Skip to main content

Transmission of IPv6 Packets over ITU-T G.9959 Networks
draft-ietf-6lo-lowpanz-08

Yes

(Brian Haberman)

No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Brian Haberman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -07) Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-28 for -07) Unknown
I've no objection to the publication of this document.

Please note that section 1.1 has "ABR: Authoritative 6LBR ([RFC6775])"
without defining "6LBR", but 4.4 has "authoritative border router (ABR)"
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-28 for -07) Unknown
= Section 5 =
   o  Replace "802.15.4 short address" with "<Interface><G.9959 NodeID>"

   o  Replace "802.15.4 PAN ID" with "G.9959 HomeID"

Neither of the terms "802.15.4 short address" nor "802.15.4 PAN ID" appear in RFC 6282 or draft-ietf-6lo-ghc (although "short address" is used in 6282). I think exactly what is being substituted should be made more clear.

I was looking because it didn't seem to me that the HomeID is used at all in the format described in this document (right?). So I don't really understand why it would need to be compressed if it is not included at all in the format. But then I looked in the documents about compression and could not figure out what it is supposed to correspond to since the PAN ID does not appear.

If the HomeID is used somehow, then I think the privacy considerations text (which is generally great!) need to be extended to cover that, since the claims made about uniqueness/persistence of the NodeID do not apply to HomeID+NodeID.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-30 for -07) Unknown
In Section 2.3: s/section Section 3/Section 3/
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-30) Unknown
Thanks for adding text on logging concerns related to privacy.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-29 for -07) Unknown
I cringed at just about every MUST. Brian can explain why. Whether the WG actually does anything about it is between you and your AD. :-)
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-30) Unknown
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS!