposition[Type] is a parent-child relationship where each embedded child carries a string label. Multiple instances with the same label are allowed.¶
LabelledComposition[Type] with cardinality 0+ MUST be represented as a JSON array of embedded objects. Each object in the array MUST contain a label property alongside the data elements of the composed type.¶
Example: remarks (LabelledComposition[Remark Object]):¶
"remarks": [
{
"label": "public",
"object": {
"@type": "remark",
"description": "This domain is used for test purposes."
}
},
{
"label": "private",
"object": {
"@type": "remark",
"description": "Internal note for the sponsoring client."
}
}
]
¶
4.5.7. Dictionary Composition
A DictionaryComposition[Type] is a parent-child relationship where each embedded child carries a unique string label used as a dictionary key.¶
DictionaryComposition[Type] MUST be represented as a JSON object where each key is the unique label and the corresponding value is the fully embedded child object.¶
Example: remarks keyed by scope (DictionaryComposition[Remark Object]):¶
"remarks": {
"public": {
"@type": "remark",
"description": "This domain is used for test purposes."
},
"private": {
"@type": "remark",
"description": "Internal note for the sponsoring client."
}
}
¶
4.6. Object Identifier Rules
When a resource or component object is referenced by identifier (for example in an aggregation), the identifier MUST be represented as a JSON string using the value of the object's primary identifier data element.¶
When a resource or component object is embedded (as in a composition), all data elements of the object MUST be represented as properties of a JSON object according to the rules of this section.¶
4.7. External Type Embedding Rules
RPP data objects may include data elements whose types are defined by external specifications (e.g., JSContact in [RFC9553]). When embedding a value of an externally defined type into a JSON representation, the following rules apply, in order of preference:¶
If the external type has a native JSON representation (i.e., the external specification defines how the type is represented using the JSON format), the value MUST be embedded as a valid JSON element using the native JSON representation defined by that specification.¶
If the external type does not have a native JSON representation but has a native UTF-8 encoded text representation, the value MUST be embedded as a JSON string using the UTF-8 encoding.¶
If the external type has neither a native JSON nor a native UTF-8 text representation, the binary representation of the value MUST be Base64-encoded ([RFC4648], Section 4) and embedded as a JSON string.¶
4.8. Process Data Embedding Rules
As defined in [I-D.ietf-rpp-core], a uniform interface operation MAY require process data in addition to the object representation data. This section defines how such process data MUST be represented in JSON when transmitted together with the object representation in a single request body.¶
Process data accompanying a uniform interface operation MUST be represented using the processes data element of the owning resource object (see Processes Object), following the Aggregation rules for the corresponding process type (for example createProcess for creation-specific inputs). Each embedded process object MUST be a valid JSON representation of the process object. This applies uniformly regardless of whether the resource object already exists.¶
Example: a domain create request body carrying a two-year registration period as process data embedded in a createProcess process object under processes:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"nameservers": [
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns1.example.example" },
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns2.example.example" }
],
"processes": {
"@type": "processes",
"createProcess": [
{
"@type": "createProcess",
"period": {
"@type": "period",
"value": 2,
"unit": "y"
}
}
]
}
}
¶
4.9. JSON Schema Definition Rules
Each RPP component object and resource object MUST have a corresponding JSON Schema definition. Object definitions MUST be placed in the $defs keyword of the JSON Schema document.¶
Identifier fields MUST use "type": "string" in JSON Schema.¶
Enumeration constraints on string fields MUST be expressed using the "enum" keyword in JSON Schema.¶
Example (Transfer Status enum):¶
"trStatus": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["pending", "clientApproved", "clientCancelled",
"clientRejected", "serverApproved", "serverCancelled"]
}
¶
Each JSON Schema definition for an RPP object MUST include a "required" array listing all data elements with cardinality 1 or 1+.¶
4.9.1. Undeclared Properties
JSON Schema definitions for extendible RPP objects MUST NOT use "additionalProperties": false or "unevaluatedProperties": false. However, before validation, schemas on every property level MUST be enriched with "unevaluatedProperties": false property to prevent the presence of undeclared properties in JSON instances. JSON Schemas for Object type MAY use "additionalProperties": true to allow for free key definition.¶
4.9.2. Type Property
Every RPP object representation MUST include a "@type" property whose value is the object's identifier as registered in the IANA RPP Data Object Registry. This property enables identification and allows clients and servers to unambiguously determine the type of an object. The "@type" property MUST be included in the JSON Schema "properties" object for each RPP object definition with a "const" constraint fixing the value to the object's registered identifier. The "@type" property MUST be listed in the "required" array of the corresponding JSON Schema definition.¶
Example (Domain Name Data Object):¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example"
}
¶
4.10. JSON Schema Composition Rules
The JSON Schema definitions of all RPP objects MUST be located in a single shared $defs object at the top level of the RPP schema document. A schema that refers to another definition MUST use the $ref keyword with a JSON Pointer fragment to the definition in the shared $defs object.¶
The key of a definition in the shared $defs object MUST be formed as follows, using the Identifiers of the data model unchanged:¶
- Data Object, Process Object, or Component Object: its Identifier, followed by a
.and the name of the view. An object that extends another object uses its own Identifier, not the Identifier of the object it extends.¶
The view names are:¶
-
create: the request content of the Create operation.¶ -
read: the object representation returned in responses.¶ -
update: the request content of the Update operation.¶ -
reference: the limited representation of an aggregated object (see Aggregation), containing@typeand the object's Unique Identifier.¶ -
query: the response content of the Query operation, typically an array ofreadviews.¶ - The Identifier of the operation: the request content of any other operation.¶
- The Identifier of the operation followed by
.output: the response content of an operation, other than Read and Query, whose output is not an existing view of the object.¶
A Component Object has a read view. A Component Object that has at least one data element with mutability create-only or read-write also has a create view. A Component Object has no other views.¶
A view that holds request content MUST reference the create view of an embedded Component Object. A view that holds response content MUST reference the read view of an embedded Component Object.¶
Each key MUST be unique within the shared $defs object. Common Data Types and types defined by an external specification are not subject to this rule. They MAY use a key that is not derived from an RPP Identifier.¶
A schema that refers to another component object or data object MUST use the $ref keyword with a JSON Pointer fragment to the definition in the shared $defs object, for example { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.create" }.¶
The final RPP schema document, containing the shared $defs object with all sub-schemas, MUST have an $id keyword whose value is an absolute URI without a fragment, serving as the stable identifier of the complete RPP schema document.¶
Example (structure of the final RPP schema document):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$id": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:schema:json-1.0",
"$defs": {
"period.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "period" },
"value": { "type": "integer" },
"unit": { "type": "string", "enum": ["y", "m"] }
},
"required": ["@type", "value", "unit"]
},
"domainCreateProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainCreateProcess" },
"period": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.create" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
4.10.1. Status Objects
Each status object has a status values table whose "Set By" column identifies the entity that adds and removes each status value: client, server, or client, server. In this section, a client-settable status value is a value whose "Set By" column contains client.¶
The read view of a status object lists all of its status values in the "enum" of "label". Its create view lists only the client-settable status values in the "enum" of "label".¶
When a status object has no client-settable status value, the create and update views of the Data Object MUST NOT contain the status data element.¶
When the status values of a status object state that a client is not required to provide a status value when creating or updating the object, the status data element MUST NOT be listed under "required" and MUST NOT carry "minItems" in the create and update views, notwithstanding Cardinality Rules and JSON Schema Definition Rules.¶
When the status values of a status object state that a server MUST assign at least one status value to the object, the status data element MUST be listed under "required" in the read view, with "minItems": 1 when it is an array.¶
4.10.2. Inheritance
RPP Data Objects and Component Objects MAY inherit the data elements and operations of another object. The JSON Schema for an object must include all the inherited data elements and constraints from its base object, using a flat structure where all properties are defined at the top level of the schema, rather than nested under an "allOf" or "anyOf" construct.¶
Example: a Shape Object with the data elements name (cardinality 1) and colour (cardinality 0-1), and a Circle Object that extends it with the additional data element radius (cardinality 1).¶
JSON Schema of the base Shape Object:¶
{
"$defs": {
"shape": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "shape" },
"name": { "type": "string" },
"colour": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["@type", "name"]
}
}
}
¶
JSON Schema of the Circle Object, which defines the inherited name and colour properties at the top level alongside its own radius property, without referencing the Shape Object schema using "allOf":¶
{
"$defs": {
"circle": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "circle" },
"name": { "type": "string" },
"colour": { "type": "string" },
"radius": { "type": "integer" }
},
"required": ["@type", "name", "radius"]
}
}
}
¶
Example Circle Object instance:¶
{
"@type": "circle",
"name": "my-circle",
"colour": "red",
"radius": 10
}
¶
4.10.3. RPP Profiles and Validation
RPP profiles, such as the EPP Compatibility Profile, may impose additional constraints on top of the base RPP data model. These additional constraints MUST be enforced by implementations through validation rules that go beyond what can be expressed in JSON Schema. Such validation rules MUST be clearly documented in the profile specification and implemented by both clients and servers when operating under that profile. For example, the EPP Compatibility Profile requires that certain fields be present in specific object types, and that certain identifier fields conform to EPP syntax rules. These constraints cannot be fully captured in JSON Schema and therefore require additional validation logic in implementations.¶
5. Update Rules
JSON representations for update operations follow specific rules to ensure consistency and correctness. There are two types of update operations: full updates and partial updates.¶
5.1. Full
A full update operation replaces the entire state of a resource object with the new representation provided in the request, all required properties MUST be included in the new representation.¶
5.2. Partial
A partial update operation allows clients to update specific properties of a resource object, while leaving other properties unchanged.
A partial update MUST use JSON Patch [RFC6902], extended with a match property for matching array elements. The match property is not part of [RFC6902]; it is introduced and defined in this document (see Section 5.2.1).¶
The request body of a partial update is a JSON array of patch operations, see Section 5.3. Each patch operation consists of an op (the operation), a path (a JSON Pointer to the property the operation targets), a value (the new value, for add and replace), and optionally a match (to select array elements). When the path points to an existing primitive type property, the add operation has the same semantics as replace and will overwrite the existing value.¶
5.2.1. Matching
The match property is used to identify elements in an array of objects. It is a JSON object that contains key-value pairs corresponding to the properties of the array elements. The server uses the match property to locate the elements in the array that should be removed or replaced. The match property MUST NOT be used when the path does not point to an array, and MUST NOT be used for an array of primitive types. An array of primitive types is changed by replacing the array as a whole, or by adding a value without match.¶
The following rules apply to matching and depend on the type of the property in the match object:¶
- A primitive type property (e.g. string, number or boolean) matches if the target object property has the same type and the same value.¶
- An array of primitive type property (e.g. array of string, number or boolean) matches if the target array contains elements of the same type and both sets of values are identical. The ordering of elements does not affect matching.¶
- An object type is considered a match when the value of every property in the
matchobject matches the value of the property with the same name in the target object. Properties of the target object that are not named in thematchobject are not compared.¶ - The server MUST NOT match nested data structures. The
matchproperty is only used for matching elements in the immediate array specified by thepathproperty of the JSON Patch operation.¶ - The server MUST reject a
matchthat is not a JSON object, or that contains a value that cannot be compared using the rules above.¶
Example domain object for matching an array element with a specific key-value pair:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "REG-100" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "REG-200" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "REG-300" } }
]
}
¶
Example match object for matching the array element with the "tech" label and the contact ID "REG-200" in the contacts array of the domain object above:¶
{
"match": {
"label": "tech",
"object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "REG-200" }
}
}
¶
Example object for matching an array element that has a property containing an array of primitive types, here the tld property of the elements of the idnLgr array:¶
{
"@type": "discovery",
"idnLgr": [
{
"@type": "discoveryIdnLgr",
"tld": ["example", "org"],
"name": "example-latn-1.0"
},
{
"@type": "discoveryIdnLgr",
"tld": ["example"],
"name": "example-cyrl-1.0"
}
]
}
¶
Example match object for matching the elements of the idnLgr array above for which the tld array contains the value "org" and "example". The order of the values in tld is ignored and only the first element matches, because the second element does not contain "org":¶
{
"match": {
"tld": ["org", "example"]
}
}
¶
5.2.2. Processing Steps
The server MUST process the patch operations in the order in which they appear in the request body. A partial update is atomic, meaning that if any of the operations fails or is rejected, the server MUST reject the complete request with an appropriate error response that identifies the patch operation that failed.¶
For each patch operation the server MUST perform the following steps. Figure 1 shows the steps for a single patch operation, Figure 2 shows the handling of a primitive type value or an object, and Figure 3 shows the handling of an array.¶
- Check the operation: the
opmust be one of "add", "remove" or "replace". JSON Patch operations other than these are not allowed.¶ - Resolve the path: the
pathmust point to an existing property in the JSON object or a non-existing but allowed property defined in the JSON Schema of the object.¶ -
Determine the type of the target that the
pathpoints to:¶ -
Apply the operation to a primitive type value or an object:¶
- For "remove", the field is removed.¶
-
For "add" and "replace", the
valueproperty must be present.¶- If the target is a primitive type value, the type of
valuemust match the type of the target field.¶ - If the target is an object,
valuemust be a valid object, the@typeproperty ofvaluemust match the@typeproperty of the target object or be a supertype of the target object's@type.¶ - The field is then set to
value.¶
- If the target is a primitive type value, the type of
-
Apply the operation to an array:¶
-
If
matchis present, the operation targets the elements identified bymatch:¶- The "add" operation is not allowed to be used together with
match.¶ - If no element matches, the operation fails.¶
- For "remove", all matching elements are removed from the array.¶
- For "replace", if more than one element matches, the operation is ambiguous and fails. If exactly one element matches, it is replaced by
value.¶
- The "add" operation is not allowed to be used together with
-
If
matchis absent, the operation targets the array property as a whole:¶
-
- After the last operation has been applied, the resulting resource object must satisfy the JSON Schema and the constraints of the resource object that cannot be enforced by the JSON Schema.¶
If a step fails because no element matches, the server MUST return an error response indicating that the specified element could not be found.¶
+-------------------------------+
| Take next patch operation |<-------------------+
+---------------+---------------+ |
| |
v |
+-------------------------------+ |
| Is op "add", "remove" or |--- no --> REJECT |
| "replace"? | |
+---------------+---------------+ |
| yes |
v |
+-------------------------------+ |
| Does path point to an |--- no --> REJECT |
| existing field or element? | |
+---------------+---------------+ |
| yes |
v |
+-------------------------------+ |
| Does path point to an array? | |
+-------+---------------+-------+ |
| no | yes |
v v |
+---------------+ +---------------+ |
| Simple value | | Array | |
| or object | | (figure 3) | |
| (figure 2) | | | |
+-------+-------+ +-------+-------+ |
| | |
+--------+--------+ |
| |
v |
+-------------------------------+ |
| Another patch operation? |--- yes ------------+
+---------------+---------------+
| no
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is the resulting object valid |--- no --> REJECT
| for the JSON Schema and the |
| constraints? |
+---------------+---------------+
| yes
v
Apply all changes
+-------------------------------+
| Is match present? |--- yes -> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| no
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is op "remove"? |--- yes --> Remove the field
+---------------+---------------+
| no ("add" or "replace")
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is value present? |--- no ---> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| yes
|
v
+---------------+
| Simple value |
| and same type | --- yes ---> Set the field to value
| |
+-------+-------+
| no
|
v
+---------------+
| Object and |
| @type matches | --- yes ---> Set the field to value
| |
+-------+-------+
|
| no
v
REJECT
+-------------------------------+
| Is match present? |--- yes --> continue at (B)
+---------------+---------------+
| no
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is op "add"? |--- yes --> Append value as
+---------------+---------------+ a new element
| no
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is op "remove"? |--- yes --> Remove the property
+---------------+---------------+ (REJECT if the property
has cardinality 1+)
| no ("replace")
v
+-------------------------------+
| Does value violate the schema |
| of the array elements? |--- yes --> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| no
v
Replace the array with value
(B) Match present: the matching elements are targeted
+-------------------------------+
| Is op "add"? |--- yes --> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| no
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is match a JSON object whose |
| values can be compared? |--- no ---> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| yes
v
+-------------------------------+
| Does any element match? |--- no ---> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| yes
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is op "remove"? |--- yes --> Remove all
+---------------+---------------+ matching elements
| no ("replace")
v
+-------------------------------+
| Does more than one element |
| match? |--- yes --> REJECT (ambiguous)
+---------------+---------------+
| no
v
+-------------------------------+
| Is value valid for the |
| element type? |--- no ---> REJECT
+---------------+---------------+
| yes
v
Replace the element with value
5.3. Schema
A partial update request body MUST be a JSON array of patch operation objects. Each operation MUST include an op and a path property. The value property MUST be present for add and replace operations. The match property MAY be present when the path points to an array property, to identify the array elements to operate on. When match is absent, the operation targets the array property as a whole (see step 5 in Section 5.2.2).¶
The value property is intentionally left unconstrained ({}) in the JSON Schema below, since the JSON type it MUST hold depends on the target path: it can be a JSON object (e.g. when replacing a single object property or a single matched array element), a JSON array (e.g. when replacing an array property as a whole), or a primitive type such as a string, number, or boolean.¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/partialUpdate",
"$defs": {
"partialUpdate": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/patchOperation" },
"minItems": 1
},
"patchOperation": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/patchAdd" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/patchRemove" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/patchReplace" }
]
},
"patchAdd": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"op": { "type": "string", "const": "add" },
"path": { "type": "string" },
"value": {}
},
"required": ["op", "path", "value"],
"additionalProperties": false
},
"patchRemove": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"op": { "type": "string", "const": "remove" },
"path": { "type": "string" },
"match": { "type": "object" }
},
"required": ["op", "path"],
"additionalProperties": false
},
"patchReplace": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"op": { "type": "string", "const": "replace" },
"path": { "type": "string" },
"match": { "type": "object" },
"value": {}
},
"required": ["op", "path", "value"],
"additionalProperties": false
}
}
}
¶
5.3.1. Examples
Example JSON document used by partial update examples below:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "EXAMPLE1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
},
"nameservers": [
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns1.example.example" },
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns2.example.example" }
],
"registrant": { "@type": "contact", "id": "JD-1234" },
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" } }
],
"status": [
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"expiryDate": "2027-01-01T00:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
Example of a partial update request to change the registrant of a domain name from "JD-1234" to "JD-1235":¶
[
{
"op": "replace",
"path": "/registrant",
"value": {
"@type": "contact",
"id": "JD-1235"
}
}
]
¶
Example of a partial update request to change the status of a domain name from "ok" to "clientUpdateProhibited":¶
[
{
"op": "replace",
"path": "/status",
"match": {
"label": "ok"
},
"value": {
"@type": "domainStatus",
"label": "clientUpdateProhibited"
}
}
]
¶
Example of a partial update request for adding an additional tech contact to a domain name:¶
[
{
"op": "add",
"path": "/contacts",
"value": {
"label": "tech",
"object": {
"@type": "contact",
"id": "SH-8014"
}
}
}
]
¶
Example of a partial update request replacing the entire nameservers array of a domain name in a single operation, with no "match" property present:¶
[
{
"op": "replace",
"path": "/nameservers",
"value": [
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns1.example.example" },
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns3.example.example" }
]
}
]
¶
6. JSON Schema Definitions
This section provides normative JSON Schema definitions for RPP component objects and resource objects. All schemas use JSON Schema draft 2020-12 [I-D.ietf-jsonschema-json-schema].¶
6.1. Common Data Types Schemas
This section defines shared data types that are based on the primitive data types above and are reused across multiple data object definitions.¶
6.1.1. Identifier
Identifiers are character strings with a specified minimum length, a specified maximum length, and a specified format outlined in Section 2.8 of [RFC5730]. Identifiers for certain object types MAY have additional constraints imposed either by server policy, object-specific specifications, or both.¶
In JSON, an Identifier MUST be represented as a string value conforming to the roidType syntax defined in Section 2.8 of [RFC5730]: one to eight word characters optionally preceded by an underscore, followed by a hyphen and one or more word characters, with a maximum total length of 89 characters.¶
{
"$defs": {
"identifier": {
"type": "string",
"pattern": "^(\\w|_){1,8}-\\w{1,}$",
"maxLength": 89
}
}
}
¶
6.1.2. Client Identifier
Client identifiers are character strings with a specified minimum length, a specified maximum length, and a specified format. Client identifiers use the clIDType syntax described in [RFC5730].¶
In JSON, a Client Identifier MUST be represented as a string value.¶
{
"$defs": {
"clientIdentifier": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 3,
"maxLength": 16,
"pattern": "^\\S+( \\S+)*$"
}
}
}
¶
6.1.3. Phone Number
Telephone number syntax is derived from structures defined in [ITU.E164.2005]. Telephone numbers described in this specification are character strings that MUST begin with a plus sign ("+", ASCII value 0x002B), followed by a country code defined in [ITU.E164.2005], followed by a dot (".", ASCII value 0x002E), followed by a sequence of digits representing the telephone number. An optional "x" (ASCII value 0x0078) separator with additional digits representing extension information can be appended to the end of the value.¶
In JSON, a Phone Number MUST be represented as a string value conforming to the pattern described above.¶
{
"$defs": {
"phoneNumber": { "type": "string", "pattern": "^\\+[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,14}(x[0-9]+)?$" }
}
}
¶
6.2. Component Objects Schemas
6.2.1. Period Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"period.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "period", "readOnly": true },
"value": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1, "maximum": 99 },
"unit": { "type": "string", "enum": ["y", "m"] }
},
"required": ["@type", "value", "unit"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"period.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "period" },
"value": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1, "maximum": 99 },
"unit": { "type": "string", "enum": ["y", "m"] }
},
"required": ["@type", "value", "unit"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.2. Provisioning Metadata Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
upClientIdandupDateMUST NOT be present if the object has never been modified.¶ -
trDateMUST NOT be present if the object has never been transferred.¶ - In the EPP Compatibility Profile,
repositoryIdMUST be provided.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"provMetadata.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "provMetadata", "readOnly": true },
"repositoryId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "readOnly": true },
"spClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"crClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"crDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"upClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"upDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"trDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "spClientId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.3. Status Objects
Each RPP Data Object type that carries a status uses a type-specific status object. The create view of a status object holds only the status values that a client can set (see Section 4.10.1).¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
- A server MUST keep the status values it has set when it processes a create or update request; their absence from the
"status"of the request does not remove them. A server MAY alter or override client-settable status values, subject to local server policy.¶ - A server MUST reject a request whose
"status"array contains a combination of label values prohibited by the status exclusion rules for that object type.¶ - A
"status"array MUST NOT contain the same"label"value more than once.¶
Extensions MAY define additional "label" values for a status object; such values are added to the "enum" of the corresponding status object in the effective schema, as described in Section 7.¶
6.2.3.1. Domain Name Status Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
"due": Servers MAY restrict the ability of clients to set or update this value.¶ - Label values with the prefix
"rgp"MUST only appear when the server supports the Redemption Grace Period (RGP) for the domain name.¶ - The labels
"rgpRedemptionPeriod","rgpPendingRestore", and"rgpPendingDelete"MUST only appear together with the"pendingDelete"label.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"domainStatus.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainStatus", "readOnly": true },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"clientDeleteProhibited",
"serverDeleteProhibited",
"clientHold",
"serverHold",
"clientRenewProhibited",
"serverRenewProhibited",
"clientTransferProhibited",
"serverTransferProhibited",
"clientUpdateProhibited",
"serverUpdateProhibited",
"inactive",
"ok",
"pendingCreate",
"pendingDelete",
"pendingRenew",
"pendingTransfer",
"pendingUpdate",
"rgpAddPeriod",
"rgpAutoRenewPeriod",
"rgpRenewPeriod",
"rgpTransferPeriod",
"rgpRedemptionPeriod",
"rgpPendingRestore",
"rgpPendingDelete"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"due": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema (status values that a client can set):¶
{
"$defs": {
"domainStatus.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainStatus" },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"clientDeleteProhibited",
"clientHold",
"clientRenewProhibited",
"clientTransferProhibited",
"clientUpdateProhibited"
],
"writeOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true },
"due": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.3.2. Host Status Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"hostStatus.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "hostStatus", "readOnly": true },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"clientDeleteProhibited",
"serverDeleteProhibited",
"clientUpdateProhibited",
"serverUpdateProhibited",
"linked",
"ok",
"pendingCreate",
"pendingDelete",
"pendingTransfer",
"pendingUpdate"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema (status values that a client can set):¶
{
"$defs": {
"hostStatus.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "hostStatus" },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["clientDeleteProhibited", "clientUpdateProhibited"],
"writeOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.3.3. Contact Status Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"contactStatus.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contactStatus", "readOnly": true },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"clientDeleteProhibited",
"serverDeleteProhibited",
"clientTransferProhibited",
"serverTransferProhibited",
"clientUpdateProhibited",
"serverUpdateProhibited",
"linked",
"ok",
"pendingCreate",
"pendingDelete",
"pendingTransfer",
"pendingUpdate"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema (status values that a client can set):¶
{
"$defs": {
"contactStatus.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contactStatus" },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["clientDeleteProhibited", "clientTransferProhibited", "clientUpdateProhibited"],
"writeOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.3.4. Organisation Role Status Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"organisationRoleStatus.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisationRoleStatus", "readOnly": true },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["clientLinkProhibited", "serverLinkProhibited", "linked", "ok"],
"readOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema (status values that a client can set):¶
{
"$defs": {
"organisationRoleStatus.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisationRoleStatus" },
"label": { "type": "string", "enum": ["clientLinkProhibited"], "writeOnly": true },
"reason": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.3.5. Organisation Status Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
- The
"hold"and"terminated"labels are server-managed when the organisation has no parent organisation; otherwise they MAY be client-managed, subject to server policy.¶ - The
"status"array MUST contain exactly one of the labels"pendingCreate","ok","hold", or"terminated".¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"organisationStatus.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisationStatus", "readOnly": true },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"ok",
"hold",
"terminated",
"linked",
"clientLinkProhibited",
"serverLinkProhibited",
"clientUpdateProhibited",
"serverUpdateProhibited",
"clientDeleteProhibited",
"serverDeleteProhibited",
"pendingCreate",
"pendingUpdate",
"pendingDelete"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema (status values that a client can set):¶
{
"$defs": {
"organisationStatus.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisationStatus" },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"hold",
"terminated",
"clientLinkProhibited",
"clientUpdateProhibited",
"clientDeleteProhibited"
],
"writeOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.3.6. User Status Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
- The
"pending"label is server-managed;"suspended"and"deactivated"are server-managed and MAY additionally be client-managed by a client with permission to manage users.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"userStatus.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "userStatus", "readOnly": true },
"label": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["active", "pending", "suspended", "deactivated"],
"readOnly": true
},
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema (status values that a client can set):¶
{
"$defs": {
"userStatus.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "userStatus" },
"label": { "type": "string", "enum": ["suspended", "deactivated"], "writeOnly": true },
"reason": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "label"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.4. DNS Resource Record Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
nameMUST be a syntactically valid DNS host name in zone file string representation. Both absolute FQDNs (with trailing dot) and relative host names are allowed, as well as the@symbol representing the domain name itself.¶ -
typeMUST be a valid string representation of a DNS resource record type as defined in [RFC1035]. Values MUST be converted to lowercase. Allowed values MAY be further constrained by server policy.¶ - In the EPP Compatibility Profile ([RFC5732]), the following record types MUST be supported:
ns,a, andaaaa. With DNSSEC Extension [RFC5910],dsanddnskeyMUST additionally be supported.¶ -
class, if present, MUST be chosen from Section 3.2.4 (CLASS values) of [RFC1035]. A client SHOULD omit this element; the server MUST assumeINas the default.¶ - The fields within
rdataMUST match the expected structure for the given record type (see RDATA structures below).¶
RDATA structures required in the EPP Compatibility Profile:¶
- NS records ([RFC1035], Section 3.3.11):
nsdname¶ - A records ([RFC1035], Section 3.4.1):
address¶ - AAAA records ([RFC3596], Section 2.2):
address¶ - DS records ([RFC4034], Section 5, with DNSSEC Extension):
keyTag,algorithm,digestType,digest¶ - DNSKEY records ([RFC4034], Section 2, with DNSSEC Extension):
flags,protocol,algorithm,publicKey¶
All rdata property names MUST be written in camelCase and all values MUST use the string data type.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"dnsRecord.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "dnsRecord", "readOnly": true },
"name": { "type": "string" },
"class": { "type": "string" },
"type": { "type": "string" },
"rdata": { "type": "object", "unevaluatedProperties": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "name", "type", "rdata"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"dnsRecord.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "dnsRecord" },
"name": { "type": "string" },
"class": { "type": "string" },
"type": { "type": "string" },
"rdata": { "type": "object", "unevaluatedProperties": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "name", "type", "rdata"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.5. DNS Operational Controls Object
The DNS Operational Controls Object contains operational control parameters that a client MAY use to influence server-side DNS behaviour for a set of DNS records. A server MAY ignore these values, e.g. for policy reasons. This structure is aligned with [I-D.simmen-rpp-dns-data].¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"dnsControls.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "dnsControls", "readOnly": true },
"ttl": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
"propertyNames": { "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" }
},
"maxSigLifetime": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
"propertyNames": { "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" }
}
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"dnsControls.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "dnsControls" },
"ttl": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
"propertyNames": { "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" }
},
"maxSigLifetime": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
"propertyNames": { "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$" }
}
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.6. DNS Data Object
The DNS Data Object is a container for DNS resource records and associated operational controls for a provisioned object. This structure groups DNS records together with control parameters that influence server-side DNS behaviour. It is aligned with [I-D.simmen-rpp-dns-data].¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
- In the EPP Compatibility Profile with DNSSEC Extension [RFC5910], records of type
dsanddnskeyMUST be supported in addition tons,a, andaaaa. A server MUST support eitherdsordnskeyor both. If provided with onlydnskey, a server MUST calculate the DS record.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"dnsData.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "dnsData", "readOnly": true },
"records": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsRecord.read" }
},
"controls": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsControls.read" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"dnsData.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "dnsData" },
"records": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsRecord.create" }
},
"controls": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsControls.create" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.8. Disclose Object
The Disclose Object is used by the disclose data element of the Contact Data Object.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"disclose.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "disclose", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.9. JSContact Card Object
The Contact Data Object uses version 2.0 of JSContact [RFC9982] to represent contact information. The Contact object is defined below according to the RPP JSContact Profile [TODO Add Ref].¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
addresses[*].countryCodeMUST be a valid two-character ISO 3166-1 [ISO3166-1] alpha-2 code when present.¶ -
localizationsMUST be fully expanded; nested PatchObject-style keys (e.g.,"addresses/addr/full") are NOT allowed.¶ - When
phones[*].featuresis absent, the number MUST be treated as a voice number.¶
{
"$defs": {
"Card": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "Card" },
"version": { "type": "string", "const": "2.0" },
"kind": { "type": "string", "enum": ["individual", "org"] },
"language": { "type": "string" },
"name": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"full": { "type": "string" }
}
},
"organizations": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" }
}
}
},
"addresses": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"full": { "type": "string" },
"countryCode": { "type": "string", "pattern": "^[A-Z]{2}$" },
"components": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"kind": { "type": "string", "enum": ["name", "locality", "region", "postcode"] },
"value": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["kind", "value"]
}
}
}
}
},
"phones": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"number": { "type": "string" },
"features": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "boolean"
}
}
},
"required": ["number"]
}
},
"emails": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"address": { "type": "string", "format": "email" }
},
"required": ["address"]
}
},
"links": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"uri": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" },
"kind": { "type": "string", "const": "contact" }
},
"required": ["uri"]
}
},
"localizations": { "type": "object" }
},
"required": ["@type", "version"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.10. Restore Report Object
The Restore Report Object contains the redemption grace period restore report submitted by the sponsoring client as required by the RGP process ([RFC3915]).¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
- At least one and at most two
statementsMUST be provided.¶ -
restoreTimeMAY be omitted when the restore report is submitted inline within the restore request in a single-step process.¶ - In the EPP Compatibility Profile,
restoreTimeMUST be present as defined in [RFC3915].¶ - In the EPP Compatibility Profile, exactly two
statementsMUST be present as defined in [RFC3915].¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"restoreReport.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "restoreReport", "readOnly": true },
"preData": { "type": "string" },
"postData": { "type": "string" },
"deleteTime": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
"restoreTime": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
"restoreReason": { "type": "string" },
"statements": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"minItems": 1,
"maxItems": 2
},
"other": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["@type", "statements"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"restoreReport.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "restoreReport" },
"preData": { "type": "string" },
"postData": { "type": "string" },
"deleteTime": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
"restoreTime": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
"restoreReason": { "type": "string" },
"statements": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"minItems": 1,
"maxItems": 2
},
"other": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["@type", "statements"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.11. Organisation Role Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
typeMUST only use values registered in the IANA "EPP Organization Role Values" registry ([RFC8543]).¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"organisationRole.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisationRole", "readOnly": true },
"roleId": { "type": "string" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationRoleStatus.read" }
}
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Create schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"organisationRole.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisationRole" },
"roleId": { "type": "string" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationRoleStatus.create" }
}
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.12. Extension Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
versionMUST use the Semantic Versioning format.¶ -
urlMUST be a valid URL and accessible to the client.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"extension.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "extension", "readOnly": true },
"name": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"id": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"version": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"url": { "type": "string", "format": "uri", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "name", "id", "version", "url"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.13. Discovery
6.2.13.1. Version Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
versionMUST use the Semantic Versioning format.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"discoveryVersion.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "discoveryVersion", "readOnly": true },
"version": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"baseUrl": { "type": "string", "format": "uri", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "version", "baseUrl"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.13.2. Environment Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"discoveryEnvironment.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "discoveryEnvironment", "readOnly": true },
"name": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"status": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "name", "status"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.13.3. IDN LGR Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
nameMUST be a valid LGR name as listed in the [IDN-Tables] registry.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"discoveryIdnLgr.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "discoveryIdnLgr", "readOnly": true },
"tld": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"minItems": 1,
"readOnly": true
},
"name": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"url": { "type": "string", "format": "uri", "readOnly": true },
"default": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "tld", "name", "url", "default"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.13.4. Notice Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"discoveryNotice.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "discoveryNotice", "readOnly": true },
"pubTime": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"text": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "pubTime", "text"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.14. Processes Object
The Processes Object is a read-only container grouping the currently active Process Objects on the owning resource object, keyed by process type. Each key holds an array of the corresponding Process Object's read representation, per the Aggregation rules.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"processes.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "processes", "readOnly": true },
"transferProcess": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.reference" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.reference" }
]
},
"readOnly": true
},
"renewProcess": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/renewProcess.reference" },
"readOnly": true
},
"restoreProcess": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/restoreProcess.reference" },
"readOnly": true
},
"createProcess": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/createProcess.reference" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/domainCreateProcess.reference" }
]
},
"readOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.15. Availability
The Availability Objects are the output of the Availability operation. The Base Availability Object is extended by Data Object specific Availability Objects in order to allow independent extensibility.¶
6.2.15.1. Base Availability Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
reasonMUST only be present whenavailableisfalse.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"baseAvailability.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "baseAvailability", "readOnly": true },
"available": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true },
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "available"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.15.2. Domain Name Availability Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"domainNameAvailability.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainNameAvailability", "readOnly": true },
"available": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true },
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "available"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.15.3. Contact Availability Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"contactAvailability.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contactAvailability", "readOnly": true },
"available": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true },
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "available"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.15.4. Host Availability Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"hostAvailability.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "hostAvailability", "readOnly": true },
"available": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true },
"reason": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "available"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16. Messages
All message objects are generated by the server and are read-only from the perspective of the receiving client.¶
