Internet-Draft | DetNet Applied to IETF NS | May 2022 |
Song & Wu | Expires 3 November 2022 | [Page] |
- Workgroup:
- DetNet Working Group
- Internet-Draft:
- draft-sw-detnet-network-slice-mapping-yang-00
- Published:
- Intended Status:
- Standards Track
- Expires:
YANG Data Model for DetNet Mapping with Network Slice
Abstract
This document considers the applicability of Deterministic Networking (DetNet) mapping with network slice in the context of IP/MPLS network. It identifies the mapping requirements and YANG data models being defined by the IETF to support the deployment.¶
Existing data models are identified for deterministic networking, this document outlines the applicability of DetNet for network slicing. It also identifies the features for necessity of mapping network slicing with DetNet and indicates where the DetNet YANG might be extended.¶
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 November 2022.¶
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
1. Introduction
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) is a service that can be offered by a network to DetNet flows. As defined in [RFC8655], DetNet flows provide deterministic services with guaranteed performance such as end-to-end delay and low packet loss rate for unicast or multicast data streams. DetNet assumes that the management controller can complete the path selection for the resources required by the service as to how to provide the guarantee of the underlying network resources to meet the requirement.¶
As specified in 3GPP TS 28.530, network slicing is a paradigm where logical networks/partitions are created, with appropriate isolation, resources and optimized topology to serve a purpose or service category (e.g. use case/traffic category, or for MNO internal reasons) or customers (logical system created "on demand"). [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices] provides the definition of network slice in the context of IETF network, the main characteristics, necessary components and interfaces for the general framework and realization involved of IETF Network Slice. This document provides the applicability of DetNet to Network Slice in the context of IETF.¶
2. Conventions
2.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
2.2. Terminology
Refer to [RFC8655], [RFC8938] and [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices], for the key terms used in this document.¶
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC7960].¶
2.3. Abbreviations
DetNet: Deterministic Networking¶
IETF NS: IETF Network Slice¶
MPLS: Multi-Protocol Label Switching¶
NETCONF: Network Configuration Protocol¶
NRP: Network Resource Partition¶
PREOF: Packet Replication, Elimination, and Ordering Functions¶
SDP: Service Demarcation Point¶
SLE: Service Level Expectation¶
SLO: Service Level Objective¶
SSH: transport Secure Shell¶
TLS: Transport Layer Security¶
3. Applicability of DetNet to Network Slice
3.1. Problem Statement
DetNet is a service that provides a reliable or available service to DetNet flows through dedicating network resources such as link bandwidth, buffer space to DetNet individual flow or DetNet aggregation flows. To realize this object the management and control plane of DetNet needs support DetNet flow (including App-layer, service-layer and forwarding-layer flow) instantiation, resource reservation and allocation, path computation and route steering. In data plane DetNet supports packet replication, elimination and ordering function to reduce packet loss rate and jitter performance. Refer to [RFC8655] and [RFC8938], DetNet PREOF function for service protection in order to reduce packet loss and jitter performance. Except service protection, the necessary resource reservation and allocation are feasible to eliminate packet congestion and avoiding packet loss; optimization for path computation needs be based on a set of constraints of some specific network requirements. To realize resource reservation and path computation it's recommended to use existing technologies, such as RSVP-TE, BGP, SR, etc. From the discussion on network slicing at IETF TEAS WG we know that the resource guarantee of a specific service requires the closed-loop management of resource exposure, resource reservation, resource occupation, resource optimization and other aspects, and the existing technology may not be enough to support that.¶
Refer to [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices] the network slicing technology can provide necessary network resources to meet the service requirements of users while realizing the SLO/SLE requirements for user services. By applying network slicing technology to DetNet, resource guarantee can be achieved for deterministic networking services. On the other hand, network slicing with ultra-high reliability or ultra-low latency guarantee requires the processing of packets with the help of DetNet-specific queuing technology.¶
3.2. Use Case
Refer to [RFC8578] provides DetNet use cases which include DetNet applied to Network Slicing described in section 10:¶
With the applicability of DetNet to Network Slice, not only the network capability (such as end-to-end latency, bounded jitter and low packet loss ratio) the DetNet concerns be satisfied, but also the necessary network resource reserved and allocated the IETF Network Slice concerns to be supported. There are also limitations for DetNet applied to Network Slicing, e.g., mainly used for latency-sensitive service, only support P2P and P2MP connectivity, etc. The resolve for these limitations are out of the scope of this document. This document mainly outlines the applicability of DetNet to Network Slice for latency-sensitive service.¶
3.3. Modes of IETF Network Slice Selection
This document provides three modes of IETF Network Slice selection operations as associated with DetNet follows. Additional modes may be defined in the future.¶
- New IETF Network Slice Binding - A customer may request a DetNet service with requirements guarantee, e.g., end-to-end latency, latency variation, jitter, etc. To satisfy the customer's requirements on network resource it's recommended to bind DetNet flows with an IETF Network Slice instance. The YANG model described in Section 5 of this document provides the mapping between DetNet flows with anew IETF Network Slice.¶
- IETF Network Slice Sharing - A customer may request a DetNet service with requirement guarantee where a new IETF Network Slice do not need to be created but be shared with other multiple DetNet flows. The mapping YANG model described in Section 5 of this document provides the mapping between DetNet flows with an IETF Network Slice in use. No modification of the properties of an IETF Network Slice is allowed in this mode.¶
- IETF Network Slice Modification - This mode allows the modification of the properties of the existing IETF Network Slice (e.g., bandwidth, latency, etc.).¶
IETF Network Slice Mapping Template - A policy profile which contains network constraints and optimization criteria is used for mapping DetNet flows to one/more certain IETF Network Slice instance.¶
4. Mapping DetNet with Network Slice
4.1. Mapping Requirements
DetNet service is per flow (including app-layer, service-layer and forwarding-layer flow), performs traffic processing based on the identification for flow/flow aggregation. Differences in IETF Network Slice service are considered in terms of Network Resource Partition. [I-D.bestbar-teas-ns-packet] introduces a mechanism to associate Network Resource Partition (NRP) with Slice-Flow Aggregate. If DetNet applied to IETF Network Slice, the DetNet-flow/flow aggregation is considered as the slice-flow/flow aggregation over the underlying NRP.¶
Requirements for Network Slice mapping with deterministic networking services:¶
-
The mapping of deterministic services with underlying network slice resources is necessary. It may include:¶
- The creation request for network slice instance to be bounded with one specific deterministic flow/flow aggregation instances should be supported.¶
- The sharing of network slice instance for one or more deterministic flow/flow aggregation instances SHOULD be supported.¶
- Configurations for a new network slice instance to provide necessary underlying resource to deterministic services is necessary.¶
- Modification for an existing network slice instance applied to one or more DetNet flow SHOULD be supported.¶
4.2. Mapping Process
- APP-flow packets is instantiated as DetNet service awareness flow.¶
- If there is an existing IETF Network Slice instance which satisfies the network resource requirements of the DetNet customer. After check the feasibility of the IETF Network Slice instance bound to DetNet flows, request mapping DetNet-flow/flow aggregations with IETF Network Slice instance.¶
- If there is no IETF Network Slice available, a new IETF Network Slice instance creation is required.¶
- The mapping of DetNet flow with IETF Network Slice is configured and stored in management plane. The mapping policy of DetNet flow associated with underlying network resource partition (NRP) is programmed to the DetNet or IETF Network Slice Nodes (such as SDP, P nodes, etc.) through YANG data models.¶
- In data plane, the DetNet or IETF Network Slice Nodes complete the identification of deterministic service flows (such as IP 6-tuple, MPLS labels, etc.) and correspond with one specific network slice instance , realize the slice awareness of DetNet flow/flow aggregation. Through the network resource occupation of hop-by-hop nodes along the path, network resources required by the deterministic networking service flow is guaranteed.¶
5. YANG Modeling Approach
This section provides how the DetNet and IETF Network Slice Service mapping parameters are supported using augmentation of the existing DetNet service models (i.e., [I-D.ietf-detnet-yang]). It identifies the YANG data models being defined by the IETF to support this deployment architecture and specific scenarios relevant for Service Providers.¶
The below figure shows the modeling approach of the Augmented DetNet Model.¶
6. YANG Data Tree
6.1. Service Mapping Types
module: ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types +--rw ns-mapping-templates +--rw ns-mapping-template* [id] +--rw id string +--rw description? string +--rw map-type? identityref +--rw ns-slo-ref? ->/ns:slice-template/ns-slo-sle-templates/id¶
6.2. Service Models
module: ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping augment /dnet:detnet:detnet/service:sub-layer /service:sub-layer: +--rw ns-detnet-mapping +--rw ns-mapping +--rw map-type? identityref +--rw ns-id string +--rw ns-mapping-template-ref? -> /nsdmt:ns-mapping-templates/ns-mapping-template/id {template}?¶
7. YANG Data Model
7.1. Service Mapping Types
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types@2022-03-07.yang" module ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types"; prefix nsdmt; import ietf-network-slice { prefix ietf-ns; reference "I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-01: A YANG Data Model for the IETF Network Slice"; } organization "IETF DetNet Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/detnet/> WG List: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org> Editor: Xueyan Song <song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn> Editor: Haisheng Wu <wu.haisheng@zte.com.cn>"; description "This module contains a YANG module for IETF Network Slice & Detnet mapping parameters. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2022-03-27 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: YANG Data Model for DetNet Mapping with Network Slice"; } /* * Features */ feature template { description "Support Network Slice mapping templates."; } /* * Identity for map-type */ identity map-type { description "Base identity from which specific map types are derived."; } identity new { base map-type; description "The new Network Slice are binded to the service."; } identity select { base map-type; description "The Detnet service selects an existing Network Slice with no modification."; } identity modify { base map-type; description "The Detnet service selects an existing Network Slice and allows to modify the properties of the Network Slice (e.g., SLO)"; } identity none { base map-type; description "The Detnet service is not mapped to any underlying Network Slice"; } /* * Typedef */ typedef ns-mapping-template-id { type string; description "Identifier for Network Slice mapping template."; } /* * Groupings */ grouping ns-ref { description "The reference to Network Slice."; leaf ns-mapping-slice-id{ type int; description "Identifier for a Network Slice." }; leaf ns-mapping-template-ref { if-feature "template"; type leafref { path "/nsdmt:ns-mapping-templates/" + "nsdmt:ns-mapping-template/nsdmt:id"; } description "An identifier to the Network Slice Mapping Template where the Network Slice constraints and optimization criteria are specified."; } } grouping ns-mapping { description "Mapping between Services and network-slice"; container ns-mapping { description "Mapping between Services and network-slice"; leaf map-type { type identityref { base map-type; } description "Isolation Requirements"; } uses ns-ref; } } //grouping container ns-mapping-templates { description "The network-slice constraints and optimization criteria"; list ns-mapping-template { key "id"; leaf id { type ns-mapping-template-id; description "Identification of the Template to be used."; } leaf description { type string; description "Description of the template."; } leaf map-type { type identityref { base map-type; } must "0 = derived-from-or-self(.,'none')" { error-message "The map-type must be other than " + "none"; } description "Map type for Network Slice creation/ selection."; } leaf ns-slo-ref{ type leafref { path "/ns:ns-slo-sle-templates/ns-slo-sle-template/id"; } description "List for templates."; } } } <CODE ENDS>¶
7.2. Service Models
