CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
charter-ietf-cose-03
Yes
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Spencer Dawkins)
- Ready for external review (00-00)
- Approve (00-02)
- Ready for external review (01-00)
- Approve (01-00)
- Ready for external review (02-00)
- Approve (02-01)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2015-05-28 for -00-02)
Unknown
Since this is the first charter I am putting through, I didn't realize I also had to add a ballot after putting this in external review. If I need to defer this to the next call, that will have to be ok... The working group is active on items anyway, so it shouldn't hold them up much.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2015-05-28 for -00-02)
Unknown
I was initially sceptical that there were enough folks interested in CBOR to justify this but was convinced that there are. That does sort-of create a precedent for us that anytime someone comes along with a way of representing data on the wire then we should be ok with a WG to define the crypto for that so long as there's enough folks interested. I'm fine with that, but that does follow from saying yes here I think so I just wanted to call that out to the IESG in case someone disagrees.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-05-28 for -00-02)
Unknown
Phill is not wrong in his comments, and I have some sympathy for the path he would rather go down. That said, there is clearly interest and need here, and the energy to do the work, and that would be so regardless of how we got here -- indeed, even if CBOR had just been an ad hoc representation format that people had started to use, that came completely from outside the IETF. I think, therefore, that this working group should go ahead... and that the sort of thing that Phill suggests should also go ahead, if there is interest and energy to start a working group on it.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown