Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests
draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-26
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2014-05-27
|
26 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2014-05-14
|
26 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2014-04-16
|
26 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from REF |
2014-04-10
|
26 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to REF from EDIT |
2014-02-18
|
26 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2014-02-17
|
26 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
2014-02-17
|
26 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2014-02-17
|
26 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2014-02-14
|
26 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2014-02-12
|
26 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2014-02-12
|
26 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2014-02-12
|
26 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2014-02-12
|
26 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2014-02-12
|
26 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2014-02-12
|
26 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-02-12
|
26 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2014-02-12
|
26 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2014-02-06
|
26 | Julian Reschke | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed |
2014-02-06
|
26 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-26.txt |
2014-01-02
|
25 | Tero Kivinen | Closed request for Early review by SECDIR with state 'No Response' |
2013-12-19
|
25 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2013-12-19
|
25 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2013-12-19
|
25 | Sean Turner | [Ballot comment] *) I'll not repeats the OWS discuss point from p1. If it gets changed there I assume it will get changed here. If … [Ballot comment] *) I'll not repeats the OWS discuss point from p1. If it gets changed there I assume it will get changed here. If not then this can be ignored. 0) Abstract: Maybe would add stateless in front of protocol in the description. 1) s2.1: might be good to have the ABNF match the text; The last-byte-pos value gives the byte-offset of the last byte, which is OPTIONAL, in the range; that is, the byte positions specified are inclusive. 2) s5.4.1: Please add a pointer to the sec cons of this draft instead of "none". |
2013-12-19
|
25 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2013-12-19
|
25 | Amanda Baber | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Menachem Dodge. |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot comment] COMMENT 1: In Section 3.2: It would be helpful to clarify that the interpretation of the date in an If-Range header is effectively … [Ballot comment] COMMENT 1: In Section 3.2: It would be helpful to clarify that the interpretation of the date in an If-Range header is effectively the same as with If-Unmodified-Since. NEW: "When an HTTP-date value is present in an If-Range header field, the precondition verified by the server is that the representation has not changed since that date (as with the If-Unmodified-Since)." COMMENT 2: In Section 6.1: This may be outlandish, but is it possible that in some cases, requesting bytes past the end of a file might cause a buffer overflow or similar? |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] - 3.2: Is an HTTP-date value a valid value for an entity-tag? If so, I assume that an If-Range value is interpreted as … [Ballot comment] - 3.2: Is an HTTP-date value a valid value for an entity-tag? If so, I assume that an If-Range value is interpreted as a date. Do you need to say that? |
2013-12-18
|
25 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2013-12-17
|
25 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2013-12-17
|
25 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2013-12-16
|
25 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2013-12-16
|
25 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2013-12-12
|
25 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-12-12
|
25 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-12-04
|
25 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2013-11-17
|
25 | Julian Reschke | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed |
2013-11-17
|
25 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25.txt |
2013-11-15
|
24 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Menachem Dodge |
2013-11-15
|
24 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Menachem Dodge |
2013-11-11
|
24 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Not OK |
2013-11-05
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Ballot has been issued |
2013-11-05
|
24 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2013-11-05
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
2013-11-05
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-12-19 |
2013-11-05
|
24 | Barry Leiba | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2013-11-05
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2013-11-04
|
24 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call (ends 2013-11-04) |
2013-10-31
|
24 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-31
|
24 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-31
|
24 | Amanda Baber | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon … IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon as possible. IANA's reviewer has the following comments/questions: IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are three actions which IANA must complete. The designated expert for Permanent Message Header Field Names must approve the third action. First, IANA will create a new registry called the HTTP Range Unit Registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-parameters The registration rule for this name space is IETF Review as defined in RFC 5226. Each registration is made up of a name, description, and reference. There are initial registrations in this new registry as follows: +-------------+---------------------------------------+-------------+ | Range Unit | Description | Reference | | Name | | | +-------------+---------------------------------------+-------------+ | bytes | a range of octets |[ RFC-to-be ]| | none | reserved as keyword, indicating no |{ RFC-to-be ]| | | ranges are supported | | +-------------+---------------------------------------+-------------+ Second, in the HTTP Status Code Registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes/ the references for the following entries will be replaced with references to this document: +-------+-----------------------+-------------+ | Value | Description | Reference | +-------+-----------------------+-------------+ | 206 | Partial Content |[ RFC-to-be ]| | 416 | Range Not Satisfiable |[ RFC-to-be ]| +-------+-----------------------+-------------+ Third, in the Permanent Message Header Field Names registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers IANA will update these entries as follows: +-------------------+----------+----------+-------------+ | Header Field Name | Protocol | Status | Reference | +-------------------+----------+----------+-------------+ | Accept-Ranges | http | standard | Section 2.3 | | Content-Range | http | standard | Section 4.2 | | If-Range | http | standard | Section 3.2 | | Range | http | standard | Section 3.1 | +-------------------+----------+----------+-------------+ We understand that the authors do not want a "change controller" column added to the registry. IANA understands that these actions are the only ones required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. |
2013-10-24
|
24 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-10-24
|
24 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis WG (httpbis) to consider the following document: - 'Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-11-04. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document defines range requests and the rules for constructing and combining responses to those requests. Note that this document is part of a set, which should be reviewed together: * draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging * draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics * draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional * draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range * draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache * draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth * draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations * draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range/ Once IESG evaluation begins, IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Amy Vezza | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Last call was requested |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Barry Leiba | State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was changed |
2013-10-21
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was generated |
2013-10-19
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-10-19
|
24 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was generated |
2013-10-18
|
24 | Barry Leiba | State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Cindy Morgan | 1. Summary Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 Document Shepherd: Mark Nottingham Responsible Area Director: Barry Leiba Publication Type: Proposed Standard The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level … 1. Summary Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 Document Shepherd: Mark Nottingham Responsible Area Director: Barry Leiba Publication Type: Proposed Standard The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document defines range requests and the rules for constructing and combining responses to those requests. Note that this document is part of a set, which should be reviewed together: * draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging * draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics * draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional * draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range * draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache * draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth * draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations * draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations 2. Review and Consensus As chartered, this work was very constrained; the WG sought only to clarify RFC2616, making significant technical changes only where there were considerably interoperability or security issues. While the bulk of the work was done by a core team of editors, it has been reviewed by a substantial number of implementers, and design issues enjoyed input from many of them. It has been through two Working Group Last Calls, with multiple reviewers each time. We have also discussed this work with external groups (e.g., the W3C TAG). 3. Intellectual Property There are no IPR disclosures against this document. The authors have confirmed that they have no direct, personal knowledge of IPR related to this document that has not been disclosed. 4. Other Points Downward references: None. New registries created: * The HTTP Range Unit Registry policy is IETF Review. This policy was chosen because range units are frequently misunderstood and misapplied. Updated registries: None. |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Mark Nottingham | Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Mark Nottingham | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Mark Nottingham | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Mark Nottingham | IESG state set to Publication Requested |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Mark Nottingham | Changed document writeup |
2013-10-07
|
24 | Mark Nottingham | Document shepherd changed to Mark Nottingham |
2013-09-25
|
24 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24.txt |
2013-07-15
|
23 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-23.txt |
2013-06-13
|
22 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland |
2013-06-13
|
22 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland |
2013-02-23
|
22 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-22.txt |
2012-10-04
|
21 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21.txt |
2012-08-21
|
20 | Samuel Weiler | Closed request for Early review by SECDIR with state 'Withdrawn' |
2012-08-21
|
20 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly |
2012-08-21
|
20 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly |
2012-08-15
|
20 | Samuel Weiler | Assignment of request for Early review by SECDIR to Nicolas Williams was rejected |
2012-07-16
|
20 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-20.txt |
2012-07-05
|
19 | Barry Leiba | Responsible AD changed to Barry Leiba from Peter Saint-Andre |
2012-03-20
|
19 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Nicolas Williams |
2012-03-20
|
19 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Nicolas Williams |
2012-03-12
|
19 | Roy Fielding | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-19.txt |
2012-01-03
|
18 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-18.txt |
2011-11-14
|
18 | Peter Saint-Andre | Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Standard |
2011-10-31
|
17 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-17.txt |
2011-10-17
|
18 | Peter Saint-Andre | Draft added in state AD is watching |
2011-08-24
|
16 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-16.txt |
2011-07-11
|
15 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-15.txt |
2011-04-18
|
14 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-14.txt |
2011-03-14
|
13 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-13.txt |
2010-10-25
|
12 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-12.txt |
2010-08-04
|
11 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-11.txt |
2010-07-12
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-10.txt |
2010-03-08
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09.txt |
2009-10-26
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-08.txt |
2009-07-13
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-07.txt |
2009-03-09
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-06.txt |
2008-11-17
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-05.txt |
2008-08-29
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-04.txt |
2008-06-17
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-03.txt |
2008-02-25
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-02.txt |
2008-01-13
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-01.txt |
2007-12-21
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-00.txt |