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping@2022-03-27.yang" module ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping"; prefix detnet-nssm; import ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types { prefix nsdmt; reference "RFC XXXX: YANG Data Model for DetNet Mapping with Network Slice"; } import ietf-detnet { prefix dnet; reference "draft-ietf-detnet-yang-16.txt: YANG Data Model for Detnet"; } organization "IETF DetNet Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/detnet/> WG List: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org> Editor: Xueyan Song <song.xueyan@zte.com.cn> Editor: Haisheng Wu <wu.haisheng@zte.com.cn>"; description "This module contains a YANG module for the mapping of DetNet to the Network Slice. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2022-03-27 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: YANG Data Model for DetNet Mapping with Network Slice"; } /* * Augmentation to Detnet */ augment "/dnet:detnet:detnet/service:sub-layer" + "/service:sub-layer" { description "Detnet augmented to include Network Slice parameters and mapping"; container ns-detnet-mapping { presence "Indicates Detnet service to Network Slice mapping"; description "Container to augment detnet to Network Slice parameters and mapping"; uses nsdmt:ns-mapping; } } //augment } <CODE ENDS>¶
8. IANA Considerations
This document requests the IANA to register the following URIs in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688].¶
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang: ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.¶
This document requests the IANA to register the following YANG modules in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC7950].¶
Name: ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang: ietf-ns-detnet-mapping-types Prefix: nsdmt Reference: [This.I-D] Name: ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang: ietf-ns-detnet-service-mapping Prefix: detnet-nssm Reference: [This.I-D]¶
9. Security Considerations
Security considerations for DetNet are covered in the DetNet Architecture [RFC8655] and DetNet Security Considerations [RFC9055]¶
The YANG data model specified in this document defines a schema for mapping of DetNet with IETF Network Slice via NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. For NETCONF to support secure transport Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242] is mandatory. For RESTCONF to support secure transport TLS [RFC8446] is mandatory.¶
10. Acknowledgement
The authors appreciate Peng Shaofu and Liu Aihua for useful discussions and motivations for this work.¶
11. References
11.1. Normative References
- [I-D.ietf-detnet-yang]
- Geng, X., Ryoo, Y., Fedyk, D., Rahman, R., and Z. Li, "Deterministic Networking (DetNet) YANG Model", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-detnet-yang-16, , <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-detnet-yang-16.txt>.
- [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices]
- Farrel, A., Drake, J., Rokui, R., Homma, S., Makhijani, K., Contreras, L. M., and J. Tantsura, "Framework for IETF Network Slices", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-10, , <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-10.txt>.
- [RFC2119]
- Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
- [RFC3688]
- Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
- [RFC6241]
- Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
- [RFC6242]
- Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
- [RFC7950]
- Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
- [RFC7960]
- Martin, F., Ed., Lear, E., Ed., Draegen, T., Ed., Zwicky, E., Ed., and K. Andersen, Ed., "Interoperability Issues between Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) and Indirect Email Flows", RFC 7960, DOI 10.17487/RFC7960, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7960>.
- [RFC8040]
- Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
- [RFC8174]
- Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
- [RFC8446]
- Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
- [RFC8655]
- Finn, N., Thubert, P., Varga, B., and J. Farkas, "Deterministic Networking Architecture", RFC 8655, DOI 10.17487/RFC8655, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8655>.
- [RFC8938]
- Varga, B., Ed., Farkas, J., Berger, L., Malis, A., and S. Bryant, "Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Data Plane Framework", RFC 8938, DOI 10.17487/RFC8938, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8938>.
- [RFC9055]
- Grossman, E., Ed., Mizrahi, T., and A. Hacker, "Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Security Considerations", RFC 9055, DOI 10.17487/RFC9055, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9055>.
- [TS_28.530]
- 3GPP, "Management and orchestration; Concepts, use cases and requirements", <https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3273>.
11.2. Informative References
- [I-D.bestbar-teas-ns-packet]
- Saad, T., Beeram, V. P., Dong, J., Wen, B., Ceccarelli, D., Halpern, J., Peng, S., Chen, R., Liu, X., Contreras, L. M., Rokui, R., and L. Jalil, "Realizing Network Slices in IP/MPLS Networks", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-10, , <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-10.txt>.
- [RFC8578]
- Grossman, E., Ed., "Deterministic Networking Use Cases", RFC 8578, DOI 10.17487/RFC8578, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8578>.