Skip to main content

Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests
draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-26

Yes

(Barry Leiba)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 24 and is now closed.

Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -24) Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-12-19 for -25) Unknown
Meral Shirazipour raised some editorial comments in the Gen-ART review. I thought that the examples comment was a valid one, for instance. But I have not seen a response. Did the authors consider the comments?

(Of course, not all comments may result in changes. For instance, the issues of splitting or merging the documents are in my opinion something that is difficult to deal with at this stage, and I understand the WG if they do not want to make changes. Assuming all relevant text is still somewhere and reachable through references, of course.)
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-12-19 for -25) Unknown
*) I'll not repeats the OWS discuss point from p1.  If it gets changed there I assume it will get changed here.  If not then this can be ignored.

0) Abstract: Maybe would add stateless in front of protocol in the description.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -25) Unknown