The Base Message Object is extended by all other message objects defined in this section. The JSON Schema of each message object repeats the data elements it inherits from the Base Message Object as top-level properties. The value of the @type property identifies the concrete message object and enables a client to determine which data elements to expect.¶
6.2.16.1. Base Message Object
The Base Message Object contains the data elements common to all message objects.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
objectTypeMUST only be used whenobjectIdis present.¶ -
objectIdMUST be a valid unique identifier for the object type specified inobjectTypeor empty whenobjectTypeis not present or empty.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"baseMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "baseMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16.2. Review Response Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"reviewResponseMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "reviewResponseMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"approved": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true },
"clientTransactionId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"serverTransactionId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"completionDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"message": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"process": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/restoreProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/renewProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/createProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/domainCreateProcess.read" }
],
"readOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type", "approved", "serverTransactionId", "completionDate", "message"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16.3. Transfer Request Message Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"transferRequestMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "transferRequestMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"status": { "type": "string", "enum": ["pending"], "readOnly": true },
"requestDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"actionDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"process": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.read" }
],
"readOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type", "status", "requestDate"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16.4. Transfer Outcome Message Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"transferOutcomeMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "transferOutcomeMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"trStatus": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"clientApproved",
"clientCancelled",
"clientRejected",
"serverApproved",
"serverCancelled"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"requestDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"actionDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"process": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.read" }
],
"readOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type", "trStatus", "requestDate", "actionDate"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16.5. Expiration Deletion Message Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"expirationDeletionMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "expirationDeletionMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"deletionDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "deletionDate"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16.6. Auto-Renewal Message Object
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"autoRenewalMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "autoRenewalMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"renewalDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "renewalDate", "expiryDate"]
}
}
}
¶
6.2.16.7. Service Notice Message Object
The Service Notice Message Object extends the Base Message Object. It is not linked to a specific object or process, so objectType, objectId and process are normally absent.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"serviceNoticeMessage.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "serviceNoticeMessage", "readOnly": true },
"objectType": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objectId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"message": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "message"]
}
}
}
¶
6.3. Process Object Schemas
6.3.1. Base Process Object
The Base Process Object is extended by all Process Objects, which repeat its data elements as top-level properties.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
processIdMUST be unique within the scope of the owning resource object.¶
Read schema:¶
{
"$defs": {
"baseProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "baseProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.3.2. Create Process Object
The Create Process Object is extended by object-specific create processes and is submitted only within the processes data element of the owning resource object's create request.¶
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/createProcess.create",
"$defs": {
"createProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "createProcess" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Read response schema (read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/createProcess.read",
"$defs": {
"createProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "createProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/createProcess.reference",
"$defs": {
"createProcess.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "createProcess" },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "processId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.3.3. Renew Process Object
Renew request schema (create-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/renewProcess.create",
"$defs": {
"renewProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "renewProcess" },
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "writeOnly": true },
"renewalPeriod": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.create", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Renew response schema (read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/renewProcess.read",
"$defs": {
"renewProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "renewProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"renewalPeriod": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/renewProcess.reference",
"$defs": {
"renewProcess.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "renewProcess" },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "processId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.3.4. Transfer Process Object
6.3.4.1. Create
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.create",
"$defs": {
"transferProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "transferProcess" },
"transferDir": { "type": "string", "enum": ["pull", "push"], "writeOnly": true },
"gainingClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"],
"allOf": [
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "push" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
},
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "pull" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": {
"not": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
}
}
]
}
}
}
¶
6.3.4.2. Read
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.read",
"$defs": {
"transferProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "transferProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"transferDir": { "type": "string", "enum": ["pull", "push"], "readOnly": true },
"gainingClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"trStatus": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"pending",
"clientApproved",
"clientCancelled",
"clientRejected",
"serverApproved",
"serverCancelled"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"reqClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"requestDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"actClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"actionDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "trStatus", "reqClientId", "requestDate", "actClientId", "actionDate"],
"allOf": [
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "push" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
},
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "pull" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": {
"not": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
}
}
]
}
}
}
¶
6.3.4.3. Approve
The Approve operation MUST always have a request body, which may be an empty JSON object. The server can identify the transfer process to be approved based on the request URL and the authenticated client's permissions. There is no Approve request schema defined in this specification.¶
The Approve response schema MUST equal the read response schema.¶
6.3.4.4. Cancel
The Cancel operation, which is similar to a delete operation, has no request body, the server can identify the transfer process to be cancelled based on the request URL and the authenticated client's permissions. Because the Cancel operation has no request body, it is not possible to extend the request schema with additional properties.¶
The Cancel response schema MUST equal the read response schema or an empty response.¶
6.3.4.5. Reject
Reject request schema:¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.transferReject",
"$defs": {
"transferProcess.transferReject": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "transferProcess" },
"reason": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Reject response schema MUST equal the read response schema.¶
6.3.4.6. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/transferProcess.reference",
"$defs": {
"transferProcess.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "transferProcess" },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "processId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.3.5. Restore Process Object
The Restore Process Object represents the current state of a restore request for an object that has entered the Redemption Grace Period (RGP). It is returned as a response for all restore operations.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
requestDateMUST NOT be present if no restore request has been submitted yet.¶ -
reportDateMUST NOT be present if no restore report has been accepted yet.¶ -
reportDueDateMUST NOT be present whenrestoreStatusis not"pendingRestore".¶
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/restoreProcess.create",
"$defs": {
"restoreProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "restoreProcess" },
"restoreReport": { "$ref": "#/$defs/restoreReport.create" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/restoreProcess.read",
"$defs": {
"restoreProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "restoreProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"restoreStatus": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["pendingRestore", "restored", "rgpPendingDelete"],
"readOnly": true
},
"requestDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"reportDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"reportDueDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"restoreReport": { "$ref": "#/$defs/restoreReport.read" }
},
"required": ["@type", "restoreStatus"]
}
}
}
¶
The Update request applies only to servers that support or require submission of a restore report.¶
Update request schema (read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/restoreProcess.update",
"$defs": {
"restoreProcess.update": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "restoreProcess" },
"restoreReport": { "$ref": "#/$defs/restoreReport.create" }
},
"required": ["@type", "restoreReport"]
}
}
}
¶
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/restoreProcess.reference",
"$defs": {
"restoreProcess.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "restoreProcess" },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "processId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.4. Domain Name Data Object
The Domain Name Data Object represents a domain name and its associated provisioning data.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
nameMUST be a fully qualified domain name conforming to the syntax described in [RFC1035]. Servers MAY restrict allowable domain names to a specific namespace for which they are authoritative. The implicit trailing dot MUST NOT be included.¶ -
nameMUST use the ASCII Compatible Encoding (ACE) A-label form when the domain name is internationalised, as defined in [RFC5890].¶ -
uName, when present, MUST be normalised to Unicode Normalization Form C (NFC) as defined in [UNICODE.NFC], and MUST convert to the exact value ofnameusing the procedure described in Section 4.4.¶ -
lgr, when present, MUST identify a valid Label Generation Ruleset (LGR) registered in the [IDN-Tables] registry, and MUST be present wheneveruNameis present.¶
6.4.1. Availability
The response of the Availability operation is the Domain Name Availability Object, see Section 6.2.15.2.¶
6.4.2. Create
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainName.create",
"$defs": {
"domainName.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainName" },
"name": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname", "writeOnly": true },
"uName": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true },
"lgr": { "type": "string", "writeOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/domainStatus.create" }
},
"registrant": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" },
"contacts": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"nameservers": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/host.reference" }
},
"dns": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsData.create" },
"authInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/authInfo.create" },
"processes": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "processes" },
"createProcess": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/domainCreateProcess.create" }
}
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
},
"required": ["@type", "name"]
}
}
}
¶
6.4.3. Create Process
The Domain Create Process Object extends the Create Process Object and is submitted only within the processes data element of the Domain Name create request.¶
Create request for Domain Create Process Object schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainCreateProcess.create",
"$defs": {
"domainCreateProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainCreateProcess" },
"period": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.create", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Read response for Domain Create Process Object schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainCreateProcess.read",
"$defs": {
"domainCreateProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainCreateProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"period": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Reference for Domain Create Process Object schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainCreateProcess.reference",
"$defs": {
"domainCreateProcess.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainCreateProcess" },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "processId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.4.4. Read
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainName.read",
"$defs": {
"domainName.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainName", "readOnly": true },
"name": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname", "readOnly": true },
"uName": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"lgr": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"provMetadata": { "$ref": "#/$defs/provMetadata.read", "readOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/domainStatus.read" },
"minItems": 1
},
"registrant": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" },
"contacts": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"nameservers": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/host.reference" }
},
"dns": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsData.read" },
"subordinateHosts": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/host.reference" },
"readOnly": true
},
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"authInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/authInfo.read" },
"processes": { "$ref": "#/$defs/processes.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "name", "provMetadata", "status"]
}
}
}
¶
6.4.5. Update
Update request schema (read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainName.update",
"$defs": {
"domainName.update": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainName" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/domainStatus.create" }
},
"registrant": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" },
"contacts": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"nameservers": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/host.reference" }
},
"dns": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsData.create" },
"authInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/authInfo.create" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
6.4.6. Transfer
Create request for Domain Transfer Process Object schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.create",
"$defs": {
"domainTransferProcess.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainTransferProcess" },
"transferDir": { "type": "string", "enum": ["pull", "push"], "writeOnly": true },
"gainingClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "writeOnly": true },
"transferPeriod": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.create", "writeOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type"],
"allOf": [
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "push" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
},
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "pull" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": {
"not": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
}
}
]
}
}
}
¶
Read response for Domain Transfer Process Object schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.read",
"$defs": {
"domainTransferProcess.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainTransferProcess", "readOnly": true },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"transferDir": { "type": "string", "enum": ["pull", "push"], "readOnly": true },
"gainingClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"trStatus": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"pending",
"clientApproved",
"clientCancelled",
"clientRejected",
"serverApproved",
"serverCancelled"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"reqClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"requestDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"actClientId": { "$ref": "#/$defs/clientIdentifier", "readOnly": true },
"actionDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"expiryDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"transferPeriod": { "$ref": "#/$defs/period.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "trStatus", "reqClientId", "requestDate", "actClientId", "actionDate"],
"allOf": [
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "push" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
},
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"transferDir": { "const": "pull" }
},
"required": ["transferDir"]
},
"then": {
"not": { "required": ["gainingClientId"] }
}
}
]
}
}
}
¶
Both Approve and Delete (Cancel) operations have no request body, the server can identify the transfer process to be approved or cancelled based on the request URL and the authenticated client's permissions.¶
Approve and Delete response schemas are the read schema of domainTransferProcess.¶
Reject request Domain Object schema:¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.transferReject",
"$defs": {
"domainTransferProcess.transferReject": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainTransferProcess" },
"reason": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["@type"]
}
}
}
¶
Reject response schema is the read schema of domainTransferProcess.¶
Reference for Domain Transfer Process Object schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainTransferProcess.reference",
"$defs": {
"domainTransferProcess.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainTransferProcess" },
"processId": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "processId"]
}
}
}
¶
6.4.7. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/domainName.reference",
"$defs": {
"domainName.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "domainName" },
"name": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname" }
},
"required": ["@type", "name"]
}
}
}
¶
6.5. Contact Data Object
This document uses version 2.0 of JSContact [RFC9982] for the JSON representation of Contact Data Object contact information. The contact's name, postal address, phone numbers, email addresses, and other contact details are encapsulated in a JSContact Card object embedded in the contactInfo property.¶
6.5.1. JSContact Profile for RPP
Since JSContact is a general-purpose representation of contact data, this document defines a restricted usage profile for use within RPP, see [TODO: ref to RPP JSContact profile here: https://github.com/SIDN/ietf-rpp-jscontact-profile].¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
card.name.fullMUST be provided in the EPP Compatibility Profile.¶ -
card.addresses.addrMUST be provided in the EPP Compatibility Profile, containing at leastcountryCodeand a"locality"kind component.¶ -
card.emails.email.addressMUST be provided in the EPP Compatibility Profile.¶ -
card.addresses[*].countryCodeMUST be a valid two-character ISO 3166-1 [ISO3166-1] alpha-2 code when present.¶
6.5.2. Availability
The response of the Availability operation is the Contact Availability Object, see Section 6.2.15.3.¶
6.5.3. Create
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/contact.create",
"$defs": {
"contact.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contact" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "writeOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contactStatus.create" }
},
"contactInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"authInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/authInfo.create" },
"disclose": { "$ref": "#/$defs/disclose.read" }
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "contactInfo"]
}
}
}
¶
6.5.4. Read
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/contact.read",
"$defs": {
"contact.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contact", "readOnly": true },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "readOnly": true },
"provMetadata": { "$ref": "#/$defs/provMetadata.read", "readOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contactStatus.read" },
"minItems": 1
},
"contactInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"authInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/authInfo.read" },
"disclose": { "$ref": "#/$defs/disclose.read" },
"processes": { "$ref": "#/$defs/processes.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "provMetadata", "status", "contactInfo"]
}
}
}
¶
6.5.5. Update
Update request schema (read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/contact.update",
"$defs": {
"contact.update": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contact" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contactStatus.create" }
},
"contactInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"authInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/authInfo.create" },
"disclose": { "$ref": "#/$defs/disclose.read" }
},
"required": ["@type", "contactInfo"]
}
}
}
¶
6.5.6. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference",
"$defs": {
"contact.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "contact" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier" }
},
"required": ["@type", "id"]
}
}
}
¶
6.6. Host Data Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
hostNameMUST be a syntactically valid fully qualified host name.¶ - If the host name is subordinate to a domain for which the server is authoritative, the superordinate domain MUST already exist in the server.¶
6.6.1. Availability
The response of the Availability operation is the Host Availability Object, see Section 6.2.15.4.¶
6.6.2. Create
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/host.create",
"$defs": {
"host.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "host" },
"hostName": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/hostStatus.create" }
},
"dns": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsData.create" }
},
"required": ["@type", "hostName"]
}
}
}
¶
6.6.3. Read
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/host.read",
"$defs": {
"host.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "host", "readOnly": true },
"hostName": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname" },
"provMetadata": { "$ref": "#/$defs/provMetadata.read", "readOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/hostStatus.read" },
"minItems": 1
},
"dns": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsData.read" },
"processes": { "$ref": "#/$defs/processes.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "hostName", "provMetadata", "status"]
}
}
}
¶
6.6.4. Update
Update request schema (read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/host.update",
"$defs": {
"host.update": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "host" },
"hostName": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/hostStatus.create" }
},
"dns": { "$ref": "#/$defs/dnsData.create" }
},
"required": ["@type", "hostName"]
}
}
}
¶
6.6.5. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/host.reference",
"$defs": {
"host.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "host" },
"hostName": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname" }
},
"required": ["@type", "hostName"]
}
}
}
¶
6.7. Organisation Data Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
idMUST be a server-unique identifier conforming to the Identifier syntax.¶ -
statusMUST always contain at least one value.pendingCreate,ok,hold, andterminatedare mutually exclusive.okMAY only be combined withlinked.¶ -
parent, if present, MUST reference a known Organisation Object. Circular parent references MUST be rejected.¶ -
contactskeys MUST be contact type values registered in the IANA "EPP Organisation Contact Types" registry ([RFC8543]).¶
6.7.1. Create
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.create",
"$defs": {
"organisation.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisation" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "writeOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationStatus.create" }
},
"roles": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationRole.create" },
"minProperties": 1
},
"parent": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.reference" },
"contactInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"contacts": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"users": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/user.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
}
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "roles"]
}
}
}
¶
6.7.2. Read
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.read",
"$defs": {
"organisation.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisation", "readOnly": true },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "readOnly": true },
"provMetadata": { "$ref": "#/$defs/provMetadata.read", "readOnly": true },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationStatus.read" },
"minItems": 1
},
"roles": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationRole.read" },
"minProperties": 1
},
"parent": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.reference" },
"contactInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"contacts": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"users": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/user.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"processes": { "$ref": "#/$defs/processes.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "provMetadata", "status", "roles"]
}
}
}
¶
6.7.3. Update
Update request schema (read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.update",
"$defs": {
"organisation.update": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisation" },
"status": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationStatus.create" }
},
"roles": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisationRole.create" },
"minProperties": 1
},
"parent": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.reference" },
"contactInfo": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"contacts": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/contact.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
},
"users": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "$ref": "#/$defs/user.reference" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
}
}
},
"required": ["@type", "roles"]
}
}
}
¶
6.7.4. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.reference",
"$defs": {
"organisation.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "organisation" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier" }
},
"required": ["@type", "id"]
}
}
}
¶
6.8. Message Data Object
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
datais polymorphic: it MUST contain an instance of a message object that directly or indirectly extends the Base Message Object. The concrete message object is identified by the@typeof the value used for thedataproperty.¶
6.8.1. Create
Create request schema. Only the server is authorised to create Message Data Objects, so the representation also carries the server-managed data elements id, creationDate and status.¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/message.create",
"$defs": {
"message.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "message" },
"data": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/reviewResponseMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferRequestMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferOutcomeMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/expirationDeletionMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/autoRenewalMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/serviceNoticeMessage.read" }
],
"writeOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type", "data"]
}
}
}
¶
6.8.2. Read
Read response schema (read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/message.read",
"$defs": {
"message.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "message", "readOnly": true },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "readOnly": true },
"creationDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"status": { "type": "string", "enum": ["queued", "delivered", "removed"], "readOnly": true },
"data": {
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/reviewResponseMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferRequestMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/transferOutcomeMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/expirationDeletionMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/autoRenewalMessage.read" },
{ "$ref": "#/$defs/serviceNoticeMessage.read" }
],
"readOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "creationDate", "status", "data"]
}
}
}
¶
6.8.3. Query
Query response schema (array of message read representations):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/message.query",
"$defs": {
"message.query": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/message.read" }
}
}
}
¶
6.8.4. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/message.reference",
"$defs": {
"message.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "message" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "id"]
}
}
}
¶
6.9. User Data Object
The User Data Object represents a user linked to an Organisation Object. The lifecycle of a User Object is bound to its owning Organisation Object.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:
- The "status" array MUST contain exactly one of the labels "active", "pending", "suspended", or "deactivated".¶
6.9.1. Create
Create request schema (create-only and read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/user.create",
"$defs": {
"user.create": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "user" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "writeOnly": true },
"details": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"description": { "type": "string" },
"status": { "$ref": "#/$defs/userStatus.create" }
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "details"]
}
}
}
¶
6.9.2. Read
Read response schema (read-write and read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/user.read",
"$defs": {
"user.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "user", "readOnly": true },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier", "readOnly": true },
"details": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"description": { "type": "string" },
"status": { "$ref": "#/$defs/userStatus.read" },
"organisation": { "$ref": "#/$defs/organisation.reference", "readOnly": true },
"processes": { "$ref": "#/$defs/processes.read", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "id", "details", "status", "organisation"]
}
}
}
¶
6.9.3. Update
Update request schema (read-write properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/user.update",
"$defs": {
"user.update": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "user" },
"details": { "$ref": "#/$defs/Card" },
"description": { "type": "string" },
"status": { "$ref": "#/$defs/userStatus.create" }
},
"required": ["@type", "details"]
}
}
}
¶
6.9.4. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/user.reference",
"$defs": {
"user.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "user" },
"id": { "$ref": "#/$defs/identifier" }
},
"required": ["@type", "id"]
}
}
}
¶
6.10. Discovery Data Object
The Discovery Data Object describes the capabilities of an RPP server. The server provides a single Discovery Data Object, which has no Unique Identifier. All data elements are read-only, and the only supported operation is Read.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
datetimeMUST be expressed in UTC using theZsuffix and MUST NOT use a numeric UTC offset.¶ - Each
objectvalue inlinksMUST be an absolute URL using the HTTPS scheme, and the document MUST be accessible to the client without authentication.¶ - Each
labelinlinksMUST be a link relation type registered in the IANA "Link Relation Types" registry.¶ - Each value in
objectsMUST be a valid object identifier as defined in the RPP Data Object Registry.¶
6.10.1. Read
Read response schema (read-only properties).¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/discovery.read",
"$defs": {
"discovery.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "discovery", "readOnly": true },
"versions": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/discoveryVersion.read" },
"minItems": 1,
"readOnly": true
},
"environment": { "$ref": "#/$defs/discoveryEnvironment.read", "readOnly": true },
"tlds": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"minItems": 1,
"readOnly": true
},
"extensions": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/extension.read" },
"readOnly": true
},
"profiles": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"readOnly": true
},
"objects": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"minItems": 1,
"readOnly": true
},
"datetime": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "readOnly": true },
"links": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"label": { "type": "string" },
"object": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["label", "object"]
},
"readOnly": true
},
"idnLgr": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/discoveryIdnLgr.read" },
"readOnly": true
},
"notices": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/discoveryNotice.read" },
"readOnly": true
}
},
"required": ["@type", "versions", "environment", "tlds", "objects", "datetime"]
}
}
}
¶
6.11. Profile Data Object
The Profile Data Object represents a named set of protocol features and versions published by the server. All data elements are read-only, and the only supported operation is Read.¶
The following constraints cannot be expressed in JSON Schema and MUST be enforced by implementations:¶
-
nameof a standard profile MUST use the RPP URN namespace, for exampleurn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:{profile_name}. Thenameof a private profile MUST be globally unique, the use of reverse domain name notation is RECOMMENDED.¶ - A profile MUST NOT list the same extension name more than once, and the server MUST support all extensions listed in the profile.¶
- The profile referenced by
baseProfileMUST NOT itself have abaseProfile, and a profile MUST NOT be its own base profile.¶ - Only one profile MUST have
defaultProfileset totrue.¶
6.11.1. Read
Read response schema (read-only properties):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/profile.read",
"$defs": {
"profile.read": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "profile", "readOnly": true },
"name": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"description": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"version": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"rppVersion": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true },
"objects": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"minItems": 1,
"readOnly": true
},
"extensions": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/extension.read" },
"readOnly": true
},
"baseProfile": { "$ref": "#/$defs/profile.reference", "readOnly": true },
"defaultProfile": { "type": "boolean", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": [
"@type",
"name",
"description",
"version",
"rppVersion",
"objects",
"defaultProfile"
]
}
}
}
¶
6.11.2. Reference
Reference schema (identifier only):¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$ref": "#/$defs/profile.reference",
"$defs": {
"profile.reference": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"@type": { "type": "string", "const": "profile" },
"name": { "type": "string", "readOnly": true }
},
"required": ["@type", "name"]
}
}
}
¶
7. Extension Framework
Extensions MUST employ an additive schema composition method, allowing new optional or required properties to be added to an existing base object schema. New properties MUST not conflict with existing definitions and MUST NOT redefine existing properties from the base schema.¶
To support multiple extensions, a mechanism for mapping extensions to their respective base objects is defined using the rpp:extends property within the extension schema.¶
Extensions SHOULD be independent of one another, meaning that an extension should not rely on the presence of another extension to function correctly. This ensures modularity and reduces the risk of conflicts between extensions.¶
An extension schema MUST define a unique identifier using a top-level $id to ensure that references to the schema are unambiguous and correctly resolved. For IETF standardised extensions, using a stable and unique URI as the $id is RECOMMENDED.¶
An IANA registry for RPP JSON extensions is requested in this document, standardised JSON extensions SHALL be registered in this registry. Ensuring that each extension has a unique and stable identifier that can be referenced reliably across different implementations. This also promotes the reuse of common extensions and reduces duplication of effort.¶
It is RECOMMENDED to use the prefix "ext." for every extension sub-schema defined, for example #/$defs/ext.domainFoo.¶
TODO what objects are eligible for extensions?¶
7.1. Extension Mapping
Each extension MUST define a mapping to every base object it applies to, this is done by using a special rpp:extends property within the extension schema. For example, this mapping where the base object https://rpp.example/rpp/schema.json#/$defs/domainName.create is extended by the local definition #/$defs/ext.domainFoo:¶
{
"rpp:extends": {
"https://rpp.example/rpp/schema.json#/$defs/domainName.create":
"#/$defs/ext.domainFoo"
}
}
¶
7.2. Effective Schema
Extensions are additive and independent, the effective schema for a base object MUST account for all applicable extensions to ensure that a validator can determine whether an object fully conforms to the combined set of constraints. When one or more extensions are applied to a base object, the effective schema for that object is obtained by composing the base object's schema with the schemas contributed by each extension using the allOf keyword, the server uses the rpp:extends metadata property to resolve the mapping between the base object and its extensions correctly.¶
The resulting schema is a self-contained schema that includes everything from both the base specification and the extensions, allowing clients to validate objects against a single comprehensive schema.¶
The following is an example of an extension JSON Schema, which adds new properties to both the domain and contact base objects:¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$id": "https://rpp.example/schemas/extension1.json",
"rpp:extends": {
"https://rpp.example/rpp/schema.json#/$defs/domainName.create":
"#/$defs/ext.domain",
"https://rpp.example/rpp/schema.json#/$defs/contact.create":
"#/$defs/ext.contact"
},
"$defs": {
"ext.domain": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"foo": { "type": "string" },
"bar": { "type": "boolean" }
},
"required": ["foo"]
},
"ext.contact": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"fooContact": { "type": "string" }
}
}
}
}
¶
The effective schema is a distinct schema resource from the base schema it composes and therefore MUST be assigned its own $id, different from the $id of the base schema and of any other effective schema, to avoid ambiguous or circular references. It is RECOMMENDED to use the prefix "effective." for every effective sub-schema defined, for example #/$defs/effective.domainFoo.¶
Domain Name effective schema, which includes the full schema of the base domain object along with any applicable extensions:¶
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$id": "https://rpp.example/rpp/effective/domain.json",
"$ref": "#/$defs/effective.domainName.create",
"$defs": {
"effective.domainName.create": {
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "https://rpp.example/rpp/schema.json#/$defs/domainName.create"
},
{
"$ref": "#/$defs/ext.domain"
}
]
},
"ext.domain": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"foo": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": ["foo"]
}
}
}
¶
8. Examples
This section provides examples that follow the JSON representation rules and JSON Schema definitions specified in the previous sections. The examples illustrate typical request and response messages for the RPP Data Objects defined in [I-D.ietf-rpp-data-objects].¶
8.1. Domain Name
8.1.1. Availability
Example domain availability response for a domain name that can be created:¶
{
"@type": "domainNameAvailability",
"available": true
}
¶
Example domain availability response for a domain name that cannot be created:¶
{
"@type": "domainNameAvailability",
"available": false,
"reason": "In use"
}
¶
8.1.2. Create
Example domain create request:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"nameservers": [
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns1.example.example" },
{ "@type": "host", "hostName": "ns2.example.example" }
],
"registrant": { "@type": "contact", "id": "JD-1234" },
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" } }
],
"authInfo": {
"@type": "authInfo",
"method": "authinfo",
"authdata": "2fooBAR"
},
"processes": {
"@type": "processes",
"createProcess": [
{
"@type": "domainCreateProcess",
"period": {
"@type": "period",
"value": 2,
"unit": "y"
}
}
]
}
}
¶
Example domain create response from a server with RGP support:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "EXAMPLE1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "ok" },
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "rgpAddPeriod" }
],
"expiryDate": "2001-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.1.3. Create Process Data
Example Create Process Object without object-specific create inputs, as returned in a read response:¶
{
"@type": "createProcess",
"processId": "CRT-1002"
}
¶
Example Create Process Object for a two-year domain registration period, as embedded above in processes.createProcess:¶
{
"@type": "domainCreateProcess",
"period": {
"@type": "period",
"value": 2,
"unit": "y"
}
}
¶
8.1.4. Read
Example domain read response:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "EXAMPLE1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientY",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z",
"upClientId": "ClientX",
"upDate": "1999-12-03T09:00:00.0Z",
"trDate": "2000-04-08T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"registrant": { "@type": "contact", "id": "JD-1234" },
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" } }
],
"nameservers": [
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.example.example"
},
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns2.example.example"
}
],
"subordinateHosts": [
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.example.example"
},
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns2.example.example"
}
],
"expiryDate": "2005-04-03T22:00:00.0Z",
"authInfo": {
"@type": "authInfo",
"method": "authinfo",
"authdata": "2fooBAR"
},
"processes": {
"@type": "processes",
"createProcess": [
{ "@type": "domainCreateProcess", "processId": "CRT-1001" }
]
}
}
¶
Example Read response for an internationalised domain name, showing the ACE name, the corresponding uName, and the lgr identifying the Label Generation Ruleset (LGR) used for validation:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "xn--bcher-kva.example",
"uName": "bücher.example",
"lgr": "latn-1.0",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "BUCHER1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "ok" }
]
}
¶
8.1.5. Update
Example domain update request (read-write properties):¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"registrant": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" },
"authInfo": {
"@type": "authInfo",
"method": "authinfo",
"authdata": "2BARfoo"
}
}
¶
Example domain update response:¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "EXAMPLE1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientY",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z",
"upClientId": "ClientX",
"upDate": "2000-01-15T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"registrant": { "@type": "contact", "id": "SH-8013" }
}
¶
8.1.6. Delete
The domain delete operation takes the domain name as the resource identifier in the request. No request body is required.¶
Example domain delete response (minimal, server may return full representation):¶
{
"@type": "domainName",
"name": "example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "EXAMPLE1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "domainStatus", "label": "pendingDelete" }
]
}
¶
8.1.7. Renew
The renew operation creates a Renew Process Object. The optional expiryDate in the request is the current expiry date, sent by the client for server-side validation to prevent duplicate renewals. The response returns a Renew Process Object containing the new expiry date.¶
Example domain renew request:¶
{
"@type": "renewProcess",
"expiryDate": "2005-04-03T22:00:00.0Z",
"renewalPeriod": {
"@type": "period",
"value": 5,
"unit": "y"
}
}
¶
Example domain renew response:¶
{
"@type": "renewProcess",
"expiryDate": "2010-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.1.8. Transfer Request
Authorisation information for the transfer MUST be conveyed using the RPP-Authorization HTTP header (see Authorisation Information in Requests), not in the JSON request body.¶
Example domain transfer request (pull transfer):¶
{
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"transferDir": "pull",
"transferPeriod": {
"@type": "period",
"value": 1,
"unit": "y"
}
}
¶
Example domain transfer response (Transfer Process Object):¶
{
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2000-06-08T22:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2000-06-13T22:00:00.0Z",
"expiryDate": "2002-09-08T22:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.1.9. Transfer Query
Example domain transfer query response (Transfer Process Object):¶
{
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2000-06-06T22:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2000-06-11T22:00:00.0Z",
"expiryDate": "2002-09-08T22:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.1.10. Transfer Approve
The Transfer approve operation has a request body with an empty JSON object, the server can identify the transfer process to be approved based on the request URL and the authenticated client's permissions.¶
Example domain transfer approve request with empty JSON object:¶
{
"@type": "domainTransferProcess"
}
¶
The response is the Transfer Process Object, similar to the Create (Transfer Request) and Read (Transfer Query) responses.¶
8.1.11. Transfer Cancel
The Transfer cancel operation has an empty request body, the server can identify the transfer process to be cancelled based on the request URL and the authenticated client's permissions.¶
The response is the Transfer Process Object, similar to the Create (Transfer Request) and Read (Transfer Query) responses.¶
8.1.12. Transfer Reject
Example domain transfer reject request:¶
{
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"reason": "Client rejected the transfer request."
}
¶
The transfer reject response is the Transfer Process Object, similar to the Create (Transfer Request) and Read (Transfer Query) responses.¶
8.1.13. Restore Request
Example domain restore request (without inline report; object transitions to pendingRestore state):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess"
}
¶
Example domain restore response (Restore Process Object, server requires a report):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "pendingRestore",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDueDate": "2025-01-27T15:30:00.0Z"
}
¶
Example domain restore request with inline restore report (single-step; object restored immediately):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreReport": {
"@type": "restoreReport",
"preData": "Domain example.example was registered on 2024-01-15 with registrant JD-1234.",
"postData": "Domain example.example is being restored with the same registration data.",
"deleteTime": "2025-01-10T12:00:00.0Z",
"restoreTime": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"restoreReason": "Domain deleted in error by client operator.",
"statements": [
"The information in this report is true to the best of my knowledge.",
"I have a valid reason for restoring this domain name."
]
}
}
¶
Example domain restore response with inline report (Restore Process Object, immediately restored):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "restored",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.1.14. Restore Report
Example domain restore report request:¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreReport": {
"@type": "restoreReport",
"preData": "Domain example.example was registered on 2024-01-15 with registrant JD-1234.",
"postData": "Domain example.example is being restored with the same registration data.",
"deleteTime": "2025-01-10T12:00:00.0Z",
"restoreTime": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"restoreReason": "Domain deleted in error by client operator.",
"statements": [
"The information in this report is true to the best of my knowledge.",
"I have a valid reason for restoring this domain name."
]
}
}
¶
Example domain restore report response (Restore Process Object):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "restored",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDate": "2025-01-22T09:15:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.1.15. Read (Restore Query)
The Read (Restore Query) operation takes no request body (Parameters: None).¶
Example domain restore query response (Restore Process Object, object in pendingRestore state):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "pendingRestore",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDueDate": "2025-01-27T15:30:00.0Z"
}
¶
Example domain restore query response (Restore Process Object, object restored):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "restored",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDate": "2025-01-22T09:15:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.2. Contact
8.2.1. Availability
Example contact availability response for a contact that cannot be created:¶
{
"@type": "contactAvailability",
"available": false,
"reason": "In use"
}
¶
8.2.2. Create
Example contact create request:¶
{
"@type": "contact",
"id": "JD-1234",
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": {
"full": "John Doe"
},
"organizations": {
"org": { "name": "Example Inc." }
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "123 Example Dr., Suite 100" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Dulles" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "VA" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "20166-6503" }
],
"countryCode": "US"
}
},
"phones": {
"voice": { "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5555" },
"fax": { "features": { "fax": true }, "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5556" }
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "jdoe@example.example" }
}
},
"authInfo": {
"@type": "authInfo",
"method": "authinfo",
"authdata": "2fooBAR"
}
}
¶
Example contact create response:¶
{
"@type": "contact",
"id": "JD-1234",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "JD1234-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "contactStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": {
"full": "John Doe"
},
"organizations": {
"org": { "name": "Example Inc." }
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "123 Example Dr., Suite 100" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Dulles" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "VA" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "20166-6503" }
],
"countryCode": "US"
}
},
"phones": {
"voice": { "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5555" },
"fax": { "features": { "fax": true }, "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5556" }
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "jdoe@example.example" }
}
}
}
¶
8.2.3. Read
Example contact read response:¶
{
"@type": "contact",
"id": "JD-1234",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "JD1234-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z",
"upClientId": "ClientX",
"upDate": "2000-01-15T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "contactStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": {
"full": "John Doe"
},
"organizations": {
"org": { "name": "Example Inc." }
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "123 Example Dr., Suite 100" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Dulles" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "VA" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "20166-6503" }
],
"countryCode": "US"
}
},
"phones": {
"voice": { "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5555" }
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "jdoe@example.example" }
}
}
}
¶
8.2.4. Update
Example contact update request:¶
{
"@type": "contact",
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "456 New Street, Suite 200" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Reston" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "VA" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "20190" }
],
"countryCode": "US"
}
},
"phones": {
"voice": { "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5556" }
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "jdoe-new@example.example" }
}
}
}
¶
Example contact update response:¶
{
"@type": "contact",
"id": "JD-1234",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "JD1234-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z",
"upClientId": "ClientX",
"upDate": "2025-06-01T10:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "contactStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": {
"full": "John Doe"
},
"organizations": {
"org": { "name": "Example Inc." }
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "456 New Street, Suite 200" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Reston" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "VA" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "20190" }
],
"countryCode": "US"
}
},
"phones": {
"voice": { "number": "tel:+1-703-555-5556" }
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "jdoe-new@example.example" }
}
}
}
¶
8.2.5. Delete
The contact delete operation takes the contact identifier as the resource identifier. No request body is required.¶
8.2.6. Transfer Request
Authorisation information for the transfer MUST be conveyed using the RPP-Authorization HTTP header (see Authorisation Information in Requests), not in the JSON request body.¶
Example contact transfer request (pull transfer):¶
{
"@type": "transferProcess",
"transferDir": "pull"
}
¶
Example contact transfer response (Transfer Process Object):¶
{
"@type": "transferProcess",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2000-06-08T22:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2000-06-13T22:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.2.7. Transfer Query
Example contact transfer query response (Transfer Process Object):¶
{
"@type": "transferProcess",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2000-06-06T22:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2000-06-11T22:00:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.2.8. Transfer Cancel / Approve
Transfer cancel and approve responses return the Transfer Process Object. The response structure is the same as the Transfer Query response above. The trStatus value reflects the outcome of the operation (e.g. "clientCancelled", "clientRejected", or "clientApproved").¶
8.2.9. Transfer Reject
Example contact transfer reject request:¶
{
"@type": "transferProcess",
"reason": "Client rejected the transfer request."
