datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

Automatic Key and Adjacency Management for Routing Protocols
draft-atwood-karp-akam-rp-03

Active Internet-Draft (Individual)
Document Stream: IETF
Last updated: 2013-02-25
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: plain text, xml, pdf, html

Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup
Consensus:Unknown

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

KARP                                                           W. Atwood
Internet-Draft                                    R. Bangalore Somanatha
Intended status: Standards Track                Concordia University/CSE
Expires: August 29, 2013                               February 25, 2013

      Automatic Key and Adjacency Management for Routing Protocols
                      draft-atwood-karp-akam-rp-03

Abstract

   When tightening the security of the core routing infrastructure, two
   steps are necessary.  The first is to secure the routing protocols'
   packets on the wire.  The second is to ensure that the keying
   material for the routing protocol exchanges is distributed only to
   the appropriate routers.  This document specifies requirements on
   that distribution and proposes the use of a set of protocols to
   achieve those requirements.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of

Atwood & Bangalore Somanatha  Expires August 29, 2013           [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                KARP AKAM-RP                 February 2013

   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     1.1.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  Keying Groups (Key Scopes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.1.  Keying Groups  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.2.  Key Scopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   3.  Problem Statement  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.1.  Security Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.2.  Non-security Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   4.  High Level Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     4.1.  Global View  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     4.2.  Entities in the system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     4.3.  Protocol Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   5.  Detailed Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     5.1.  System Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
       5.1.1.  Communication among the Entities . . . . . . . . . . . 11
       5.1.2.  Inner View of a GM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
       5.1.3.  Hierarchical Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
     5.2.  Protocol Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
       5.2.1.  Step 1 - Initial Exchanges: GCKS, GM mutual
               authentication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
       5.2.2.  Step 2 - Key Management Message Exchanges between
               GCKS, GM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
       5.2.3.  Step 3 - GM-GM mutual authentication . . . . . . . . . 19
       5.2.4.  Step 4 - Key Management Message Exchanges between
               GMs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
       5.2.5.  Variations for handling other Keying Groups  . . . . . 22
   6.  Other Aspects of the Key Management Problem  . . . . . . . . . 24
     6.1.  Key Updates  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
     6.2.  Regular Key Updates  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
       6.2.1.  Same key for the entire AD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
       6.2.2.  Key per link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
       6.2.3.  Key per sending router . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
       6.2.4.  Key per sending router per interface . . . . . . . . . 27