Methodology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic Session Setup and Registration
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-12
Yes
(Joel Jaeggli)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -11)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-29 for -11)
Unknown
= Section 4.1 =
"It is best
; off to start with the defaults (w = 0.10 and
; r >= 10)"
I thought the default was r = 100?
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-20 for -11)
Unknown
I trust the shepherding AD and his review of this document.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-28 for -11)
Unknown
Since this is a set of benchmarks for use in a lab environment, I agree with the security considerations section statement that there are no considerations when used in the way described. Thanks.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-29 for -11)
Unknown
It seems like it might be worth noting for the media-on-DUT cases that the degree of SIP performance degradation due to media might differ depending on factors like what the DUT does with the media (e.g., relaying vs. transcoding), the type of media (audio vs. video vs. data), and the codec used for the media. There may also be cases where there is no performance impact, if the DUT has dedicated media-path hardware.