}
¶
The transfer reject response is the Transfer Process Object, similar to the Create (Transfer Request) and Read (Transfer Query) responses.¶
8.3. Host
8.3.1. Availability
Example host availability response for a host that can be created:¶
{
"@type": "hostAvailability",
"available": true
}
¶
8.3.2. Create
Example host create request:¶
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.example.example",
"dns": {
"@type": "dnsData",
"records": [
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "@",
"type": "ns",
"rdata": { "nsdname": "ns1.example.example." }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.example.example.",
"type": "a",
"rdata": { "address": "192.0.2.1" }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.example.example.",
"type": "aaaa",
"rdata": { "address": "2001:db8::1" }
}
],
"controls": {
"@type": "dnsControls",
"ttl": { "a": 3600, "aaaa": 3600 }
}
}
}
¶
Example host create response:¶
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "NS1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "hostStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"dns": {
"@type": "dnsData",
"records": [
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "@",
"type": "ns",
"rdata": { "nsdname": "ns1.example.example." }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.example.example.",
"type": "a",
"rdata": { "address": "192.0.2.1" }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.example.example.",
"type": "aaaa",
"rdata": { "address": "2001:db8::1" }
}
],
"controls": {
"@type": "dnsControls",
"ttl": { "a": 3600, "aaaa": 3600 }
}
}
}
¶
8.3.3. Read
Example host read response:¶
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.example.example",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "NS1-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientY",
"crDate": "1999-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "hostStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"dns": {
"@type": "dnsData",
"records": [
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "@",
"type": "ns",
"rdata": { "nsdname": "ns1.example.example." }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.example.example.",
"type": "a",
"rdata": { "address": "192.0.2.1" }
}
]
}
}
¶
8.3.4. Update
Example host update request:¶
{
"@type": "host",
"hostName": "ns1.example.example",
"dns": {
"@type": "dnsData",
"records": [
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "@",
"type": "ns",
"rdata": { "nsdname": "ns1.example.example." }
},
{
"@type": "dnsRecord",
"name": "ns1.example.example.",
"type": "a",
"rdata": { "address": "198.51.100.1" }
}
]
}
}
¶
8.3.5. Delete
The host delete operation takes the host name as the resource identifier. No request body is required. The server SHOULD reject the request if the host object is associated with any domain name objects.¶
8.3.6. Restore Request
Example host restore request (without inline report; object transitions to pendingRestore state):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess"
}
¶
Example host restore request response (Restore Process Object, server requires a report):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "pendingRestore",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDueDate": "2025-01-27T15:30:00.0Z"
}
¶
Example host restore request with inline restore report (single-step; object restored immediately):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreReport": {
"@type": "restoreReport",
"preData": "Host ns1.example.example was registered on 2024-01-15 by ClientX.",
"postData": "Host ns1.example.example is being restored with the same registration data.",
"deleteTime": "2025-01-10T12:00:00.0Z",
"restoreTime": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"restoreReason": "Host deleted in error by client operator.",
"statements": [
"The information in this report is true to the best of my knowledge.",
"I have a valid reason for restoring this host object."
]
}
}
¶
Example host restore response with inline report (Restore Process Object, immediately restored):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "restored",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.3.7. Restore Report
Example host restore report request:¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreReport": {
"@type": "restoreReport",
"preData": "Host ns1.example.example was registered on 2024-01-15 by ClientX.",
"postData": "Host ns1.example.example is being restored with the same registration data.",
"deleteTime": "2025-01-10T12:00:00.0Z",
"restoreTime": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"restoreReason": "Host deleted in error by client operator.",
"statements": [
"The information in this report is true to the best of my knowledge.",
"I have a valid reason for restoring this host object."
]
}
}
¶
Example host restore report response (Restore Process Object):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "restored",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDate": "2025-01-22T09:15:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.3.8. Read (Restore Query)
The Read (Restore Query) operation takes no request body (Parameters: None).¶
Example host restore query response (Restore Process Object, object in pendingRestore state):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "pendingRestore",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDueDate": "2025-01-27T15:30:00.0Z"
}
¶
Example host restore query response (Restore Process Object, object restored):¶
{
"@type": "restoreProcess",
"restoreStatus": "restored",
"requestDate": "2025-01-20T15:30:00.0Z",
"reportDate": "2025-01-22T09:15:00.0Z"
}
¶
8.4. Organisation
8.4.1. Create
Example organisation create request:¶
{
"@type": "organisation",
"id": "ORG-12345",
"roles": { "registrar":
{
"@type": "organisationRole",
"roleId": "1234"
}
},
"parent": { "@type": "organisation", "id": "ORG-9999" },
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "org",
"name": {
"full": "Example Registrar Inc."
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "Meander 501" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Arnhem" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "Gelderland" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "6825MD" }
],
"countryCode": "NL"
}
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "registrar@example.example" }
}
},
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-1001" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-1002" } }
]
}
¶
Example organisation create response:¶
{
"@type": "organisation",
"id": "ORG-12345",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "ORG12345-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "2025-03-15T10:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "organisationStatus", "label": "ok" }
],
"roles": { "registrar":
{
"@type": "organisationRole",
"status": [ { "@type": "organisationRoleStatus", "label": "ok" } ],
"roleId": "1234"
}
},
"parent": { "@type": "organisation", "id": "ORG-9999" },
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "org",
"name": {
"full": "Example Registrar Inc."
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "Meander 501" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Arnhem" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "Gelderland" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "6825MD" }
],
"countryCode": "NL"
}
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "registrar@example.example" }
}
},
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-1001" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-1002" } }
],
"users": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "user", "id": "UID-5001" } }
]
}
¶
8.4.2. Read
Example organisation read response:¶
{
"@type": "organisation",
"id": "ORG-12345",
"provMetadata": {
"@type": "provMetadata",
"repositoryId": "ORG12345-REP",
"spClientId": "ClientX",
"crClientId": "ClientX",
"crDate": "2025-03-15T10:00:00.0Z",
"upClientId": "ClientX",
"upDate": "2025-06-01T08:30:00.0Z"
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "organisationStatus", "label": "linked" }
],
"roles": { "registrar":
{
"@type": "organisationRole",
"status": [ { "@type": "organisationRoleStatus", "label": "ok" } ],
"roleId": "1234"
}
},
"parent": { "@type": "organisation", "id": "ORG-9999" },
"contactInfo": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "org",
"name": {
"full": "Example Registrar Inc."
},
"addresses": {
"addr": {
"components": [
{ "kind": "name", "value": "Meander 501" },
{ "kind": "locality", "value": "Arnhem" },
{ "kind": "region", "value": "Gelderland" },
{ "kind": "postcode", "value": "6825MD" }
],
"countryCode": "NL"
}
},
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "registrar@example.example" }
}
},
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-1001" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-1002" } }
],
"users": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "user", "id": "UID-5001" } }
]
}
¶
8.4.3. Update
Example organisation update request:¶
{
"@type": "organisation",
"roles": { "registrar":
{
"@type": "organisationRole",
"status": [ { "@type": "organisationRoleStatus", "label": "clientLinkProhibited" } ],
"roleId": "1234"
}
},
"status": [
{ "@type": "organisationStatus", "label": "clientLinkProhibited" }
],
"contacts": [
{ "label": "admin", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-2001" } },
{ "label": "tech", "object": { "@type": "contact", "id": "CID-2002" } }
]
}
¶
8.5. User
8.5.1. Create
Example user create request:¶
{
"@type": "user",
"id": "UID-5001",
"details": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": { "full": "John Doe" },
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "john.doe@example.example" }
}
}
}
¶
Example user create response:¶
{
"@type": "user",
"id": "UID-5001",
"details": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": { "full": "John Doe" },
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "john.doe@example.example" }
}
},
"status": { "@type": "userStatus", "label": "pending" },
"organisation": { "@type": "organisation", "id": "ORG-12345" }
}
¶
8.5.2. Read
Example user read response:¶
{
"@type": "user",
"id": "UID-5001",
"details": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": { "full": "John Doe" },
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "john.doe@example.example" }
}
},
"status": { "@type": "userStatus", "label": "active" },
"organisation": { "@type": "organisation", "id": "ORG-12345" }
}
¶
8.5.3. Update
Example user update request (suspend the user):¶
{
"@type": "user",
"status": { "@type": "userStatus", "label": "suspended" },
"details": {
"@type": "Card",
"version": "2.0",
"kind": "individual",
"name": { "full": "John Doe" },
"emails": {
"email": { "address": "john.doe@example.example" }
}
}
}
¶
8.6. Message
8.6.1. Create
Example message create request using a Transfer Request Message Object, notifying the recipient organisation that a transfer of the domain name transfer-test.example is pending and requires action:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"data": {
"@type": "transferRequestMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "transfer-test.example",
"process": {
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"processId": "TRF-1001",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": "pending",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
}
}
¶
Example message create response:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98765",
"creationDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "transferRequestMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "transfer-test.example",
"process": {
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"processId": "TRF-1001",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": "pending",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
}
}
¶
8.6.2. Read
Example message read response:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98765",
"creationDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": "delivered",
"data": {
"@type": "transferRequestMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "transfer-test.example",
"process": {
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"processId": "TRF-1001",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": "pending",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
}
}
¶
Example message read response with a Review Response Object:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98770",
"creationDate": "2026-09-19T14:30:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "reviewResponseMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "review-test.example",
"approved": true,
"clientTransactionId": "ABC-12345",
"serverTransactionId": "54322-XYZ",
"completionDate": "2026-09-19T14:30:00.0Z",
"message": "The domain name registration was approved."
}
}
¶
Example message read response with a Transfer Outcome Message Object:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98771",
"creationDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "transferOutcomeMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "transfer-test.example",
"process": {
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"processId": "TRF-1001",
"trStatus": "serverApproved",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"trStatus": "serverApproved",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z",
"expiryDate": "2028-04-03T22:00:00.0Z"
}
}
¶
Example message read response with an Auto-Renewal Message Object:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98772",
"creationDate": "2026-09-23T00:05:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "autoRenewalMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "renewed.example",
"renewalDate": "2026-09-23T00:05:00.0Z",
"expiryDate": "2027-09-23T00:00:00.0Z"
}
}
¶
Example message read response with an Expiration Deletion Message Object:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98774",
"creationDate": "2026-09-25T00:05:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "expirationDeletionMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "expired.example",
"deletionDate": "2026-09-25T00:00:00.0Z"
}
}
¶
Example message read response with a Service Notice Message Object, which is not linked to a specific object:¶
{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98773",
"creationDate": "2026-09-24T08:00:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "serviceNoticeMessage",
"message": "The registry terms and conditions have been updated."
