INTERNET DRAFT                                    Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
                                                                Motorola
Expires February 2002                                        August 2001




                     Internet Open Trading Protocol
                         Version 2 Requirements
                  <draft-ietf-trade-iotp2-req-01.txt>


Status of this Memo

   Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent
   to the IETF TRADE working group <ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com>.

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.  Internet-Drafts are
   working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its
   areas, and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also
   distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) 2001, The Internet Society.  All Rights Reserved.



Abstract

   Verion 2 of the Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP) will extend the
   interoperable framework for Internet commerce capabilities of Version
   1 while replacing the XML messaging and digitial signature part of
   IOTP v1 with standards based mechanisms. Additional features are
   listed and divided into those the will, may, and will not be
   included.






D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 1]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


Table of Contents

      Status of this Memo........................................1
      Copyright Notice...........................................1
      Abstract...................................................1

      Table of Contents..........................................2

      1. Introduction............................................3
      2. Design Principles and Scope.............................3
      3. Requirements............................................3
      4. Security Considerations.................................4

      References.................................................6

      Authors Addresses..........................................7

      Full Copyright Statement...................................8
      File name and Expiration...................................8

































D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 2]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


1. Introduction

   Verion 2 of the Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP) will extend the
   interoperable framework for Internet commerce capabilities of Version
   1 [RFC 2801] as described in Section 3 below.  In addition, it will
   replace the ad hoc XML messaging and digitial signature [RFC 2802]
   parts of IOTP v1 with standards based mechanisms [RFC 3075].

   This draft gives requirements for IOTP Version 2 by describing design
   principles and scope and dividing features into those which will,
   may, or will not be included.



2. Design Principles and Scope

   1. The specification must describe the syntax and processing
      necessary for an extension of the interoperable framework for
      Internet commerce described in IOTP V1.0 [RFC 2801].

   2. Keep changes to IOTP V1.0 to a minimum.

   3. Maintain all existing functionality of IOTP V1.0.

   4. Test all XML DTDs and/or Schmeas and XML examples in the
      specification to insure that they are well-formed.

   5. Create usage/implementation guidance information, probably as a
      separate document.

   6. It should be designed to work well with other protocols such as
      ECML [RFC 3106].

   7. IOTP Version 2 should be developed as part of the broader Web
      design philosophy of decentralization, URIs, Web data, and
      modularity /layering / extensibility. [Berners-Lee, WebData] In
      this context, this standard should take advantage of existing
      provider (and infrastructure) primitives.



3. Requirements

   IOTP Version 2 will include the following:

   1. Be a superset of IOTP Version 1.

   2. Provide for the Dynamic Definition of Trading Sequences. I.E.,
      transactions will not be limited, as with v1, to a single payment
      and a single delivery with delivery occuring after payment.


D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 3]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


      Instead, it will be possible to propose an arbitrary sequence of
      transaction steps.

   3. Include specification of an Offer Request Block.

   4. Support Improved Problem Resolution (extend to cover presentation
      of signed receipt to customer support party, better defined
      Customer Care role, etc.)

   5. Add provisions to indicate and handle a payment protocol not
      tunneled through IOTP.

   6. Add support for server based wallets.

   The following may be include in IOTP v2:

   1. Support Repeated/ongoing payments. For example, a means to specify
      that a customer approval covers not only the instant purchase but
      also some limited number of future purchase with some total or per
      purchase spending limit.

   2. Enhanced Server to Server messages. For example, a means for a
      Delivery Handler to inform a Payment Handler that goods have
      actually shipped, which may be a pre-condition for making a charge
      against a credit card.

   3. Include the ability to add both fields and attributes to existing
      trading blocks in addition to the present ability to add entirely
      new trading blocks.

   The following are out of scope for IOTP version 2:

   1. Legal or regulatory issues surrounding the implementation of the
      protocol or information systems using it.

   2. Design of an XML Messaging Layer. Instead, whatever is or appears
      most likely to become the standard XML messaging layer will be
      used.  This includes a standard enveloping, addressing, and error
      reporting framework.

   3. Design of XML Digitial Signatures. Instead, the existing standard
      [RFC 3075] will be used.



4. Security Considerations

   As provided above, IOTP v2 will provide optional authentication via
   standards based XML Digitial Signatures [RFC 3075]; however, neither
   IOTP v1 nor v2 provide a confidentiality mechanism.  Both require the


D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 4]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


   use of secure channels such as those provided by TLS [RFC 2246] or
   IPSEC for confidentiality and depend on the security mechanisms of
   any payment system used in conjuction with them to secure payments.

















































D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 5]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


References

   [Berners-Lee] - "Axioms of Web Architecture: URIs",
   <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html>, "Web Architecture from
   50,000 feet", <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture.html>

   [RFC 2026] - "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", S.
   Bradner, October 1996.

   [RFC 2246] - "The TLS Protocol: Version 1.0", T. Dierks, C. Allen.
   January 1999.

   [RFC 2706] - "ECML v1: Field Names for E-Commerce", D. Eastlake, T.
   Goldstein, October 1999.

   [RFC 2801] - "Internet Open Trading Protocol - IOTP Version 1.0", D.
   Burdett, April 2000.

   [RFC 2802] - "Digital Signatures for the v1.0 Internet Open Trading
   Protocol (IOTP)", K. Davidson, Y. Kawatsura", April 2000.

   [RFC 3075] - "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing", D. Eastlake, J.
   Reagle, D.  Solo, March 2001.

   [RFC 3106] - "ECML v1.1: Field Names for E-Commerce", D. Eastlake, T.
   Goldstein, April 2001.

   [WebData] - "Web Architecture: Describing and Exchanging Data",
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/04/WebData>

   [XML] - "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)",
   <http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml>, T. Bray, J. Paoli, C.  M.
   Sperberg-McQueen.



















D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 6]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


Authors Addresses

      Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
      Motorola
      155 Beaver Street
      Milford, MA 01757 USA

      Phone:  +1-508-261-5434 (w)
              +1-508-634-2066 (h)
      Email:  Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com










































D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 7]


INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements               August 2001


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (c) 2001 The Internet Society, All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.



File name and Expiration

   This file is draft-ietf-trade-iotp2-req-01.txt.

   It expires February 2002.

















D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 8]