Skip to main content

BGP Wedgies
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-wedgies-03

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2005-06-20
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-06-15
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-06-15
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-06-15
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-06-14
03 David Kessens State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by David Kessens
2005-06-10
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-wedgies-03.txt
2005-06-10
03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-06-09
2005-06-09
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-06-09
03 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2005-06-09
03 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2005-06-09
03 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
Figure 2 has:
                    backup|  |primary for 192.9.200.0/25
            …
[Ballot comment]
Figure 2 has:
                    backup|  |primary for 192.9.200.0/25
                primary|  |backup  for 192.9.200.128/25

and the para underneath figure 2 also speaks about those IP
addresses. I guess the fact that I had the pen for ID-Checklist
has sort of pre-conditioned me to see such things and state that
it is not in line with RFC3330, which suggests:

  192.0.2.0/24 - This block is assigned as "TEST-NET" for use in
  documentation and example code.  ...

Can easily be fixed in AUTH48 or with RFC-Editor note.
Bert
2005-06-09
03 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-06-09
03 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2005-06-08
03 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-06-08
03 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments:
As stated in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2005-06-08
03 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2005-06-07
03 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-06-06
03 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Very interesting document.  It deserves an editorial review.  There
  are a few typos that caused me pause, and they are pretty easy …
[Ballot comment]
Very interesting document.  It deserves an editorial review.  There
  are a few typos that caused me pause, and they are pretty easy to fix.
  I think that the figures could use more of the page width to make them
  easier to read.

  I agree with David Black's GEN-ART comment.  It would be good to
  add a paragraph that talks about attackers making use of BGP Wedgies
  to cause traffic to flow in a manner of their choosing.
2005-06-06
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-06-06
03 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
(from David Black's Gen-ART review)

The Security Considerations section needs to have an additional
paragraph added on exploitation of BGP Wedgies by an …
[Ballot comment]
(from David Black's Gen-ART review)

The Security Considerations section needs to have an additional
paragraph added on exploitation of BGP Wedgies by an attacker.
A common theme running through the examples is that starting from
an intended/desired routing state, loss of a connection can flip
the collection of networks into an undesired state from which not
only will they not flop back automatically when connectivity is
restored, but from which significant administrative effort (based
on knowledge that may not be locally available) may be required to
cause a flop back into the intended/desired routing state.  If
an attacker can deliberately cause the initial loss of connectivity
thereby producing the initial flip, the network impacts of the
resulting state being undesired/unintended may be long-lived, far
outliving the temporary interruption of connectivity required to
cause them.  If those impacts (e.g., cost, bandwidth limits) are
significant, this could be an attractive attack vector, and
examples of possible impacts should be listed.
2005-06-06
03 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-06-03
03 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Kessens
2005-06-03
03 David Kessens Ballot has been issued by David Kessens
2005-06-03
03 David Kessens Created "Approve" ballot
2005-06-03
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-06-03
03 (System) Last call text was added
2005-06-03
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-06-01
03 David Kessens State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by David Kessens
2005-06-01
03 David Kessens [Note]: 'David Meyer will be the proto shepherd' added by David Kessens
2005-06-01
03 David Kessens Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-06-09 by David Kessens
2005-05-02
03 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2005-04-14
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-wedgies-02.txt
2005-03-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-wedgies-01.txt
2004-10-06
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-wedgies-00.txt