Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Equal Cost Multipath Routing and Link Aggregation in Tunnels
draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-05
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-07-13)
Unknown
There is no mention of the fact that individual nodes in a network are free to implement different algorithms without impacting the interoperability or function of the network.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-07-11)
Unknown
I agree with the DISCUSS from Pete Resnick that this seems like a Standards Track document, not a BCP.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-07-11)
Unknown
I found this document clear and hope it has the impact the group intends. I support Pete's discuss though - why did the group choose BCP as the intended status for this document?
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-07-14)
Unknown
Maybe add (e.g., by using IPsec between the two tunnel end-points) to the end of the 2nd sentence in the security considerations. Just to provide an example of how it might be done.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-07-13)
Unknown
A reference to draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label-00 would seem appropriate since they seek to achieve the same though at different layers.
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown