Post-Delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages
draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-08
Yes
(Barry Leiba)
(Pete Resnick)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-11-12)
Unknown
While the writeup mentions: Consequently the base IMAP and POP3 documents are no longer dependent on particular downgrading choices and that two methods presented are, to a considerable extent, just examples. I believe that the two methods should be Informational, as opposed to Standards Track. However, I now see the following sentence, which was essential to me: While this document specifies a well designed mechanism, it is only an interim solution while clients are being upgraded [I-D.ietf-eai-rfc5721bis] [I-D.ietf-eai-5738bis]. So I'll clear my DISCUSS. Regards, Benoit
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-09-27 for -07)
Unknown
Consider reinforcing in the security considerations section that the actions described by this document do not include removing any signatures from the original message - discouraging a server implementation from trying to be 'helpful' by removing a signature they know will fail.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-09-25 for -07)
Unknown
- Should the security considerations here have a MUST or SHOULD statement calling for the server to strip existing Downgraded-* header fields? If not, why not? - Would it be worthwhile having a PDF version of this document that contained examples that show actual non-ASCII characters in appendix A? If so, then pointing to that in the ASCII appendix A would be a good thing too.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown