Web-Based Push Notifications
charter-ietf-webpush-01
Yes
(Alissa Cooper)
(Jari Arkko)
(Richard Barnes)
No Objection
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2014-10-01 for -00-01)
Unknown
In the third paragraph, it seems like instead of "The work may describe a protocol", you want "The work will describe a protocol". Am I misunderstanding something? I am still concerned that not chartering this work to use an HTTP-based protocol is inviting unproductive discussions when the WG gets started. I do note that Paul Hoffman raised the identical concern in his review of the charter. This is, IMO, just inviting a standard APP rathole. That said, if you really want to leave the choice of base protocol up to a consensus discussion in the WG, I'm not going stand in the way.
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2014-10-02 for -00-01)
Unknown
Can I just say how much I love short, clear charters? Not enough to write them myself, apparently, but a lot. And this one's quite accessible. I agree with Pete's comments, including the part where if you think the working group should explicitly choose an HTTP-based solution, that's OK with me.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Block)
Yes
Yes
(2014-10-03 for -00-02)
Unknown
Thanks for putting in that security/privacy text. With that, this sounds like an excellent plan.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-02 for -00-01)
Unknown
I reserved my position on this while I watched the discussion that Stephen had about Security. I was surprised that this did not reach a conclusion that he was tolerably able to live with. That is a shame. So I support his Block.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-02 for -00-01)
Unknown
I also support Stephen's push for clearer security and privacy details.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-02 for -00-01)
Unknown
I support Pete's comment.
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Unknown