}
}
¶
8.6.3. Query
There is no request message for the message query operation.¶
Example message query response, containing a Transfer Request Message Object for the domain transfer-test.example:¶
[{
"@type": "message",
"id": "MSG-98765",
"creationDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"status": "queued",
"data": {
"@type": "transferRequestMessage",
"objectType": "domainName",
"objectId": "transfer-test.example",
"process": {
"@type": "domainTransferProcess",
"processId": "TRF-1001",
"trStatus": "pending",
"transferDir": "pull",
"reqClientId": "ClientX",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actClientId": "ClientY",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
},
"status": "pending",
"requestDate": "2026-09-17T09:00:00.0Z",
"actionDate": "2026-09-22T09:00:00.0Z"
}
}]
¶
8.7. Discovery
8.7.1. Read
There is no request message for the discovery read operation.¶
Example discovery read response:¶
{
"@type": "discovery",
"versions": [
{
"@type": "discoveryVersion",
"version": "1.0",
"baseUrl": "https://rpp.example/rpp"
}
],
"environment": {
"@type": "discoveryEnvironment",
"name": "rpp.example",
"status": "production"
},
"tlds": ["example"],
"extensions": [
{
"@type": "extension",
"name": "RPP example extension",
"id": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:extension:example-extension",
"version": "1.0",
"url": "https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpp-extensions/rpp-example-extension"
}
],
"profiles": ["urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:epp-compatibility"],
"objects": ["domainName", "host", "contact"],
"datetime": "2026-05-31T12:30:00Z",
"links": [
{ "label": "privacy-policy", "object": "https://registry.example/privacy" },
{ "label": "terms-of-service", "object": "https://registry.example/terms" }
],
"idnLgr": [
{
"@type": "discoveryIdnLgr",
"tld": ["example"],
"name": "example-latn-1.0",
"url": "https://www.iana.org/domains/idn-tables/tables/example_latn_1.0.txt",
"default": true
}
],
"notices": [
{
"@type": "discoveryNotice",
"pubTime": "2026-06-01T00:00:00Z",
"text": "This server will undergo planned maintenance on the first Monday of each month."
}
]
}
¶
8.8. Profile
8.8.1. Read
There is no request message for the profile read operation.¶
Example profile read response:¶
{
"@type": "profile",
"name": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:epp-compatibility",
"description": "EPP compatibility profile",
"version": "1.0",
"rppVersion": "1.0",
"objects": ["domainName", "host", "contact"],
"extensions": [
{
"@type": "extension",
"name": "RPP example extension",
"id": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:extension:example-extension",
"version": "1.0",
"url": "https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpp-extensions/rpp-example-extension"
}
],
"defaultProfile": true
}
¶
Example profile read response for a profile that extends a base profile:¶
{
"@type": "profile",
"name": "org.example.rpp.profile.registry-extended",
"description": "Registry specific profile extending the EPP compatibility profile",
"version": "1.0",
"rppVersion": "1.0",
"objects": ["domainName", "host", "contact"],
"baseProfile": {
"@type": "profile",
"name": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:epp-compatibility"
},
"defaultProfile": false
}
¶
9. IANA Considerations
9.1. RPP Media Type (application/rpp+json)
The IANA is requested to add the "application/rpp+json" media type to the "Media Types" registry, following the template in [RFC6838]¶
Type name: application
Subtype name: rpp+json
Required parameters: "N/A"
Optional parameters: profile, version
Encoding considerations: "N/A"
Security considerations: This type has all of the security
considerations described in [@!RFC8259] plus the
considerations specified in the Security Considerations
section of this document.
The usage scenarios of the RPP media type do not foresee any
code execution originating from the content of this media type.
Interoperability considerations: "N/A"
Published specification: This document
Applications that use this media type: RPP protocol and extensions
Fragment identifier considerations: "N/A"
Additional information:
Deprecated alias names for this type: "N/A"
Magic number(s): "N/A"
File extension(s): "N/A"
Macintosh file type code(s): "N/A"
Person & email address to contact for further information: Author's email address
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: "N/A"
Author: Document authors
Change controller: Document authors
Provisional registration: No
¶
9.2. RPP JSON Schema Extensions Registry
The IANA is requested to create a new registry for RPP JSON Schema extensions, this registry will be used to register standardised JSON Schema extensions to the JSON representation of RPP JSON objects, as defined in the Section 7 of this document.¶
Name of the registry: RPP JSON Schema Extensions Registry group: RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP) Registration procedure: Expert Review¶
Fields to be registered:¶
-
name: The name of the extension, for example "RPP example JSON extension".¶ -
id: The unique$idURI of the extension JSON Schema, for example "https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpp-json-extensions/example-extension.json".¶ -
version: The version of the extension, for example "1.0".¶ -
RFC: The RFC number for the extension specification, for example "RFC 1234".¶ -
description: A human-readable description of the extension and its intended use.¶
The "RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)" registry group is defined in [I-D.ietf-rpp-core].¶
TODO there already exists a registry for RPP extensions, defined in the rpp-core document, consider whether this new registry is necessary or if it should be merged with the existing one.¶
10. Internationalization Considerations
Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) are represented using the paired name/uName data elements described in the Domain Name Data Object. The name property, which addresses the resource and is used for object identity, MUST always contain the ACE A-label form; the uName property carries the Unicode U-label form for display and MUST be Unicode Normalization Form C (NFC) as defined in [UNICODE.NFC].¶
Because JSON strings are Unicode character sequences, implementations MUST take the following precautions to avoid producing or misinterpreting uName (and any other Unicode-bearing string value) in a way that breaks common JSON consumers, in particular JavaScript, whose native strings are sequences of UTF-16 code units rather than Unicode code points:¶
- A string value MUST NOT contain an unpaired (lone) UTF-16 surrogate code point. Although [RFC8259], Section 8.2, permits such values in JSON text, they do not represent a well-formed Unicode scalar value and MAY fail to round-trip when re-encoded as UTF-8 by non-JavaScript consumers.¶
- Consumers MUST NOT use a UTF-16 code-unit count (such as JavaScript's
String.prototype.length) to validate or enforce length constraints onuName. Domain name label length restrictions are defined in terms of thename(A-label) octet count; scripts using supplementary-plane code points are represented as surrogate pairs in UTF-16, so a code-unit count over-counts the number of Unicode code points.¶ - Consumers MUST NOT rely on native string equality (e.g. JavaScript's
===) to compareuNamevalues for identity purposes, since two strings that differ only in Unicode normalisation form compare unequal even though they represent the same name;nameMUST be used instead for identity comparison.¶ - Servers MUST emit
namein lowercase. Because ACE (A-label) domain names are case-insensitive per DNS comparison rules but JSON/JavaScript string comparison is case-sensitive, clients performing equality checks onnameMUST lowercase both operands first rather than relying on native string equality.¶
11. Security Considerations
If a server accepts a uName value without strictly verifying both that it is already Unicode Normalization Form C (NFC) and that it converts, via the ToASCII procedure of Section 4.2, to the exact supplied name value, an attacker could cause a displayed uName to diverge from the name actually resolved in the DNS. Servers MUST reject any create or update request where uName is not already NFC-normalised or does not convert to the supplied name; servers MUST NOT silently normalise or correct the value on the client's behalf.¶
TODO¶
12. Acknowledgments
TODO¶
13. Change History
13.1. Version draft-ietf-rpp-json-00 to draft-ietf-rpp-json-01
- Added section "JSON Schema Composition Rules", including Section 4.10.1 and
read/createviews for Component Objects. (Issue #102)¶ - Replaced the JSON Schema definitions the generic Status Object with type-specific objects in Section 6.2.3.¶
- Added schemas and examples for the Availability Objects, service messages, and for the Discovery and Profile Data Objects. (Issues #133, #82, #92)¶
- Added IANA registration for the "application/rpp+json" media type. (Issue #84)¶
- Added Section 7. (Issue #78)¶
- Added support for Internationalized Domain Names (IDN), see Section 10. (Issue #86)¶
- Added section "Inheritance". (Issue #88)¶
- Added section describing the representation of undefined values. (Issue #97)¶
- Rewrote the partial update processing in Section 5.2.2, added replacement of a whole array, and added flow figures. (Issue #91, #77)¶
- Aligned the JSContact constraints with the RPP JSContact profile. (Issue #76)¶
- Made the JSON Schema definitions normative. (Issue #75)¶
- Added the Disclose Object and Process Object (Base, Create, Restore) schemas, and removed redundant Process alias and Transfer response schemas.¶
- Aligned all examples, including those in Section 7, with the updated JSON Schema definitions.¶
- Generalised the Mutability Rules to derive request and response content from operation Input and Output, and changed handling of disallowed request data elements from ignore to reject. (Issue #112 M2)¶
- Replaced the primary identifier with the Unique Identifier in Association Rules.¶
- Editorial: Removed rule numbering and replaced references to rule numbers with section references.¶
- Editorial: Updated the Abstract and Introduction to cover all defined Data Objects.¶
13.2. Version draft-wullink-rpp-json-02 to draft-ietf-rpp-json-00
- Added "Update Rules" section, describing update requests (Issue #54)¶
- Added schema and examples for Transfer approve/reject/cancel operations (Issue #28)¶
- Added Organisation and User Object JSON schemas and examples. (Issue #57)¶
- Added schema and examples for the Renew Process Object. (Issue #45)¶
- Added representation for embedding of process data in uniform interface operations (especially create). (Issue #60)¶
- Added JSContact as External Type Embedding (Issue #43).¶
13.3. Version 01 to 02
- Adjust rule 19 and all schemas to match it.¶
13.4. Version 00 to 01
- Updated all examples and schemas to be based on RPP Data Object and no longer on EPP XML schemas. (Issue #15)¶
- Updated labelled and dictionary aggregation rules (Issue #17)¶
- Added required "@type" property to all JSON Schema definitions. (Issue #20)¶
- Updated all example domain names to use the .example TLD. (Issue #26)¶
14. References
14.1. Normative References
- [I-D.ietf-jsonschema-json-schema]
- Dusseault, L. M., Wright, A., and H. H. Andrews, "JSON Schema", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-jsonschema-json-schema-04, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-jsonschema-json-schema-04>.
- [I-D.ietf-rpp-core]
- Wullink, M. and P. Kowalik, "RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-rpp-core-01, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rpp-core-01>.
- [IDN-Tables]
- Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), "Repository of IDN Practices", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/idn-tables>.
- [ISO3166-1]
- International Organization for Standardization, "Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions - Part 1: Country code", ISO 3166-1:2020, , <https://www.iso.org/standard/72482.html>.
- [ITU.E164.2005]
- International Telecommunication Union, "The international public telecommunication numbering plan", ITU-T Recommendation E.164, .
- [RFC1035]
- Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>.
- [RFC1738]
- Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, DOI 10.17487/RFC1738, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1738>.
- [RFC2119]
- Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
- [RFC3339]
- Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.
- [RFC3915]
- Hollenbeck, S., "Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", RFC 3915, DOI 10.17487/RFC3915, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3915>.
- [RFC4648]
- Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4648>.
- [RFC5730]
- Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5730>.
- [RFC5732]
- Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Host Mapping", STD 69, RFC 5732, DOI 10.17487/RFC5732, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5732>.
- [RFC5890]
- Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework", RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.
- [RFC5891]
- Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol", RFC 5891, DOI 10.17487/RFC5891, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5891>.
- [RFC6838]
- Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>.
- [RFC6902]
- Bryan, P., Ed. and M. Nottingham, Ed., "JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Patch", RFC 6902, DOI 10.17487/RFC6902, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6902>.
- [RFC8259]
- Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", STD 90, RFC 8259, DOI 10.17487/RFC8259, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8259>.
- [RFC8543]
- Zhou, L., Kong, N., Yao, J., Gould, J., and G. Zhou, "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Organization Mapping", RFC 8543, DOI 10.17487/RFC8543, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8543>.
- [RFC9553]
- Stepanek, R. and M. Loffredo, "JSContact: A JSON Representation of Contact Data", RFC 9553, DOI 10.17487/RFC9553, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9553>.
- [RFC9982]
- Stepanek, R., "JSContact Version 2.0: A JSON Representation of Contact Data", RFC 9982, DOI 10.17487/RFC9982, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9982>.
14.2. Informative References
- [I-D.ietf-rpp-data-objects]
- Kowalik, P. and M. Wullink, "RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP) Data Objects", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-rpp-data-objects-01, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rpp-data-objects-01>.
- [I-D.simmen-rpp-dns-data]
- Simmen, C. and P. Kowalik, "DNS data representation for use in RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-simmen-rpp-dns-data-01, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-simmen-rpp-dns-data-01>.
- [RFC3596]
- Thomson, S., Huitema, C., Ksinant, V., and M. Souissi, "DNS Extensions to Support IP Version 6", STD 88, RFC 3596, DOI 10.17487/RFC3596, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3596>.
- [RFC4034]
- Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose, "Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions", RFC 4034, DOI 10.17487/RFC4034, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4034>.
- [RFC5910]
- Gould, J. and S. Hollenbeck, "Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", RFC 5910, DOI 10.17487/RFC5910, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5910>.
- [UNICODE.NFC]
- Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Normalization Forms", , <https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/>.