Internet Engineering Task Force                       T. Sattler, Editor
Internet-Draft
Intended status: Standard Track                                R. Carney
Expires: March 25, 2020                                        J. Kolker
                                                            GoDaddy Inc.
                                                      September 26, 2019

               Registry Maintenance Notifications for the
                 Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
                draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance-10

Abstract
   This document describes an Extensible Provision Protocol (EPP)
   mapping for domain name registry's maintenance notifications.

Status of This Memo
   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 25, 2020.

Copyright Notice
   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

Table of Contents
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Terminology and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Internationalized Domain Names  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  Maintenance Elements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.1.  EPP Query Commands  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       3.1.1.  EPP <check> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       3.1.2.  EPP <transfer> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       3.1.3.  EPP <info> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       3.1.4.  EPP <poll> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     3.2.  EPP Transform Commands  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       3.2.1.  EPP <create> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       3.2.2.  EPP <delete> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       3.2.3.  EPP <renew> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       3.2.4.  EPP <transfer> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       3.2.5.  EPP <update> Command  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   4.  Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     4.1.  Registry Maintenance EPP Mapping Schema . . . . . . . . .  12
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     5.1.  XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     5.2.  EPP Extension Registry  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   7.  Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   Appendix A.  Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     A.1.  Change from 00 to 01  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     A.2.  Change from 01 to 02  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     A.3.  Change from 02 to 03  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     A.4.  Change from 03 to 04  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     A.5.  Change from 04 to 05  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     A.6.  Change from 05 to 06  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.7.  Change from 06 to 07  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.8.  Change from 07 to EPPMAINT 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.9.  Change from EPPMAINT 00 to EPPMAINT 01  . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.10. Change from EPPMAINT 01 to EPPMAINT 02  . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.11. Change from EPPMAINT 02 to EPPMAINT 03  . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.12. Change from EPPMAINT 03 to EPPMAINT 04  . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.13. Change from EPPMAINT 04 to EPPMAINT 05  . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.14. Change from EPPMAINT 05 to EPPMAINT 06  . . . . . . . . .  20
     A.15. Change from EPPMAINT 06 to EPPMAINT 07  . . . . . . . . .  21
     A.16. Change from EPPMAINT 07 to EPPMAINT 08  . . . . . . . . .  21
     A.17. Change from EPPMAINT 08 to EPPMAINT 09  . . . . . . . . .  21
     A.18. Change from EPPMAINT 09 to EPPMAINT 10  . . . . . . . . .  21
   Appendix B.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

1.  Introduction

   Domain name registries usually conduct maintenances and inform domain
   name registrars in different ways. Given the expansion of the DNS
   namespace, it is now desirable to provide a method for EPP servers to
   notify EPP clients as well as a method for EPP clients to query EPP
   servers for upcoming maintenances.

   This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the
   Extensible Provision Protocol [RFC5730]. This mapping provides a
   mechanism by which EPP servers may notify and EPP clients to query
   for upcoming maintenances.

1.1.  Terminology and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] when
   specified in their uppercase forms.

   XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications
   moreover, examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in
   the character case presented to develop a conforming implementation.

   In examples, "C:" represents lines sent by a protocol client and
   "S:" represents lines returned by a protocol server. Indentation and
   white space in examples are provided only to illustrate element
   relationships and are not a REQUIRED feature of this protocol.

2.  Object Attributes

2.1.  Internationalized Domain Names

   Names of affected hosts MUST be provided in Punycode according to
   [RFC5891].

2.2.  Dates and Times

   All dates and times attribute values MUST be expressed in Universal
   Coordinated Time (UTC) using the Gregorian calendar. The extended
   date-time form using upper case "T" and "Z" characters defined in ISO
   8601 [RFC3339] MUST be used to represent date-time values.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

2.3.  Maintenance Elements

   The <maint:maint> element describes a single registry maintenance
   event during a specific period. This element will be used at EPP
   <poll> messages and to extend the EPP <info> command.

   For creating a new maintenance the attribute <maint:status> MUST be
   'active', the attribute <maint:crDate> MUST be set and the attribute
   <maint:upDate> SHALL NOT be present.

   For updating a maintenance the attribute <maint:status> MUST be
   'active', the attributes <maint:crDate> and <maint:upDate> MUST be
   set.

   For deleting a maintenance the attribute <maint:status> MUST be
   'inactive', and the attributes <maint:crDate> and <maint:upDate> MUST
   be set.

   <maint:id>
     MUST be present and a UUID according [RFC4122] and SHALL NOT be
     changed if maintenance got updated or deleted. A human-readable
     description of the maintenance is identified via an OPTIONAL
     "msg" attribute.

   <maint:systems>
     MUST be present and contains one or more <maint:system> elements.
     The server SHOULD NOT list systems which are not affected by the
     maintenance.

     <maint:system>
       MUST be present at least once and is an element of <maint:name>,
       <maint:host> and <maint:impact>.

       <maint:name>
         MUST be present and indicates the name of the affected system,
         such as 'EPP', 'WHOIS', 'DNS', 'Portal', etc.

       <maint:host>
         MUST be present and indicates the affected maintained system
         (host or IP address).
         Hostname SHALL be Punycode according [RFC5891].
         IPv4 addresses SHALL be dotted-decimal notation.
           An example of this textual representation is "192.0.2.0".
         IPv6 addresses SHALL be according [RFC5952].
           An example of this textual representation is
           "2001:db8::1:0:0:1".

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

       <maint:impact>
         MUST be present and contains the impact level; values SHOULD
         either be 'blackout' or 'partial'.

     <maint:environment>
       MUST be present and indicates the type of the affected system;
       values SHOULD either be 'production', 'ote', 'staging' or 'dev'.

     <maint:start>
       MUST be present and indicates the start of the maintenance
       according ISO 8601 [RFC3339].
       Format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssTZ

     <maint:end>
       MUST be present and indicates the end of the maintenance
       according to ISO 8601 [RFC3339], and MUST be equal to or greater
       than <maint:start>.
       Format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssTZ

     <maint:reason>
       MUST be present and contains the reason behind the maintenance;
       values SHOULD either be 'planned' or 'emergency'.

     <maint:detail>
       MAY be present and contains URI to detailed maintenance
       description.

     <maint:description>
       MAY be present and provides a freeform description of the
       maintenance without having to create and traverse an external
       resource. The maximum length MUST NOT exceed 1024 bit.

     <maint:tlds>
       MUST be present and contains <maint:tld> elements.

       <maint:tld>
         MUST be present and contains the affected top-level domain.
         Punycode encoded according to [RFC5891].

     <maint:intervention>
       MUST be present and contains <maint:connection> and
       <maint:implementation>.

       <maint:connection>
         MUST be present and indicates if a client needs to do something
         that is connection-related, such as a reconnect. The value
         SHALL be boolean.

       <maint:implementation>
         MUST be present and indicates if a client needs to do something
         that is implementation-related, such as a code change. The
         value SHALL be boolean.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

     <maint:status>
       MUST be present and indicates the status of the maintenance.
       The value SHALL be either 'active' or 'inactive'.

     <maint:crDate>
       MUST be present and contains the creation date of the maintenance
       according ISO 8601 [RFC3339].
       Format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssTZ

     <maint:upDate>
       MAY be present and contains the updated date of the maintenance
       according to ISO 8601 [RFC3339], and if set MUST be equal to or
       greater than <main:crDate>.
       Format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssTZ

3.  EPP Command Mapping

   A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found
   in the EPP core protocol specification [RFC5730]. The command
   mappings described here are specifically for the use to notify of
   Registry Maintenances and Registry Maintenance object mapping.

3.1.  EPP Query Commands

   EPP [RFC5730] provides three commands to retrieve object information:
   <check> to determine if an object is known to the server, <info> to
   retrieve detailed information associated with an object, and
   <transfer> to retrieve object transfer status information.

3.1.1.  EPP <check> Command

   Available check semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so
   there is no mapping defined for the EPP <check> command.

3.1.2.  EPP <transfer> Command

   Transfer semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so there is
   no mapping defined for the EPP <transfer> command.

3.1.3.  EPP <info> Command

   EPP provides the <info> command that is used to retrieve registry
   maintenance information. In addition to the standard EPP command
   elements, the <info> command MUST contain a <maint:info>
   element that identifies the maintenance namespace. The <maint:info>
   element MUST contain a child element. It is either <maint:id> to
   retrieve a specific maintenance notification or <maint:list> to
   query all maintenance notifications.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

   Example <info> command with <maint:id> to get one specific
   maintenance:

   C:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   C:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   C:  <command>
   C:    <info>
   C:      <maint:info
   C:        xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2">
   C:        <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6</maint:id>
   C:      </maint:info>
   C:    </info>
   C:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   C:  </command>
   C:</epp>

   Example <info> response for one specific maintenance notification:

   S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   S:   <response>
   S:      <result code="1000">
   S:         <msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
   S:      </result>
   S:      <resData>
   S:        <maint:infData
   S:          xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2">
   S:          <maint:maint>
   S:            <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6
   S:            </maint:id>
   S:            <maint:systems>
   S:              <maint:system>
   S:                <maint:name>EPP</maint:name>
   S:                <maint:host>epp.registry.example</maint:host>
   S:                <maint:impact>blackout</maint:impact>
   S:              </maint:system>
   S:            </maint:systems>
   S:            <maint:environment type="production"/>
   S:            <maint:start>2017-09-30T06:00:00Z</maint:start>
   S:            <maint:end>2017-09-30T14:25:57Z</maint:end>
   S:            <maint:reason>planned</maint:reason>
   S:            <maint:detail>
   S:              https://www.registry.example/notice?123
   S:            </maint:detail>

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

   S:            <maint:description>free text</maint:description>
   S:            <maint:tlds>
   S:              <maint:tld>example</maint:tld>
   S:              <maint:tld>test</maint:tld>
   S:            </maint:tlds>
   S:            <maint:intervention>
   S:              <maint:connection>false</maint:connection>
   S:              <maint:implementation>false</maint:implementation>
   S:            </maint:intervention>
   S:            <maint:status>active</maint:status>
   S:            <maint:crDate>2017-03-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:          </maint:maint>
   S:        </maint:infData>
   S:      </resData>
   S:      <trID>
   S:         <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   S:         <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
   S:      </trID>
   S:   </response>
   S:</epp>

   Example <info> command with <maint:list> to query all maintenances:

   C:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   C:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   C:  <command>
   C:    <info>
   C:      <maint:info
   C:        xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2">
   C:        <maint:list/>
   C:      </maint:info>
   C:    </info>
   C:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   C:  </command>
   C:</epp>

   Example <info> response querying all maintenances:

   S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   S:   <response>
   S:      <result code="1000">
   S:         <msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
   S:      </result>
   S:      <resData>
   S:        <maint:infData
   S:          xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2">

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

   S:          <maint:list>
   S:            <maint:maint>
   S:              <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6
   S:              </maint:id>
   S:              <maint:start>2017-04-30T06:00:00Z</maint:start>
   S:              <maint:end>2017-04-30T07:00:00Z</maint:end>
   S:              <maint:crDate>2017-02-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:            </maint:maint>
   S:            <maint:maint>
   S:              <maint:id>91e9dabf-c4e9-4c19-a56c-78e3e89c2e2f
   S:              </maint:id>
   S:              <maint:start>2017-06-15T04:30:00Z</maint:start>
   S:              <maint:end>2017-06-15T05:30:00Z</maint:end>
   S:              <maint:crDate>2017-02-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:              <maint:upDate>2017-03-08T20:11:00Z</maint:upDate>
   S:            </maint:maint>
   S:          </maint:list>
   S:        </maint:infData>
   S:      </resData>
   S:      <trID>
   S:         <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   S:         <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
   S:      </trID>
   S:   </response>
   S:</epp>

3.1.4.  EPP <poll> Command

   The EPP <poll> command and response is defined in Section 2.9.2.3 of
   [RFC5730]. The Registry Maintenance Notification is included in the
   EPP <poll> response of [RFC5730].

   For the Registry Maintenance Notification, there are three types of
   poll messages. The poll messages apply whenever the domain name
   registry creates, updates or deletes maintenance. In the case of
   a Registry Maintenance specific message, a <maint:infData> element
   will be included within the <resData> element of the standard <poll>
   response.

   The <maint:infData> element will include a reference to the
   Registry Maintenance namespace. EPP data contained within the
   <maint:infData> element is formatted according to the
   maintenance-poll schema.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

   Example <poll> command:

   C:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   C:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   C:  <command>
   C:  <poll op="req"/>
   C:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   C:  </command>
   C:</epp>

   Example <poll> response with the Registry Maintenance poll message:

   S:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
   S:<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
   S:  <response>
   S:    <result code="1301">
   S:      <msg>Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue</msg>
   S:    </result>
   S:  <msgQ count="1" id="12345">
   S:    <qDate>2017-02-08T22:10:00Z</qDate>
   S:    <msg>Registry Maintenance Notification</msg>
   S:  </msgQ>
   S:  <resData>
   S:    <maint:infData
   S:      xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2">
   S:      <maint:maint>
   S:        <maint:id>2e6df9b0-4092-4491-bcc8-9fb2166dcee6</maint:id>
   S:        <maint:systems>
   S:          <maint:system>
   S:            <maint:name>EPP</maint:name>
   S:            <maint:host>epp.registry.example</maint:host>
   S:            <maint:impact>blackout</maint:impact>
   S:          </maint:system>
   S:        </maint:systems>
   S:        <maint:environment type="production"/>
   S:        <maint:start>2017-10-30T06:00:00Z</maint:start>
   S:        <maint:end>2017-10-30T14:25:57Z</maint:end>
   S:        <maint:reason>planned</maint:reason>
   S:        <maint:detail>
   S:          https://www.registry.example/notice?123
   S:        </maint:detail>
   S:        <maint:tlds>
   S:          <maint:tld>example</maint:tld>
   S:          <maint:tld>test</maint:tld>
   S:        </maint:tlds>
   S:        <maint:intervention>
   S:          <maint:connection>false</maint:connection>
   S:          <maint:implementation>false</maint:implementation>
   S:        </maint:intervention>

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

   S:        <maint:status>active</maint:status>
   S:        <maint:crDate>2017-02-08T22:10:00Z</maint:crDate>
   S:      </maint:maint>
   S:    </maint:infData>
   S:  </resData>
   S:  <trID>
   S:    <clTRID>ABC-12345</clTRID>
   S:    <svTRID>54321-XYZ</svTRID>
   S:  </trID>
   S:  </response>
   S:</epp>

3.2.  EPP Transform Commands

   EPP provides five commands to transform objects: <create> to create
   an instance of an object, <delete> to delete an instance of an
   object, <renew> to extend the validity period of an object,
   <transfer> to manage object sponsorship changes, and <update> to
   change information associated with an object.

3.2.1.  EPP <create> Command

   Create semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so there is no
   mapping defined for the EPP <create> command.

3.2.2.  EPP <delete> Command

   Delete semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so there is no
   mapping defined for the EPP <delete> command.

3.2.3.  EPP <renew> Command

   Renew semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so there is no
   mapping defined for the EPP <renew> command.

3.2.4.  EPP <transfer> Command

   Transfer semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so there is
   no mapping defined for the EPP <transfer> command.

3.2.5.  EPP <update> Command

   Update semantics do not apply to maintenance objects, so there is no
   mapping defined for the EPP <update> command.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

4.  Formal Syntax

   One schema is presented here that is the EPP Registry Maintenance
   schema.

   The formal syntax presented here is a complete schema representation
   of the object mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML
   instances. The BEGIN and END tags are not part of the schema; they
   are used to note the beginning and end of the schema for URI
   registration purposes.

4.1.  Registry Maintenance EPP Mapping Schema

   BEGIN
   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
     <schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2"
       xmlns:eppcom="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0"
       xmlns:epp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0"
       xmlns:maint="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.2"
       xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
       elementFormDefault="qualified">

     <!--
     Import common element types
     -->
     <import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0"/>
     <import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0"/>

     <annotation>
       <documentation>
         Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0
         Maintenance Mapping Schema.
       </documentation>
     </annotation>

     <!--
     Child elements found in EPP commands.
     -->
     <element name="info" type="maint:infoType"/>

     <!--
      Child elements of the <info> command.
     -->
     <complexType name="infoType">
       <sequence>
         <choice>
           <element name="list">
             <complexType/>

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

           </element>
           <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         </choice>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

     <!--
     Human-readable text may be expresses the maintenance
     -->
     <complexType name="idType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="normalizedString">
           <attribute name="msg" type="token"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Info Response element
     -->
     <element name="infData" type="maint:infDataType"/>

     <!--
      <info> response elements.
     -->
     <complexType name="infDataType">
       <choice>
         <element name="list" type="maint:listDataType"/>
         <element name="maint" type="maint:maintDataType"/>
       </choice>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Attributes associated with the list info response
     -->
     <complexType name="listDataType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="maint" type="maint:maintItemType"
          minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Attributes associated with the list item info response
     -->
     <complexType name="maintItemType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         <element name="start" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="end" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="crDate" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="upDate" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 13]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

     <!--
      Attributes associated with the maintenance info response
     -->
     <complexType name="maintDataType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         <element name="systems" type="maint:systemsType"/>
         <element name="environment" type="maint:envType"/>
         <element name="start" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="end" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="reason" type="maint:reasonEnum"/>
         <element name="detail" type="token" minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="description" type="maint:descriptionType"
          minOccurs="0"/>
         <element name="tlds" type="maint:tldsType"/>
         <element name="intervention" type="maint:interventionType"/>
         <element name="status" type="maint:statusEnum"/>
         <element name="crDate" type="dateTime"/>
         <element name="upDate" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      systems element
     -->
     <complexType name="systemsType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="system" type="maint:systemType"
          maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Enumerated list of impacts
     -->
     <simpleType name="impactEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="partial"/>
         <enumeration value="blackout"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>

     <!--
      description element
     -->
     <complexType name="descriptionType">
       <restriction base="string">
         <maxLength value="1024"/>
       </restriction>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      system element
     -->

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 14]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

     <complexType name="systemType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="name" type="token"/>
         <element name="host" type="token"/>
         <element name="impact" type="maint:impactEnum"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Enumerated list of environments
     -->
     <simpleType name="envEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="production"/>
         <enumeration value="ote"/>
         <enumeration value="staging"/>
         <enumeration value="dev"/>
         <enumeration value="custom"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>

     <!--
      environment element
     -->
     <complexType name="envType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="token">
           <attribute name="type" type="maint:envEnum" use="required"/>
           <attribute name="name" type="token" use="optional"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Enumerated list of reasons
     -->
     <simpleType name="reasonEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="planned"/>
         <enumeration value="emergency"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>

     <!--
      tlds element
     -->
     <complexType name="tldsType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="tld" type="eppcom:labelType"
          maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 15]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

     <!--
      intervention element
     -->
     <complexType name="interventionType">
       <sequence>
         <element name="connection" type="boolean"/>
         <element name="implementation" type="boolean"/>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>

     <!--
      Enumerated list of statuses
     -->
     <simpleType name="statusEnum">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="active"/>
         <enumeration value="deleted"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>

     <!--
      End of schema.
     -->
     </schema>
    END

5.  IANA Considerations

5.1.  XML Namespace

   This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas
   conforming to a registry mechanism defined in [RFC3688].

   Registration request for the maintenance namespace:

      URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-1.0

      Registrant Contact: IESG

      XML: None.  Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.

   Registration request for the maintenance schema:

      URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:maintenance-1.0

      Registrant Contact: IESG

      XML: See the "Formal Syntax" section of this document.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 16]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

5.2.  EPP Extension Registry

   The following registration of the EPP Extension Registry, described
   in [RFC7451], is requested:

   Name of Extension: "Registry Maintenance Notifications for the
   Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)"

   Document status: Standards Track

   Reference: (insert the reference to RFC version of this document)

   Registrant Name and Email Address: IESG, <iesg@ietf.org>

   TLDs: Any

   IPR Disclosure: None

   Status: Active

   Notes: None

6.  Security Considerations

   The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any
   security services beyond those specified by EPP [RFC5730] and
   protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described in
   these other specifications apply to this specification as well.

7.  Implementation Status

   Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to
   [RFC7942] before publication.

   This section records the status of known implementations of the
   protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
   Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942].
   The description of implementations in this section is intended to
   assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
   RFCs.  Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
   here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.  Furthermore, no effort
   has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
   supplied by IETF contributors.  This is not intended as, and must not
   be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
   features.  Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
   exist.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 17]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

   According to [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and working groups
   to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
   running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
   and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature. It
   is up to the individual working groups to use this information as
   they see fit".

   Add implementation details once available.

8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC5730]  Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)",
              STD 69, RFC 5730, August 2009,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5730>.

8.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3339]  Klyne, G., Ed. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the
              Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, July 2002,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.

   [RFC5891]  Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names in
              Applications (IDNA): Protocol", RFC 5891, August 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5891>.

   [RFC4122]  Leach, P., Mealling, M. and Salz, R., "A Universally
              Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace", RFC 4122, July
              2015,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4122>.

   [RFC5952]  Kawamura, S. and Kawashima, M., "A Recommendation for IPv6
              Address Text Representation", RFC 5952, August 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5952>.

   [RFC7451]  Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible
              Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451,
              February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7451>.

   [RFC7942]  Sheffer, Y. and Farrel, A., "Improving Awareness of
              Running Code: The Implementation Status Section", RFC
              7942, July 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 18]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

Appendix A.  Change History

A.1.  Change from 00 to 01

   Removed JSON Schema. Clarified unique id with UUID. Added Common Data
   Structures for a better explanation. Fixed EPP poll response example.
   Added und fixed References.

A.2.  Change from 01 to 02

   Clarified host field. Added TLDs to Common Data Structure. Added
   Internationalization Considerations. Changed authors address and
   contact details.

A.3.  Change from 02 to 03

   Added date-time Values to Internationalization Considerations. Sorted
   Terminology and Definitions alphabetically. Changed start and end
   date-time. Changed Reference URI to HTTPS.

A.4.  Change from 03 to 04

   Added Acknowledgements. Clarified UUID field to be not changed at all
   Clarified environment field with production, ote, staging and dev.
   Clarified connection and implementation fields. Fixed writing of
   systems field. Removed author's private address. Moved this draft
   from Experimental to Standard Track.

A.5.  Change from 04 to 05

   Changed title of this draft to be more specific. Added changelog.
   Split References into Normative and Informative References. Clarified
   Common Data Types. Rephrased Abstract and Introduction. Added
   Implementation Status Section.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 19]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

A.6.  Change from 05 to 06

   Added IANA Considerations. Changed URIs from HTTP to HTTPS. Added
   new main Section 4. EPP Command Mapping. Added new JSON field
   'purpose' for announce, change or cancel of a maintenance
   notification.

A.7.  Change from 06 to 07

   Fixed typo in Section 3.4. and added missing comma in the example of
   Section 4.1. Added the field specification to help facilitate the
   adoption of this document. Changed possible purposes to create,
   update and delete to be closer to the EPP syntax. Cleaned
   whitespaces. Updated Acknowledgements.

A.8.  Change from 07 to EPPMAINT 00

    Removed JSON payload in <poll> message and switched to specific
    EPP <poll> message. Extended EPP <info> command to provide details
    on specific maintenance or list all maintenances.

A.9. Change from EPPMAINT 00 to EPPMAINT 01

   Fixed typos and added missing changelog text for EPPMAINT 00.
   Added BEGIN and END flag to the XML schema. Removed Character
   Encoding Section. Fixed indentation in Section 2.3.

A.10. Change from EPPMAINT 01 to EPPMAINT 02

   Changed the element <maint:remark> to <maint:detail>. Fixed
   indentation in Section 4.1. Cleaned up whitespaces.

A.11. Change from EPPMAINT 02 to EPPMAINT 03

   Changed reference from RFC3492 to RFC5891. Fixed minor typos.
   Added <maint:description> for a freeform maintenance description
   with a maximum length of 1024. Added optional "msg" attribute to
   <maint:id> and <maint:maint>.

A.12. Change from EPPMAINT 03 to EPPMAINT 04

   Fixed minor typos and added one acknowledgment.

A.13. Change from EPPMAINT 04 to EPPMAINT 05

   Added missing whitespace. Fixed dates in examples. Added
   clarification that <maint:end> must be equal to or greater than
   <maint:start>, same applies for <maint:upDate> and <maint:crDate> if
   set.

A.14. Change from EPPMAINT 05 to EPPMAINT 06

   Added Roger Carney and Jody Kolker as Co-Authors to this draft.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 20]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

A.15. Change from EPPMAINT 06 to EPPMAINT 07

   Changed Acknowledgements.

A.16. Change from EPPMAINT 07 to EPPMAINT 08

   Added IANA consideration section 5.1. and 5.2. Added editor flag
   to author. Changed abstract and introduction. Minor formatting
   changes.

A.17. Change from EPPMAINT 08 to EPPMAINT 09

   Editorial changes.

A.18. Change from EPPMAINT 09 to EPPMAINT 10

   Editorial changes.

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 21]


Internet-Draft           EPP Registry Maintenance         September 2019

Appendix B.  Acknowledgements

   The authors wish to thank the following persons for their feedback
   and suggestions (sorted alphabetically by company):

   o Patrick Mevzek
   o Neal McPherson, 1&1 IONOS
   o Anthony Eden, DNSimple
   o Christopher Martens, Donuts
   o Raymond Zylstra, Neustar
   o Andreas Huber, united-domains
   o Craig Marchant, VentraIP
   o James Gould, Verisign

Authors' Addresses

   Tobias Sattler

   Email: tobias.sattler@me.com
   URI:   https://tobiassattler.com

   Roger Carney
   GoDaddy Inc.
   14455 N. Hayden Rd. #219
   Scottsdale, AZ  85260
   US

   Email: rcarney@godaddy.com
   URI:   http://www.godaddy.com

   Jody Kolker
   GoDaddy Inc.
   14455 N. Hayden Rd. #219
   Scottsdale, AZ  85260
   US

   Email: jkolker@godaddy.com
   URI:   http://www.godaddy.com

Sattler, et al.           Expires March 25, 2020               [Page 22]